Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Corebridge Financial Life Insurance Fit Review for Cigar Smokers

Corebridge Financial is a good, conditional fit for occasional cigar smokers seeking term life insurance.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Corebridge Financial is a good, conditional fit for occasional cigar smokers seeking term life insurance. Three of seven platforms named Corebridge during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 5.3 and a best rank of 4. The strongest reason to consider it: Corebridge's published underwriting guidance treats admitted cigar use of no more than one cigar per week as a possible non-factor, which can open access to non-tobacco rate classes [1]. The main limitation is that this favorable treatment is conditional — it requires a negative cotinine urinalysis, no other tobacco or nicotine use for at least five years, and full disclosure on the application. Frequent cigar users and anyone testing positive for nicotine will likely be classified as tobacco users.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (google, kimi, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank5.33
Best listed rank4 (google)
Relevant product/model/planCorebridge Select-a-Term term life insurance
Overall use-case fitStrong (3 platforms); Good (4 platforms) — 7 platforms analyzed
Research date2026-09-22

Why Corebridge Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Corebridge Financial qualify for a life insurance for cigar smokers fit review?
  • How many AI platforms named Corebridge Financial for cigar smokers, and at what rank?

Corebridge Financial qualified because three of the seven included platforms — google, kimi, and perplexity — named it during ranking discovery for Life Insurance for Cigar Smokers, meeting the study's minimum-mention threshold of two. Its listed ranks were 4 (google), 7 (kimi), and 5 (perplexity), producing an average listed rank of 5.33 and a best listed rank of 4.

Qualification was also driven by evidence depth rather than rank alone. All seven platforms evaluated Corebridge's fit for this use case, and every one of them identified Corebridge Select-a-Term as the relevant product [6]. Multiple platforms retrieved underwriting guidance that specifically addresses occasional cigar use, which is unusual for a niche this narrow [13].

Fit ratings were split but positive: four platforms rated Corebridge a "good" fit (openai, anthropic, google, perplexity) and three rated it "strong" (deepseek, grok, kimi). No platform rated it poor or unsuitable. That split is itself informative — the disagreement tracks how strictly each platform read the one-cigar-per-week threshold.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Life Insurance for Cigar Smokers

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Corebridge Financial product should a cigar smoker choose for term life insurance?
  • How many term lengths does Corebridge Select-a-Term offer, and what issue ages apply?

Corebridge Select-a-Term is the product every platform tied to this use case. It is a term life policy with an unusually granular set of duration choices: Corebridge states Select-a-Term offers 18 term periods [17], and independent product directories list those durations as 10 through 35 years with issue ages 20–80 [19]. One platform's summary lists the specific durations as 10, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, or 35 years [20].

Two underwriting paths appear in the evidence. Traditional underwriting may involve an application, health questionnaire, medical exam, laboratory testing, and verification of tobacco or drug use [21]. Corebridge also offers Agile Underwriting+, which may produce faster decisions without an exam or labs for eligible applicants on certain term and permanent products [22]. Independent reviews describe an accelerated path called SimpliNow Choice with real-time approvals via telemed or electronic interview [23], and one platform notes many Corebridge term applicants qualify for a no-exam option [25].

Publicly available product material states Select-a-Term provides level term coverage during the initial selected period and may allow continuation at a lower death benefit afterward [26]. The exact conversion options, conversion deadlines, and available permanent products are not established by the sources reviewed and should be confirmed in the state-specific policy form.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Corebridge Financial for occasional cigar smokers?
  • Is Corebridge Financial considered cigar-friendly for non-tobacco life insurance rates?

Agreement was strong on the core underwriting rule. Five platforms independently retrieved guidance stating that occasional cigar use may be treated as a non-factor when the applicant admits use, smokes no more than one cigar per week, shows no nicotine metabolites in urinalysis, and has used no other tobacco products for at least five years [28]. The same threshold appears in a third-party smoker/non-smoker guideline document [35].

Platforms also agreed that Corebridge's tobacco definition is broad. The field guide states tobacco use includes cigarettes, cigars, pipes, smokeless tobacco, chewing tobacco, snuff, nicotine patches and gum, electronic cigarettes, and vaping — with only limited cigar use potentially qualifying for non-tobacco rates [28]. One platform's retrieved guidance frames this as a general tobacco-user definition covering any tobacco form in the last 12 months, with an explicit exception for limited cigar usage [32].

A third area of agreement: Corebridge is repeatedly described as cigar-friendly relative to the market. Independent reviews call it among the most cigar-friendly carriers [37] and note it allows up to one cigar per week across Preferred Best, Preferred, Standard Plus, and Standard non-tobacco tiers [39].

Finally, platforms agreed that the favorable treatment is a guideline, not a guarantee. Final rates depend on the complete application, medical evidence, nicotine testing, health history, age, amount, state, and product availability [28].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Do AI platforms disagree about Corebridge Financial's cigar frequency threshold for non-tobacco rates?
  • Is Corebridge Financial's non-tobacco cigar guideline available for permanent life insurance or only Select-a-Term?

The sharpest disagreement concerns the frequency threshold itself. Corebridge's own field guide and several independent sources state a maximum of one cigar per week [41]. But one platform's pricing analysis describes the qualifying pattern as roughly 12 or fewer cigars per year and treats that as the operative cutoff [46]. Those two standards are not the same — 12 per year is roughly one per month, while one per week is roughly 52 per year. No supplied source resolves which threshold governs a given application, and no public information was found on how Corebridge rates applicants smoking 2–4 cigars per month (anthropic).

A second conflict is internal to Corebridge's own messaging. Corebridge Direct's public blog states that tobacco users including cigar smokers are typically considered nicotine users by most carriers, while also saying the company may be able to find non-smoker rates depending on the nature of tobacco usage [48]. That sits in tension with the underwriting guide's explicit occasional-cigar exception [41]. Platforms flagged this as an apparent conflict between consumer-facing messaging and underwriting criteria.

Third, it is unclear whether the occasional-cigar guideline applies to permanent products or only to term. One platform states Corebridge's documented non-tobacco guidelines appear focused on term insurance, with permanent policy guidelines unclear (anthropic). Another found no evidence that Corebridge offers whole life, universal life, or simplified issue policies specifically tailored to cigar smokers [50].

Fourth, platforms disagreed on pricing transparency. One platform rated pricing confidence "high" and cited specific monthly premiums [46]; two others rated confidence "low" and noted that no cigar-specific premium is publicly verifiable from official Corebridge sources [51]. The specific figures come from third-party review sites, not carrier rate sheets.

Fifth, corporate uncertainty. A March 2026 announced merger with Equitable Holdings, valued at roughly $22 billion and expected to close by year-end 2026, moved Corebridge's rating to "under review" [53]. One platform listed this as a reason a risk-averse buyer might prefer a carrier without pending M&A (anthropic). AM Best rates Corebridge A, indicating solid financial capacity to pay claims [54].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What underwriting conditions must a cigar smoker meet for Corebridge Financial non-tobacco rates?
  • Does Corebridge Financial offer no-exam underwriting for cigar smokers?

The central feature for this use case is the occasional-cigar underwriting guideline. Per the retrieved guidance, four conditions must hold: cigar use is admitted at application, use is limited to no more than one cigar per week, no nicotine metabolites (cotinine) appear in urinalysis within the prior 12 months, and no other tobacco products were used for at least five years [55]. One source adds that all case data must coincide with the admitted usage [62].

Term flexibility is the second differentiator. Select-a-Term's 18 term periods let a buyer match coverage duration to a specific financial obligation rather than choosing from a handful of standard lengths [63].

Underwriting pathways are the third. Corebridge describes traditional underwriting as potentially involving an application, health questionnaire, medical exam, laboratory testing, and verification of tobacco or drug use [66]. Agile Underwriting+ may allow faster decisions without an exam or labs for eligible applicants on certain term and permanent products [67]. Independent reviews describe SimpliNow Choice real-time approvals via telemed or electronic interview [68], and one platform notes no-exam coverage limits are lower than fully underwritten policies [70].

A practical constraint worth flagging: nicotine from cigar use is detectable in lab testing for roughly one to two weeks after use, so applicants must time their exam carefully (anthropic). Corebridge Direct's own material notes that a medical exam will detect nicotine and that honesty about cigar habits is vital to finding competitive pricing [71].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Corebridge Select-a-Term cost per month for an occasional cigar smoker?
  • Are there policy fees or cancellation terms a cigar smoker should confirm before buying Corebridge Financial?

Pricing evidence is mixed and should be treated carefully. The most specific figures come from third-party review sites, not carrier rate sheets: for a 50-year-old male occasional cigar smoker qualifying for Preferred Plus Non-Tobacco, monthly premiums for $1 million of Select-a-Term coverage were listed as $68.64 (10-year), $99.26 (15-year), $127.59 (20-year), $198.13 (25-year), and $236.94 (30-year) [72]. Those same comparisons placed Corebridge lowest or tied for lowest across the term lengths shown [72].

Two platforms rated pricing confidence low and stated that no cigar-specific premium is publicly verifiable from official Corebridge sources [74]. Corebridge's own consumer materials provide illustrative pricing tied to specified age, underwriting class, face amount, and term assumptions rather than cigar-specific pricing [74]. One platform reported Corebridge's average annual premium of $272 as 29% cheaper than an industry average of $382, while noting that figure is an average across everyone Corebridge insures, not a specific quote [77]. Another source notes Corebridge term rates starting as low as $13 per month for healthy individuals [79].

On fees and contract terms, the evidence is thin. No cigar-specific surcharge or separate fee was identified in the public materials reviewed (openai). One platform notes no separate policy fee or rider fee was verified, and rider or optional feature costs are unclear from available public material (perplexity). Another states policy fees are not specified in public sources and potential rider costs for conversion privileges are not detailed (kimi). Select-a-Term premiums are described as fixed for the selected term period (kimi), and one platform reports a low monthly modal factor of 8.45% [80]. No general free-look, surrender, or cancellation terms were confirmed from the sources reviewed (openai).

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Corebridge Financial best suited for among cigar smokers?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a good choice for a cigar smoker who wants flexible term lengths?

Corebridge is best suited to a narrow, well-defined buyer: someone who smokes no more than one cigar per week, has used no other tobacco or nicotine product for at least five years, expects a negative cotinine result, and is willing to disclose cigar use fully on the application [82]. Platforms consistently place this buyer in the "best considered for" category (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, kimi, perplexity, google).

It also suits buyers who want flexible term lengths rather than permanent coverage (openai, anthropic, google). Select-a-Term's 18 term periods are the most-cited product advantage for this use case [88].

Buyers who value an accelerated underwriting path may also benefit, since Agile Underwriting+ and SimpliNow Choice can reduce or eliminate exam and lab requirements for eligible applicants [91]. One platform adds that Corebridge has historically been strong with high-risk underwriting, including applicants with comorbid health conditions such as controlled diabetes or high blood pressure (anthropic).

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Corebridge Financial for life insurance as a cigar smoker?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a poor fit for frequent cigar smokers or vapers?

Corebridge is probably not the best fit for anyone smoking more than one cigar per week. That buyer falls outside the stated favorable guideline and may face tobacco classification and materially higher premiums [95]. One platform notes that many casual cigar smokers — for example, those enjoying 2–4 cigars monthly — will not qualify for non-tobacco rates (anthropic).

It is also a poor fit for applicants using any other nicotine or tobacco product. The field guide's tobacco definition includes vaping, nicotine patches and gum, pipes, smokeless tobacco, chewing tobacco, snuff, and electronic cigarettes, and any of these can trigger tobacco classification [95]. Platforms list vapers, nicotine replacement users, and pipe or smokeless tobacco users among those who should look elsewhere (openai, anthropic, google).

Buyers who need guaranteed non-tobacco pricing before underwriting, or who want the broadest possible carrier comparison, are also poorly served here — the favorable treatment is a guideline, not a quoted offer [95]. Applicants whose urine testing may show cotinine should not assume non-tobacco treatment (openai, anthropic). And buyers seeking permanent coverage should note that Corebridge's documented non-tobacco guidelines appear term-focused, with permanent policy guidelines unclear [103].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Corebridge Financial for a cigar smoker who smokes more than one cigar per week?
  • When should a cigar smoker choose a different carrier instead of Corebridge Financial?

Another carrier may be better in several specific situations. If the applicant smokes more than one cigar per week, platforms point to Prudential and Lincoln National as potentially more flexible for frequent cigar users (anthropic), and to John Hancock or Lincoln National as offering non-smoker tiers with more liberal limits (google). One platform names Protective Life, Symetra, and Banner Life as carriers that may still offer competitive non-tobacco rates for more frequent use [105].

If the applicant has tested positive for nicotine within the past 12 months, a carrier with a shorter lookback or more permissive recency rules may be needed (anthropic). If the applicant has used other tobacco products in the past five years, other carriers may have less restrictive requirements (anthropic). If the buyer uses smokeless or chewing tobacco, Prudential is often cited as better suited (google).

If the buyer needs permanent coverage, platforms suggest looking at carriers with broader permanent product lines, including Lincoln Financial, MassMutual, and Northwestern Mutual [105]. If the buyer cannot pass a medical exam and wants guaranteed-issue or simplified-issue coverage, other carriers may be more appropriate, though with higher rates and lower coverage limits [105].

If the buyer is highly risk-averse about corporate stability, the pending Equitable Holdings merger — announced March 2026, expected to close by year-end 2026, with the rating moved to "under review" — is a reason some platforms suggest an established carrier without pending M&A [106]. Finally, if another carrier is cheaper at the buyer's specific age and term, that matters: Symetra and Protective Life were described as within pennies of Corebridge on some term lengths [105].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a cigar smoker confirm with Corebridge Financial before signing a Select-a-Term policy?
  • How should a cigar smoker document usage on a Corebridge Financial application?

The platforms collectively produced a long verification list. The highest-value items:

  • For the applicant's state and exact product version, is one cigar per week eligible for non-tobacco or preferred non-tobacco rates (openai)?
  • Does the applicant's exact cigar frequency, cigar type, inhalation pattern, or date of last use change the classification (openai, anthropic)?
  • Will any cotinine result cause tobacco classification even when cigar use is fully disclosed (openai, anthropic)?
  • Do nicotine gum, patches, vaping, cannabis products, or secondhand exposure affect the underwriting decision (openai, perplexity)?
  • Is a paramedical exam, urine test, blood test, or APS required for the requested age, face amount, and term (openai)?
  • What rate class and premium are expected before and after underwriting (openai, perplexity)?
  • What are the exact conversion rights, deadlines, available permanent products, and conversion pricing [107]?
  • Which legal insurer will issue the policy in the buyer's state (openai)?
  • Are there policy fees, riders, premium changes, or state-specific charges not shown in the initial quote (openai, perplexity, kimi)?
  • How should cigar use be documented on the application to avoid a material misrepresentation [108]?
  • Does the accelerated underwriting (SimpliNow) version offer the same pricing as the fully underwritten version for occasional cigar smokers [107]?
  • Will the pending Equitable Holdings merger affect Select-a-Term pricing, underwriting criteria, or availability [109]?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Corebridge Financial is a good, conditional fit for life insurance for cigar smokers — not an unconditional one. The consensus across seven platforms is that its published underwriting guidance is unusually favorable for admitted cigar use of no more than one cigar per week, with a negative cotinine result and no other tobacco or nicotine use for at least five years [110]. Four platforms rated the fit "good" and three rated it "strong"; none rated it poor.

The conditionality is the story. The favorable treatment is a guideline rather than a quoted offer, and final rates depend on the complete application, medical evidence, nicotine testing, health history, age, amount, state, and product availability [110]. Platforms disagreed on the operative frequency threshold — one-cigar-per-week versus roughly 12 per year — and no supplied source resolves that conflict [116]. Pricing evidence is third-party and illustrative, not carrier rate sheets [118]. And the pending Equitable Holdings merger adds corporate uncertainty [120].

For a buyer who genuinely fits the narrow profile, Corebridge is a strong candidate worth quoting. For anyone smoking more frequently, using other nicotine products, or needing permanent coverage, the evidence points to comparing other carriers before applying. The Life Insurance for Cigar Smokers consensus index shows how Corebridge compares with the other carriers that qualified in this study, and the broader life insurance directory covers adjacent high-risk categories.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a structured multi-platform research run dated 2026-09-22. Seven AI platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, perplexity) were asked which life insurance carriers are generally worth considering for a consumer who smokes cigars but does not regularly smoke cigarettes. Platforms returned ranked carrier lists and detailed fit assessments with citations. Corebridge Financial qualified for this niche review because it was named during ranking discovery by at least two platforms — in this case three of seven (google, kimi, perplexity).

All seven platforms evaluated Corebridge's fit for this use case, and all seven identified Corebridge Select-a-Term as the relevant product. Fit ratings, strengths, limitations, pricing notes, and verification questions were aggregated from the platform responses. Citations in this article map to the platform-reported sources listed below. No independent verification, personal testing, or customer-outcome data was performed.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts.

Platform mentions in the ranking stage count only platforms that named Corebridge during ranking discovery — not all platforms that evaluated fit. Agreement among AI platforms does not prove product quality, underwriting outcomes, or pricing accuracy.

Material conflicts remain unresolved: the operative cigar-frequency threshold (one per week versus roughly 12 per year), whether the occasional-cigar guideline extends to permanent products, and whether Corebridge's consumer-facing messaging aligns with its underwriting guide. No cigar-specific quote, guaranteed underwriting class, or customer outcome was verifiable. Public materials do not establish a guaranteed rate class or premium for any particular cigar-smoking pattern. Availability, underwriting rules, conversion rights, and pricing may vary by state, issuing insurer, age, amount, and product version. The pending Equitable Holdings merger introduces additional uncertainty about post-integration product availability, underwriting criteria, and pricing.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Owning a home is pricey; protecting a home with life insurance isn’t: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/insights-education/protecting-home-with-life-insurance
  • Additional AI research evidence120 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    3. AI research evidence record grok:0
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    5. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    9. AI research evidence record grok:2
    10. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    12. AI research evidence record google:1.4.4
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    14. AI research evidence record grok:0
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-7
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-8
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-17
    32. AI research evidence record grok:0
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    34. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-9
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-10
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-3
    38. AI research evidence record grok:1
    39. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    43. AI research evidence record grok:0
    44. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    45. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    46. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    47. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    50. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-9
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-17
    59. AI research evidence record grok:0
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    61. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-11
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-7
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-8
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    71. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    72. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    73. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-4
    79. AI research evidence record google:1.4.4
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-2
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-6
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-17
    85. AI research evidence record grok:0
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-7
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-8
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    97. AI research evidence record grok:0
    98. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    99. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    100. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    101. AI research evidence record google:1.4.7
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    103. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    104. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    105. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10
    107. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-11
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    112. AI research evidence record grok:0
    113. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    114. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    115. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    116. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    117. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    118. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    119. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence120 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    3. AI research evidence record grok:0
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    5. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    9. AI research evidence record grok:2
    10. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    12. AI research evidence record google:1.4.4
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    14. AI research evidence record grok:0
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-7
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-8
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-17
    32. AI research evidence record grok:0
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    34. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-9
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-10
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-3
    38. AI research evidence record grok:1
    39. AI research evidence record google:1.2.6
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    43. AI research evidence record grok:0
    44. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    45. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    46. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    47. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-1
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    50. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-9
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-17
    59. AI research evidence record grok:0
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    61. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-11
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-7
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-8
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    71. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    72. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    73. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-4
    79. AI research evidence record google:1.4.4
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-2
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-6
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-17
    85. AI research evidence record grok:0
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-7
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-8
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    97. AI research evidence record grok:0
    98. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    99. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    100. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    101. AI research evidence record google:1.4.7
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    103. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    104. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    105. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10
    107. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-11
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-13
    112. AI research evidence record grok:0
    113. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    114. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    115. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    116. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    117. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-1m-term-rates
    118. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    119. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-10

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
37
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#7

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

26 independent · 9 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

19 direct · 7 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

0168a2657249d8dff0565644182f81003fe4df99da2f3f104c367687353f141d