Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance Fit Review

Ethos is a mixed fit for Indexed Universal Life Insurance.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Ethos is a mixed fit for Indexed Universal Life Insurance. Three of seven platforms named Ethos during the ranking stage — a 43% share — and it reached the top spot on two of those lists, but one platform (DeepSeek) concluded Ethos likely does not offer IUL at all. The strongest reason to consider Ethos is access to permanent, index-linked coverage through A-rated partner carriers such as Ameritas and North American, with a digital no-exam application and a 30-day money-back guarantee. The main limitation is that Ethos is a broker, not the issuing insurer: caps, participation rates, charges, guarantees, and claims all depend on the partner carrier, and public materials do not disclose a complete policy illustration.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (anthropic, grok, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank3.67
Best listed rank1 (grok, kimi)
Relevant product/model/planEthos Indexed Universal Life Insurance policies issued by partnered carriers, including North American Company and Ameritas
Overall use-case fitMixed — usable access point, not a proven best-in-class IUL carrier
Research date2026-09-20

Why Ethos Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Ethos a good choice for Indexed Universal Life Insurance in 2026?
  • Why did only three of seven AI platforms name Ethos for Indexed Universal Life Insurance?
  • Does Ethos actually sell Indexed Universal Life Insurance, or only term life?

Ethos qualified because three of the seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and two of those placed it first. That is enough to include it, but not enough to treat it as a consensus leader.

The platform split is the defining fact. Anthropic rated Ethos a strong fit and ranked it ninth; grok and kimi both ranked it first; google rated it good; openai and perplexity rated it mixed; DeepSeek rated it weak and stated that available evidence did not confirm Ethos offers IUL at all [1]. DeepSeek's research ran without search enabled, which is a material caveat on that conclusion.

Ethos's own materials state that it offers permanent insurance including IUL, that IUL is available only through licensed agents, and that policies carry a 30-day money-back guarantee [3]. Ethos identifies IUL products issued by North American and Ameritas [5]. Independent coverage confirms the Ameritas launch and the North American Accumulation IUL expansion [6].

The disagreement is therefore about documentation depth, not about whether the product exists. Ethos publishes educational IUL content and partner announcements; it does not publish a policy-specific illustration, cap schedule, or full expense table for a named applicant [3].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Indexed Universal Life Insurance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Ethos IUL product should a buyer ask about first — the Ameritas-issued policy or the North American Accumulation IUL?
  • Who actually issues and pays claims on an Ethos Indexed Universal Life policy?
  • What coverage amount can a buyer get through Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance?

The relevant offer is Ethos Indexed Universal life insurance, distributed by Ethos and issued by partner carriers — principally Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. and North American Company for Life and Health Insurance [10].

Ethos describes itself as a platform working with carriers rather than as the balance-sheet carrier assuming policy risk [13]. Partner carriers underwrite and pay claims [14]. Ethos's securities filing describes its model as capital- and asset-light and states it does not assume balance-sheet risk for policies sold on its platform [13].

Coverage limits conflict across sources. Ethos pages and several reviews cite up to $1 million [16]. The North American partnership was announced with coverage up to $2 million [19]. Perplexity flagged this as an unresolved conflict that may depend on issuing carrier, product version, age, or underwriting class [22].

Index-option counts also conflict. An older Ethos IUL agent guide described five point-to-point index options [24], while later partner materials cite nine index options [25]. MoneyGeek describes caps of 10% to 12% with a 0% floor [26]. These figures are platform- and review-reported and should be confirmed in a current illustration.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance?
  • Is Ethos a life insurance carrier or a broker for Indexed Universal Life Insurance?

Four points drew broad agreement across the platforms that named Ethos.

First, Ethos is a distributor, not the insurer. OpenAI, anthropic, grok, perplexity, kimi, and google all describe Ethos as a platform or broker whose policies are issued by partner carriers [27].

Second, the product structure matches the use case. Ethos describes permanent coverage, flexible premiums, and cash value credited partly by index performance such as the S&P 500 or Russell, subject to caps, participation rates, and floors [33]. Cash value is not directly invested in the index and upside is limited by policy terms [33].

Third, underwriting is simplified. Multiple platforms report a no-medical-exam, digital application with instant or near-instant decisions for eligible applicants [36].

Fourth, partner carriers carry strong ratings. MoneyGeek reports each partner holds at least an A (Excellent) AM Best rating, and Ogletree reports ratings ranging from A to A+ [40]. These are review-reported ratings, not verified rating-agency records.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why do AI platforms disagree about whether Ethos offers Indexed Universal Life Insurance?
  • Is Ethos IUL coverage capped at $1 million or $2 million?
  • How transparent is Ethos about Indexed Universal Life caps, charges, and illustrations?

The sharpest disagreement is whether Ethos offers IUL at all. DeepSeek concluded it likely does not, citing Ethos's term-life focus and the absence of Ethos from an independent best-IUL list [44]. That research ran with search disabled, and the other six platforms found contrary evidence, including Ethos's own IUL pages and partner press releases [46]. Treat DeepSeek's conclusion as an outlier produced without retrieval.

Fit ratings diverged widely: anthropic "strong," google and grok "good," openai and perplexity "mixed," kimi "uncertain," DeepSeek "weak." No platform claimed Ethos is objectively the best overall IUL provider, and openai explicitly stated that no independent evidence reviewed establishes that [49].

Coverage limits remain unresolved at $1 million versus $2 million [50]. Index-option counts conflict at five versus nine [52]. Caps, participation rates, spreads, surrender charges, and cost-of-insurance schedules were not verified from primary policy documents by any platform [46].

Two further uncertainties: whether a two-year graded death benefit applies to all Ethos IUL products or only certain ones [50], and whether Ethos's claim that its illustrations are "among the most reliable in the industry" has any independent support — it comes from company material only [56].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance include at no extra cost?
  • Does Ethos IUL offer a 0% floor and multiple index options?
  • Can a buyer add riders or choose a carrier with Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance?

Ethos IUL is positioned around permanent death benefit, flexible premiums, and index-linked cash value with a 0% floor [57]. The floor limits index-account losses but does not prevent policy charges or cost-of-insurance deductions from reducing cash value [60].

Two living benefit riders are reported as included at no extra cost: a Care4Life Accelerated Death Benefit for critical, chronic, and terminal illness, and a Lifetime Income Rider [62]. Free estate planning tools — wills and living trusts — are also reported as included [64]. Ethos's own terms note the Perks rider is not available with policies issued in WA and SD, and that will-and-trust services are not available in AK and LA (official:C1).

Policy design support includes Smart Solve, an optimized case-design tool for premium and coverage targets, plus three advanced design options, with a custom client report included with all illustrations [66].

Customization is limited. Buyers cannot choose which carrier issues the policy, and rider options are narrower than at traditional insurers [68]. Ethos does not support beneficiary changes or claim filing through its website [70]. No live chat is available despite the online-first model [71].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance cost per month?
  • Are there setup, cancellation, or surrender fees with Ethos IUL?
  • What ongoing charges reduce Ethos IUL cash value over time?

No reliable policy-specific premium can be stated from public materials. OpenAI rated pricing confidence low and stated that IUL cost depends on age, health, face amount, underwriting, planned premium, death-benefit option, carrier, charges, and selected guarantees [73].

Illustrative figures reported by reviewers: average monthly costs of $328 for men and $275 for women [74]; a $500,000 policy at age 40 averaging about $54 per month for women and $72 for men [76]; and IUL rates running 14% to 15% below the national average [77]. These are comparison examples, not quotes, and the below-average claim rests on a specific age, health, and coverage profile [77].

One comparison point cuts against the pricing narrative: Protective was reported at $325 per month for men versus $328 for Ethos, with Protective running about $5 more for women [79].

Known cost components include premiums required to keep the policy adequately funded, cost-of-insurance and policy expense charges, potential surrender charges, and policy-loan interest and withdrawal effects [73]. Agent compensation embedded in policy economics was not verified in reviewed public materials [73].

Contract terms: a 30-day money-back guarantee, with cancellation afterward without extra fees per Ethos [80]. Flexible premiums do not mean unlimited discretion — insufficient funding can reduce cash value or cause lapse [81]. NAIC notes universal life requires sufficient funding to keep coverage in force and recommends reviewing guarantees, illustrations, changing values, and maximum premiums [81]. Ethos's own terms state that quotes are not final prices and that the price is not set until the contract is signed and the initial premium paid (official:C2).

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Ethos Indexed Universal Life Insurance best for?
  • Is Ethos IUL a good fit for a buyer who wants a fast, no-exam permanent policy?

Ethos IUL is best suited to consumers who value a digital application and access to partnered-carrier IUL products [82]. That includes buyers seeking simplified or instant-decision underwriting where eligible [83], and buyers willing to work through a licensed agent and independently compare the underlying carrier and policy design [85].

It also fits buyers who want permanent coverage with index-linked upside and a 0% floor, and who value included living benefit riders and estate planning tools at no extra cost [86]. Moderate coverage needs in the $1 million to $2 million range are within the reported limits [88].

Applicants are generally ages 20 to 85 per Ethos, with other sources citing 18 to 66 for IUL specifically — a conflict buyers should verify [85]. Availability is 49 states plus Washington, D.C., excluding New York [91].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Ethos for Indexed Universal Life Insurance?
  • Is Ethos IUL a poor fit for buyers who need high coverage or carrier choice?

Buyers who want one directly accountable insurance carrier with a broad, publicly comparable IUL lineup should look elsewhere [93]. So should buyers requiring fully transparent public pricing, policy-specific caps, charges, and long-term illustrations before contacting an agent [93].

New York residents cannot buy Ethos coverage [95]. Buyers needing coverage above the reported $1 million to $2 million ceiling, or higher face amounts for estate planning, are outside the product's range [97]. Applicants over 66 may be excluded from IUL, since competitors extend to ages 85 to 90 [99].

Buyers who want to select their specific carrier cannot do so — Ethos assigns based on profile [100]. Those needing extensive rider customization beyond the included living benefits will find options narrower than at traditional insurers [100]. Buyers whose primary goal is death benefit only will find term life significantly cheaper [97]. And buyers who cannot commit to consistent 20-plus-year premium funding face elevated lapse risk, since IUL charges rise over time and underfunded policies can lapse with potential tax consequences [102].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Ethos for a buyer who needs a no-lapse guarantee?
  • When should a buyer choose a direct IUL carrier instead of Ethos?
  • Is a retirement account better than Ethos IUL for a buyer who has not maxed out contributions?

Several situations point away from Ethos.

Buyers who want a single carrier with published IUL designs and guaranteed minimum caps or floors may prefer Pacific Life, Securian Financial, or Principal [104]. Buyers who need a no-lapse guarantee to age 90 or lifetime should note that Pacific Horizon IUL 2 and Pacific Trident IUL offer this, with Trident including a 0% floor on indexed accounts and a 1% guaranteed minimum fixed account [104].

Buyers who want a guaranteed minimum fixed account rate alongside indexed options may prefer United Life's LegacyAccel, which offers a 2.50% guaranteed minimum fixed account and a 100% participation S&P 500 point-to-point capped account [108]. Buyers seeking documented charge ranges may prefer North American Builder IUL or Builder Plus IUL, which publish variable loan interest rates with a 6% maximum and 3.5% minimum and guarantee a 0% floor [109]. Buyers concerned about early surrender charges should note Prudential Momentum IUL carries significant early-year surrender charges that decline to zero over time [110].

Buyers who have not maxed out 401(k) or IRA contributions may find mainstream retirement accounts offer lower costs and stronger tax advantages [111]. Buyers who want guaranteed universal life for predictable lifetime death benefit, or traditional whole life for fixed premiums and simpler mechanics, should compare those structures instead [112]. Buyers needing higher coverage or specialized estate-planning riders should consider a carrier with a broader publicly documented IUL portfolio [112].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Ethos before signing an Indexed Universal Life contract?
  • Which carrier will issue the Ethos IUL policy, and what are its ratings?
  • What guaranteed and non-guaranteed values should appear in an Ethos IUL illustration?

Before signing, confirm which legal insurance company issues the exact policy and its current A.M. Best, Moody's, and S&P ratings [113]. Confirm the exact policy form and product name — North American accumulation IUL, Ameritas protection IUL, or another contract [114].

Request guaranteed and current illustrated values at years 5, 10, 20, 30, and age 100, and confirm the guaranteed minimum interest rate, current caps, participation rates, spreads, index options, and the rules for changing them [116]. Ask for cost-of-insurance charges, premium loads, administrative fees, rider charges, surrender charges, and maximum guaranteed charges [116].

Confirm the planned premium required to keep coverage in force under guaranteed and conservative non-guaranteed assumptions, and what happens if premiums are reduced, skipped, or paid late [119]. Ask whether the policy includes a no-lapse or secondary guarantee and what premium pattern preserves it [119].

Verify how loans and withdrawals affect cash value, death benefit, lapse risk, and potential tax liability [116]. Ask about agent compensation and whether Ethos or the agent offers competing carriers for comparison [116]. Confirm state availability and any state-specific forms, riders, or limitations [121]. Request net surrender value during each of the first 15 policy years and at later durations [116]. Confirm whether a two-year graded death benefit applies to the specific policy and carrier [122].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Ethos is a mixed fit for Indexed Universal Life Insurance. Three of seven platforms named it in the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 3.67 and a best rank of 1. Fit ratings ranged from strong to weak across the seven platforms, and no platform established that Ethos offers objectively the best overall IUL value.

The case for Ethos rests on access: permanent index-linked coverage through A-rated partner carriers, a digital no-exam application, included living benefit riders, and a 30-day money-back guarantee. The case against rests on accountability and transparency: Ethos is not the insurer, buyers cannot choose the carrier, coverage is capped at a reported $1 million to $2 million, the product is unavailable in New York, and no platform verified a complete policy illustration, cap schedule, or expense table from primary documents.

Buyers who value convenience and are willing to evaluate the issuing carrier's contract on its own terms can use Ethos as an entry point. Buyers who prioritize carrier accountability, published policy design, no-lapse guarantees, or higher face amounts should compare direct carriers before deciding. The consensus index for this category is available at Indexed Universal Life Insurance.

How This Review Was Produced

This review aggregates fit-research responses from seven AI platforms — anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity — each asked which life insurance carriers they would recommend for a consumer seeking Indexed Universal Life Insurance with permanent death-benefit protection, flexible premiums, and index-linked cash-value growth. The study date is 2026-09-20.

Platform mentions count only platforms that named Ethos during ranking discovery. All seven platforms evaluated fit, but only three named Ethos in their rankings. Fit ratings, product details, pricing figures, and limitations are reproduced as platform-reported findings with their supplied citation IDs. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the underlying evidence, so company claims are not described here as independently verified.

Methodology Limitations

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-20. DeepSeek's response is dated 2026-01-15 and ran with search disabled; the other six platforms are dated 2026-09-21. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. DeepSeek's conclusion that Ethos likely does not offer IUL was produced without retrieval and conflicts with six other platforms and with Ethos's own published materials.

Material conflicts remain unresolved: coverage limits ($1 million versus $2 million), index-option counts (five versus nine), applicant age ranges (18–66 versus 20–85), and whether a two-year graded death benefit applies to all products. No platform verified caps, participation rates, spreads, surrender charges, or cost-of-insurance schedules from primary policy documents. No independent evidence reviewed establishes that Ethos is objectively the best overall IUL provider. AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • Ethos Life Instant Decision Term | Fast, No Exam Coverage: https://diversifiedins.com/ethos-life-instant-decision-term/
  • Ethos Life Insurance Review 2026 | Pros, Cons & Rates: https://ogletreefinancial.com/blog/ethos-life-insurance-company-review/
  • Best Indexed Universal Life Insurance (2026) - MoneyGeek.com: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/life/best-indexed-universal-life-insurance/
  • Best Indexed Universal Life Insurance (2026) | MoneyGeek: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/life/best/indexed-universal-life-insurance/
  • IUL Pros and Cons: Should You Buy an IUL? | MoneyGeek: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/life/iul-pros-cons/
  • 2026 Ethos Life Insurance Review: Rates, Pros & Cons: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/life/reviews/ethos/
  • Ethos Life Insurance Review 2026: Pros & Cons - NerdWallet: https://www.nerdwallet.com/insurance/life/ethos-life-insurance-review
  • Ethos Life Review: Pros and Cons As You Explore Life Insurance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmaTJvTMU0I
  • Additional AI research evidence122 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_1
    2. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-2
    8. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-2
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-10
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-4
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-2
    21. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    24. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    25. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-4
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    29. AI research evidence record grok:3
    30. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:ethos-site
    32. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-6
    35. AI research evidence record grok:0
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-4
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-5
    39. AI research evidence record google:2.2.8
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-7
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-3
    44. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_1
    45. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_2
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    48. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    53. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    54. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    55. AI research evidence record kimi:ethos-site
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-11
    57. AI research evidence record grok:0
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-4
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-6
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-2
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    65. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-11
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-19
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-24
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-21
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-21
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-26
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    75. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    76. AI research evidence record grok:1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-2
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-9
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-6
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-4
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    94. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-4
    96. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-1
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-19
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-24
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    104. AI research evidence record kimi:pacificlife-iul
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:securian-iul
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:principal-iul
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:pacificlife-trident
    108. AI research evidence record kimi:unitedlife-iul
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:northamerican-iul
    110. AI research evidence record kimi:prudential-iul
    111. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    113. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    114. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    117. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-4
    118. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    119. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    120. AI research evidence record kimi:pacificlife-iul
    121. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-4
    122. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence122 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_1
    2. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-2
    8. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-2
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-10
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-4
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-2
    21. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    24. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    25. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-4
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    29. AI research evidence record grok:3
    30. AI research evidence record perplexity:c11
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:ethos-site
    32. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-6
    35. AI research evidence record grok:0
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-4
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-5
    39. AI research evidence record google:2.2.8
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-7
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-1
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-3
    44. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_1
    45. AI research evidence record deepseek:citation_2
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    48. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    53. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    54. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    55. AI research evidence record kimi:ethos-site
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-11
    57. AI research evidence record grok:0
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-4
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-6
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-2
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    65. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-11
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-19
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-24
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-21
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-21
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-26
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    75. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    76. AI research evidence record grok:1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-2
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-9
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    80. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-6
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-4
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    94. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-4
    96. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-4
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-1
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-19
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-24
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    104. AI research evidence record kimi:pacificlife-iul
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:securian-iul
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:principal-iul
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:pacificlife-trident
    108. AI research evidence record kimi:unitedlife-iul
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:northamerican-iul
    110. AI research evidence record kimi:prudential-iul
    111. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul
    112. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    113. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    114. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    115. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-10
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    117. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-4
    118. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    119. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    120. AI research evidence record kimi:pacificlife-iul
    121. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-4
    122. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
43
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#6

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

15 independent · 25 company-owned · 3 unclear

Evidence support

36 direct · 7 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

210db3ca18f72caa714523d228052128f8c24d98ba86282b6966ac351fd24bad