Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Symetra Term Life Insurance Fit Review for $2 Million or More in Coverage

Symetra is a good fit for a healthy, high-income nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $2 million or more of 20-year term coverage.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Symetra is a good fit for a healthy, high-income nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $2 million or more of 20-year term coverage. Three of seven platforms named Symetra during the ranking stage (google, grok, kimi), and all seven platforms that evaluated fit rated it good, strong, or mixed. The strongest reason to consider it is Symetra SwiftTerm's combination of a published $5 million maximum face amount, a 20-year level term, multiple underwriting paths, and a built-in conversion privilege. The main limitation is that no public source provides a binding individualized premium for this buyer, and the Waiver of Premium rider is unavailable above $2 million.

Research Snapshot

FieldValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (google, grok, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank7.0
Best listed rank5 (grok)
Relevant product/model/planSymetra SwiftTerm 20-year term life insurance
Overall use-case fitGood
Research date2026-09-20

Why Symetra Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Symetra a good choice for Term Life Insurance for $2 Million or More in Coverage?
  • Why did only three of seven AI platforms name Symetra in the ranking stage?

Symetra qualified because it met the study's minimum-mention threshold: three of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and all seven platforms that evaluated fit returned a usable assessment. The ranking-stage platforms were google (rank 7), grok (rank 5), and kimi (rank 9), producing an average listed rank of 7.0 and a best listed rank of 5. The remaining four platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, perplexity) did not name Symetra in the ranking stage but did evaluate its fit for this use case, which is why the fit evidence base is broader than the ranking base.

Symetra's qualification rests on product structure rather than brand prominence. Symetra SwiftTerm is a term life product with 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30-year level term periods, policy sizes from $100,000 to $5 million, and a term-to-permanent conversion feature [1]. That structure maps directly onto the buyer's stated criteria: a $2 million face amount, a 20-year term, and a conversion option.

The identity audit noted that official-site retrieval failed for the Symetra homepage (HTTP 403), so the matching domain was retained for downstream research but remains unverified. Company-name variants were collapsed onto one canonical brand before the minimum-mention threshold was applied. Buyers should treat the domain-level identity as platform-reported rather than independently confirmed.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Term Life Insurance for $2 Million or More in Coverage

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Symetra plan should a buyer choose for $2 million of 20-year term coverage?
  • Does Symetra SwiftTerm cover a $2 million face amount for a healthy 40-year-old nonsmoker?

The relevant product is Symetra SwiftTerm, specifically the 20-year level term design. Every platform that named a product pointed to SwiftTerm or a SwiftTerm variant: openai and anthropic cited "SwiftTerm 20-year," grok cited "SwiftTerm 20-year," kimi cited "Symetra SwiftTerm," perplexity cited "SwiftTerm 20-year term life insurance," and google cited "Symetra SwiftTerm (20-year term)." Deepseek described it as "Symetra SwiftTerm (term life insurance, including 20-year level term)."

SwiftTerm offers 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30-year terms; policy sizes from $100,000 to $5 million; rate classes; level premiums; renewal to age 95; three underwriting paths; conversion terms; and a waiver-of-premium exclusion above $2 million [2]. Symetra's term life page states coverage is available for clients 20 to 60 years old with up to $5 million in coverage [3]. A 20-year term is available with a maximum issue age of 60, so a healthy 40-year-old is within the published age range [4].

The product supports the buyer's $2 million minimum with room to spare. Symetra's current product page states policy sizes up to $5 million [5], and a 2025 repricing document describes SwiftTerm as positioned to stay in the top three for lowest premiums for limits up to $5 million [6]. Older or third-party materials have described SwiftTerm maximum amounts as $2 million or $3 million, while Symetra's current product page and a 2025 underwriting guide report up to $5 million — buyers should confirm the current limit for their state and underwriting path.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Symetra SwiftTerm for $2 million of 20-year term coverage?
  • Is Symetra SwiftTerm's $5 million maximum face amount confirmed across platforms?

Agreement was strong on product structure and coverage capacity. All seven platforms that evaluated fit described SwiftTerm as supporting at least $2 million, and most cited the $5 million maximum. Symetra's product page lists policy sizes from $100,000 to $5 million [7], and independent directories repeat the same range [9]. A 2025 repricing document describes SwiftTerm as positioned for limits up to $5 million [11].

Agreement was also strong on the 20-year term and age eligibility. SwiftTerm offers 20-year terms with a maximum issue age of 60 [12], and independent reviews place SwiftTerm availability at ages 20 to 60 [14]. A healthy 40-year-old is comfortably inside that range.

Platforms agreed that SwiftTerm includes a conversion privilege. Symetra states that conversion may be requested before the end of the 10th policy anniversary or the policy anniversary following age 70, whichever is earlier, and identifies the current conversion product as Symetra CAUL [7]. Grok and perplexity described the same conversion window [18].

Platforms agreed on the underwriting structure. Symetra describes three possible paths: instant coverage, accelerated underwriting, or full underwriting, with published typical turnaround times of approximately 18 minutes, 24 to 72 hours, or up to 30 days [7]. Independent reviews repeat the same three-path structure [22].

Platforms agreed on the Waiver of Premium limitation. Symetra states that policies with face amounts in excess of $2 million are not eligible for the Waiver of Premium rider [7]. This is a unanimous finding across every platform that addressed riders.

Platforms agreed on financial strength. Symetra reports an A (Excellent) financial-strength rating from AM Best [27], and AM Best independently reported the same rating for Symetra Life Group in 2025 [28]. A separate AM Best announcement affirmed A (Excellent) and a+ (Excellent) ratings for Symetra Life Insurance Company in May 2026 [29]. Ratings are opinions about insurer financial strength, not guarantees of claims payment.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Symetra SwiftTerm cost per month for a 40-year-old nonsmoker with $2 million of coverage?
  • Is Symetra SwiftTerm's no-exam underwriting limit $2 million, $3 million, or $5 million?

Pricing was the largest area of disagreement and uncertainty. No platform produced a verified, individualized premium for this buyer. Reported figures varied widely by source, date, sex, health class, and assumptions:

  • A 2026 independent comparison reported $90.43 monthly for a 40-year-old male seeking $2 million of 20-year SwiftTerm coverage in Super Preferred Non-Nicotine class [31].
  • A WSJ analysis cited approximately $74.69 monthly for women and $91.18 monthly for men at age 40 for preferred classes [32].
  • A 2025 market-rate comparison reported $80.64 monthly for SwiftTerm Instant Issue at $2 million/20-year at age 45, and $90.85 monthly for Symetra Term 5.0 at the same design [33].
  • Industry benchmarks for $2 million/20-year at age 40 ranged from $126 to $245 monthly for males and $99 to $178 monthly for females [34].

These figures are not reconcilable into a single expected premium. They differ by age (40 vs. 45), by product variant (Instant Issue vs. Term 5.0), by sex, and by health class. No public source reviewed provides a binding quote for this exact buyer.

The no-exam limit was also inconsistent. Most 2026 sources cite no-exam underwriting up to $3 million [35], and one source states that amounts above $3 million require full underwriting [37]. A 2023 insider document stated $2 million of coverage available without exam [38], suggesting the limit may have increased since 2023. Google's evaluation described instant issue up to $5 million for ages 20 to 50 [39], which conflicts with the $3 million figure cited elsewhere. Buyers should confirm the current no-exam threshold for their state and age.

Conversion details were uncertain. Symetra states the conversion window and identifies Symetra CAUL as the current conversion product [40], but a producer flyer notes partial conversions and underwriting conditions and is not the contract itself [42]. The exact conversion breadth and any extension period are not fully clear from public materials [43].

State availability was unresolved. Symetra states that its insurance products are not available in all U.S. states or territories [44], but does not publish the list. One platform reported that SwiftTerm is unavailable in some states including California and Florida per some reviews [47], but this was not confirmed by an official source.

Platform fit ratings diverged. Google and kimi rated Symetra "strong"; openai, anthropic, grok, and perplexity rated it "good"; deepseek rated it "mixed." Deepseek's lower rating reflected that it could not verify pricing, large-face-amount underwriting limits, or conversion details from public sources [48].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does Symetra SwiftTerm offer for a $2 million 20-year term policy?
  • Does Symetra SwiftTerm's conversion privilege last long enough for a 40-year-old buyer?

SwiftTerm's features map onto the buyer's four stated criteria — competitive pricing, comfort with large face amounts, efficient underwriting, and strong conversion options — with mixed results.

Coverage amount. SwiftTerm policy sizes are listed as $100,000 to $5 million, so the product accommodates the buyer's $2 million minimum and larger needs [51]. A 2025 underwriting guide reports up to $5 million [54].

Term length and age eligibility. SwiftTerm offers 20-year terms and lists a maximum issue age of 60 for that term [51]. A healthy 40-year-old is within the published range.

Underwriting speed. Symetra describes three paths: instant coverage, accelerated underwriting, or full underwriting, with published typical turnaround times of approximately 18 minutes, 24 to 72 hours, or up to 30 days [51]. The applicant's answers determine the path and outcome. Symetra reserves the right to require a full exam if electronic health data raises questions [58].

Rate classes. Published rate classes include Super Preferred Non-Nicotine, Preferred Non-Nicotine, Standard Non-Nicotine, Preferred Nicotine, and Standard Nicotine [51]. A healthy nonsmoker may be eligible for a favorable class, but eligibility and final price are not guaranteed.

Premium structure. Premiums are level and guaranteed not to change during the selected term. After the initial term, coverage may renew to age 95 at annually increasing premiums if the policyholder continues it [51].

Conversion. A conversion privilege is automatically included for the base SwiftTerm policy. Symetra states that conversion may be requested before the end of the 10th policy anniversary or the policy anniversary following age 70, whichever is earlier, and identifies the current conversion product as Symetra CAUL [51]. An optional Conversion Enhancement Rider is available for an additional cost and may extend conversion options [61].

Riders. Symetra lists accidental-death, children's-term, waiver-of-premium, and conversion-enhancement riders as optional for additional cost [51]. The Accidental Death Benefit rider provides up to $250,000 [63], and the Children's Term Rider provides $1,000 to $10,000 of coverage on dependent children [64]. The Waiver of Premium rider is unavailable for face amounts above $2 million and is unavailable if the Conversion Enhancement Rider is elected [51].

Accelerated death benefit. Up to 75% of the death benefit, capped at $500,000, can be accessed for terminal illness [67]. For a $2 million policy, this limits access to $500,000 rather than the full 75% amount.

Financial strength. Symetra reports an AM Best financial-strength rating of A (Excellent) [68], independently confirmed by AM Best in 2025 and again in May 2026 [69].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Symetra SwiftTerm cost per month for $2 million of 20-year coverage, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • What happens to Symetra SwiftTerm premiums after the 20-year level term ends?

No verified individualized premium exists for this buyer. Pricing confidence is low across every platform that addressed it. The figures below are indicative only and are not quotes.

SourceDesignReported premiumNotes
Independent 2026 comparison$2M / 20-year, age 40 male, Super Preferred Non-Nicotine$90.43/monthAssumptions incomplete for this buyer
WSJ analysis$2M / 20-year, age 40, preferred classes~$74.69/month women; ~$91.18/month menPreferred class, not Super Preferred
2025 market-rate comparison$2M / 20-year, age 45, SwiftTerm Instant Issue$80.64/monthAge 45, not 40
2025 market-rate comparison$2M / 20-year, age 45, Symetra Term 5.0$90.85/monthDifferent product variant
Industry benchmark$2M / 20-year, age 40$126–$245/month male; $99–$178/month femaleIndustry-wide, not Symetra-specific

Known costs include level premium payments for the selected 20-year term, potentially higher premiums for monthly, quarterly, or semiannual payment schedules than annual payment [72], and annually increasing renewal premiums after the 20-year level period [73]. Optional riders may increase premium [73]. The Conversion Enhancement Rider adds cost — one comparison showed $107.03/month versus $80.64/month at age 45 for instant issue [75].

Contract and cancellation terms: the policy may be canceled by stopping payments or otherwise following the policy terms, but exact nonforfeiture, grace-period, reinstatement, and cancellation provisions should be verified in the policy contract [73]. One platform reported a 30-day free-look period with full refund if canceled within 30 days of policy receipt [76], but this was not confirmed by an official source. Renewal after the level term is available at annually increasing premiums to age 95 unless canceled, subject to policy terms [73].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Symetra SwiftTerm best suited for among buyers seeking $2 million or more of term coverage?
  • Is Symetra SwiftTerm a good fit for a healthy 40-year-old nonsmoker who wants fast underwriting?

Symetra SwiftTerm is best suited for healthy applicants prioritizing potentially fast digital underwriting for $2 million to $5 million of coverage [77]. Applicants seeking level premiums for 20 years and a built-in conversion option are also well matched [77]. Buyers who want a carrier with an AM Best A (Excellent) financial-strength rating fit the profile [80].

Platforms identified additional fit profiles: applicants ages 20–60 wanting fast approval without extensive underwriting [82], nonsmokers in good health seeking $2–5 million coverage with accelerated underwriting [84], buyers wanting to convert to permanent policies within 10 years or before age 70 [86], and buyers working with an independent agent or BGA who can obtain carrier-specific large-face-amount underwriting and conversion guidelines [88].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Symetra SwiftTerm for $2 million or more of term coverage?
  • Is Symetra SwiftTerm a poor fit for a buyer who needs waiver-of-premium coverage above $2 million?

Symetra SwiftTerm is probably not best suited for applicants requiring the broadest conversion period or a conversion option to a specific permanent product not currently available under SwiftTerm [89]. Applicants needing waiver-of-premium coverage above $2 million are also poorly matched, because Symetra states policies with face amounts in excess of $2 million are not eligible for the Waiver of Premium rider [89].

Buyers selecting solely on price without obtaining current individualized quotes from multiple carriers should not treat Symetra as an automatic choice [89]. Applicants over age 60 fall outside SwiftTerm's limit [94]. Buyers in states where SwiftTerm is unavailable cannot purchase it [96]. Applicants with complex medical histories likely to be flagged for full underwriting anyway may find traditional underwriting carriers with faster full-underwriting paths more suitable [99]. Buyers who prioritize well-known household-name carriers or want permanent life insurance from the same carrier may prefer alternatives [100].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Symetra SwiftTerm for a buyer who needs no-exam coverage above $3 million?
  • When should a buyer choose a different carrier instead of Symetra SwiftTerm for $2 million of 20-year term coverage?

Another carrier may be better when a competing carrier provides a materially lower fully underwritten premium for the buyer's exact age, sex, state, health class, and face amount [101]. The buyer should also compare when they want a longer or broader conversion period, different permanent-policy choices, or a conversion feature that remains available later in the term [101].

Specific alternative scenarios identified by platforms:

  • No-exam coverage above $3 million. Penn Mutual and Banner Life offer no-exam term up to $10 million and $4 million respectively, with less requirement for full underwriting fallback [103].
  • Waiver-of-premium coverage above $2 million. Another carrier may be better if waiver-of-premium coverage above $2 million is important [101].
  • State availability. If SwiftTerm is unavailable in the buyer's state, alternative carriers with broad state availability should be considered [106].
  • Lowest guaranteed rates with medical exam. Protective Life Classic Choice Term at $84.06 or Principal at $84.19 (age 45) with full underwriting [108].
  • Parent brand stability. Haven Life (MassMutual backing) with competitive rates for $1M–$3M [109].
  • Flexible coverage adjustment. Ladder offers increase/decrease without a new policy [110].
  • Complex medical history. Traditional underwriting carriers such as Guardian or Lincoln National may have faster full-underwriting paths [111].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Symetra before signing a SwiftTerm contract?
  • How does the buyer verify Symetra SwiftTerm's conversion terms and state availability before purchase?

Before purchasing, a buyer should confirm the following with Symetra or an independent agent:

  1. What is the current SwiftTerm 20-year premium for this buyer's exact state, sex, nonsmoking status, health profile, face amount, and payment frequency? [112]
  2. Is the $5 million maximum available in the buyer's state and for the desired ownership structure? [112]
  3. Will the application qualify for instant, accelerated, or full underwriting, and what medical records, exam, labs, or financial documentation could be required? [112]
  4. For a $2 million policy, is the Waiver of Premium rider available, and what changes if coverage is increased above $2 million? [112]
  5. What exact permanent product is available on conversion, what underwriting is waived, and what premium basis, charges, and conversion limits apply? [112]
  6. Does conversion remain available if riders are added, removed, or if the policy is reduced or increased? [112]
  7. What are the grace-period, reinstatement, renewal, and post-term premium provisions in the actual policy contract? [112]
  8. How does the final quote compare with at least two competing carriers offering $2 million or more of 20-year coverage? [112]
  9. Are there state-specific exclusions, aviation or hazardous-avocation restrictions, or financial-underwriting limits relevant to the requested amount? [112]
  10. Which legal insurer issues the policy in the buyer's state, and what are its current insurer-specific financial-strength ratings? [121]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Symetra SwiftTerm is a good fit for a healthy, high-income nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $2 million or more of 20-year term coverage. It supports at least $2 million, offers a 20-year term, level premiums, potentially rapid digital underwriting, and a conversion privilege. The principal reasons not to rate it strong are the lack of a verifiable individualized 2026 quote, uncertainty over state-specific limits and pricing, the limited conversion window, and the waiver-of-premium exclusion above $2 million.

Platform fit ratings were split: google and kimi rated Symetra "strong," openai, anthropic, grok, and perplexity rated it "good," and deepseek rated it "mixed." The consensus is that Symetra is a legitimate candidate for a multi-carrier quote comparison, not an automatic selection on public evidence alone. Buyers should obtain competing quotes and verify the conversion and rider terms before purchase.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms (openai, anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, perplexity) that evaluated Symetra for the use case "Term Life Insurance for $2 Million or More in Coverage." The research date is 2026-09-20. Three of seven platforms named Symetra during the ranking stage (google, grok, kimi); all seven platforms evaluated fit.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-21, while deepseek reported 2026-01-15. These dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. Deepseek's response was produced without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Official-site retrieval failed for the Symetra homepage (HTTP 403), so the matching domain was retained for downstream research but remains unverified. Company-name variants were collapsed onto one canonical brand before the minimum-mention threshold was applied.

Methodology Limitations

  • No individualized quote. No public source reviewed provides a binding quote for this exact buyer. Pricing figures are indicative only.
  • Conflicting no-exam limits. Sources cite $2 million, $3 million, and $5 million no-exam thresholds. The current limit for the buyer's state and age must be confirmed.
  • Conflicting maximum face amounts. Older materials cite $2 million or $3 million; current materials cite $5 million. The current limit for the buyer's state and underwriting path must be confirmed.
  • State availability unresolved. Symetra states its products are not available in all U.S. states or territories but does not publish the list.
  • Conversion details incomplete. The exact conversion breadth, extension period, and eligible permanent products are not fully clear from public materials.
  • Platform research dates differ. Deepseek's response is dated 2026-01-15, roughly eight months before the run date.
  • No-search model claims. Deepseek's response was produced without search enabled and requires explicit verification.
  • Identity audit caveat. Official-site retrieval failed for the Symetra homepage; the matching domain remains unverified.
  • Platform agreement is not quality proof. AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality, pricing competitiveness, or claims-paying ability.
  • No personal testing. This review does not include personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification of any carrier claim.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Symetra SwiftTerm Product and Process Questions: https://www.symetra.com/customer-service/swiftterm-life-questions/
  • Customer service - Individuals and Families - Symetra: https://www.symetra.com/help-center/faq/swiftterm-life/customer-service/
  • SwiftTerm - Individuals and Families: https://www.symetra.com/swiftterm/
  • SwiftTerm Life Insurance Fact Sheet - Individuals and Families: https://www.symetra.com/swifttermapply/swiftterm-life-insurance-fact-sheet/
  • Additional AI research evidence122 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    3. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    6. AI research evidence record google:2.2.2
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    8. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    10. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    11. AI research evidence record google:2.2.2
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    13. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-3
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-7
    18. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-5
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-6
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-7
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    26. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-1
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    32. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-2025-rates
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-2
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-1
    36. AI research evidence record kimi:legalclarity-no-exam
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-9
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-3
    39. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    47. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    48. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    49. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    50. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    53. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    54. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-5
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-7
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:16-1
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-12
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-14
    65. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-1
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    75. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-2025-rates
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    78. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-1
    85. AI research evidence record kimi:legalclarity-no-exam
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-7
    87. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    91. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    92. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    93. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-2
    100. AI research evidence record kimi:termhaven-haven-2026
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    102. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-1
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-9
    105. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    108. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-2m-2026
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:termhaven-haven-2026
    110. AI research evidence record kimi:nerdwallet-ladder-2026
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-2
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    113. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    114. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    116. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-5
    117. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    118. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    119. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    121. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    122. AI research evidence record openai:c3

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence122 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    3. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    6. AI research evidence record google:2.2.2
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    8. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    9. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    10. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    11. AI research evidence record google:2.2.2
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    13. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-3
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-7
    18. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    19. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-5
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-6
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-7
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    26. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-1
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    32. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-2025-rates
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-2
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-1
    36. AI research evidence record kimi:legalclarity-no-exam
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-9
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-3
    39. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    47. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    48. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    49. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    50. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    53. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    54. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-5
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-7
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:16-1
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-12
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-14
    65. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-1
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    75. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-2025-rates
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    77. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    78. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-1
    85. AI research evidence record kimi:legalclarity-no-exam
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-7
    87. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    91. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    92. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    93. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-3
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-2
    100. AI research evidence record kimi:termhaven-haven-2026
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    102. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-1
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-9
    105. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    108. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-2m-2026
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:termhaven-haven-2026
    110. AI research evidence record kimi:nerdwallet-ladder-2026
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-2
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    113. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    114. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    116. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-5
    117. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    118. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-6
    119. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-4
    121. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    122. AI research evidence record openai:c3

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
38
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#9

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

25 independent · 12 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

19 direct · 8 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

85c43c406411aa569803bef5a9ef5c1811ffe5f3c3d18652cf847b210572694b