Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL Indexed Universal Life Insurance Fit Review for People in Their 40s

Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL is a good — but not conclusively best — fit for a healthy nonsmoking buyer in their 40s who wants permanent indexed universal life coverage with long-term cash-value potential.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL is a good — but not conclusively best — fit for a healthy nonsmoking buyer in their 40s who wants permanent indexed universal life coverage with long-term cash-value potential. Three of the seven platforms in this study named it during the ranking stage, and six of seven returned a usable fit assessment. The strongest reason to consider it is the combination of a 0% indexed-crediting floor, multiple crediting strategies, flexible premiums, and strong reported carrier financial strength. The main limitation is that public materials do not disclose enough current policy-charge detail or buyer-specific pricing to establish that its costs and long-term value beat competing IUL designs.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank7.0
Best listed rank5 (anthropic)
Relevant product/model/planIncome Advantage IUL, underwritten by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company; also referenced as Discover IUL / Indexed Universal Life
Overall use-case fitGood, with important qualification
Research date2026-09-20

Why Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL qualify for this Indexed Universal Life Insurance for People in Their 40s study?
  • How many AI platforms named Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL during the ranking stage?

Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL qualified because it is a permanent indexed universal life policy that directly matches the study's buyer profile: a healthy nonsmoker in their 40s who wants meaningful death-benefit protection plus long-term cash-value potential. It cleared the study's minimum-mention threshold, appearing in three of seven platform responses during ranking discovery (anthropic, deepseek, kimi), a 42.9% share. Its average listed rank was 7.0, with a best rank of 5 from anthropic.

The product is an indexed universal life policy providing long-term life insurance protection and potential cash-value accumulation accessible through policy loans or withdrawals; it is not a direct investment in the index [1]. It offers a fixed account plus three indexed-crediting approaches, uses an annual point-to-point method, and applies a 0% indexed-crediting floor [1]. Mutual of Omaha reports A+ ratings from AM Best, S&P Global, and Moody's for Mutual of Omaha and United of Omaha with stable outlooks [3], and AM Best independently reported an A+ Superior Financial Strength Rating for Mutual of Omaha and its subsidiaries, including United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, effective April 2, 2026, with a stable outlook [5].

The study's broader consensus ranking is maintained in the Indexed Universal Life Insurance for People in Their 40s index.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Indexed Universal Life Insurance for People in Their 40s

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL plan is most relevant for a healthy nonsmoker in their 40s who wants permanent coverage?
  • Is Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL the same product as Discover IUL or Mutual of Omaha Indexed Universal Life?

The relevant product is Income Advantage IUL, underwritten by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, and product materials also identify it as Discover IUL / Income Advantage IUL [7]. The naming is inconsistent across sources, and that inconsistency is a genuine buyer-facing issue rather than a resolved detail.

Platforms used different names for the same recommendation. Anthropic listed "Mutual of Omaha Discover IUL - Income Advantage IUL." Deepseek listed "Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL (also marketed as Discover IUL / Indexed Universal Life)." Grok, Kimi, and Perplexity listed "Income Advantage IUL." OpenAI described "Income AdvantageSM IUL, underwritten by United of Omaha Life Insurance Company; product materials also identify it as Discover IUL / Income Advantage IUL." Deepseek explicitly flagged that whether "Discover IUL" and "Income Advantage IUL" refer to the same or distinct products is unclear from the sources it reviewed [8].

Product mechanics reported across platforms: issue ages 0–85 with a minimum face amount of $100,000 [9]; a 0% floor with four crediting strategies including S&P 500 100% participation with a 10% cap, 140% participation with a 7% cap, uncapped options, and a BofA Agility uncapped option, using annual point-to-point crediting [11]; up to 12 segments per index interest crediting strategy, each maturing one year after it begins [13]; and flexible premiums to age 120 with an adjustable death benefit [15]. The 0% floor means negative index performance does not produce negative indexed interest crediting, but policy charges still reduce accumulation value, and a 0% floor does not guarantee the policy remains in force [16].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What did the AI platforms agree on about Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL for buyers in their 40s?
  • Is Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL backed by strong carrier financial strength for a multi-decade policy?

Agreement was strong on carrier financial strength, product structure, and the 0% floor — and limited or absent on cost competitiveness.

Six of seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment. Four rated the product a "good" fit (openai, anthropic, grok, perplexity); deepseek rated it "mixed"; kimi rated it "uncertain." No platform rated it best-in-class.

On financial strength, the platforms converged. Mutual of Omaha states that United of Omaha Life Insurance Company is part of its insurance group and reports A+ ratings from AM Best, S&P Global, and Moody's with stable outlooks [17]. AM Best independently reported an A+ Superior rating for Mutual of Omaha and its subsidiaries, including United of Omaha, effective April 2, 2026 [19]. S&P affirmed Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. at A+ / Stable in August 2026 [21]. AM Best disclosure reports show A+ Superior and Stable outlook with very strong balance sheet strength [22].

On structure, platforms agreed the policy is permanent, offers flexible premiums, and provides an adjustable death benefit [24]. On downside protection, platforms agreed the indexed-crediting floor is 0% [28]. On the Guaranteed Refund Option, platforms agreed the rider is included at no additional cost on qualifying policies and provides surrender windows returning 50% of premiums at year 15 or 100% at years 20–25 [31].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Do the AI platforms disagree about whether Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL has competitive policy charges?
  • What is unverified about Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL's caps, participation rates, and pricing?

The sharpest disagreement concerns policy charges. Anthropic reported "industry-leading low charges" and "one of the cleanest chassis designs in the industry," citing independent review sources [36]. OpenAI stated that public materials reviewed do not establish that Income Advantage has the lowest or most competitive policy charges [41]. Perplexity noted the lower-charge and competitive cash-value positioning is primarily company-claimed in the sources reviewed [42]. Kimi found no product-specific cap rates, participation rates, or charge structures for Income Advantage IUL in its search results [43].

Grok supplied the only numeric charge detail: a current premium charge of 4.5% up to target and 3% on excess, a guaranteed 10% premium charge, a monthly expense charge of $8 plus a per-$1,000 specified-amount charge, and surrender charges in the first 14 years [44]. No other platform corroborated those figures, and they should be treated as platform-reported and unverified.

Other unresolved items: exact current caps, participation rates, loan terms, and rider availability may differ by state, issue date, underwriting class, and policy design [41]; the Guaranteed Refund Option is not available for substandard or tobacco cases under age 50 or substandard tables 5–16 at ages 50+ [46]; and the refund is capped at 80% of the policy's lowest specified amount in certain circumstances [46]. Deepseek's research date was 2026-06-01, earlier than the other platforms' 2026-09-21 responses, and it ran without search enabled.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features make Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL suitable for a 40-year-old buyer who wants decades of coverage?
  • Does Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL offer tax-advantaged cash value access for retirement income?

The features most relevant to a 40s buyer are permanent coverage, flexible funding, multiple crediting strategies, a 0% floor, and policy access through loans or withdrawals.

Permanent coverage and long horizon. Income Advantage can remain in force until age 90 or older as long as coverage does not lapse [47]. For a buyer in their 40s, the long coverage horizon can allow time for cash-value accumulation, but results depend on premium funding, policy charges, credited rates, death-benefit design, loans or withdrawals, and future insurer-declared rates; public materials do not establish a guaranteed long-term cash-value outcome [48].

Flexible funding. Universal life insurance offers flexible premiums, allowing payment adjustments after the initial premium [50], and universal life includes an adjustable death benefit allowing coverage to increase or decrease over time [51]. Income Advantage offers flexible premium payments and multiple index crediting strategies [52].

Crediting structure. The product offers a fixed account and three indexed-crediting approaches: 100% participation with a mid-range cap, higher participation with a lower cap, and lower participation with no cap; indexed interest uses an annual point-to-point method and is subject to declared caps or participation rates [48]. Caps are typically non-guaranteed and subject to change by the insurer [53].

Tax treatment. Cash value grows tax-deferred, policy loans and withdrawals may be tax-free if structured properly, and the death benefit is income-tax-free [54]. Mutual of Omaha states that when a policy is designed properly, distributions and the death benefit will not be taxed [56]. This is company-reported.

Living and refund benefits. Accelerated death benefit riders for chronic and terminal illness are included at no additional cost, and the Guaranteed Refund Option rider is included at no additional cost on qualifying policies [57]. The Guaranteed Refund Option allows surrender for 50% of premiums at the 15th anniversary or 100% at the 20th–25th anniversaries [59].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL cost per month for a healthy nonsmoker in their 40s?
  • What fees and surrender charges apply to Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL, and when do they end?

No public universal premium quote or complete current charge schedule was verified for Income Advantage IUL. Pricing confidence across platforms was low, except grok, which reported moderate confidence based on a product portfolio document.

IUL pricing is individualized based on age, sex, tobacco use, health, death-benefit amount, underwriting class, premium pattern, riders, and policy design [61]. Buyers should rely on the actual state-specific illustration and policy contract rather than historical credited-rate examples [61].

Known cost components. Premiums required to keep the policy in force under the selected design; policy charges and cost-of-insurance deductions, which the public consumer brochure confirms reduce accumulation value but does not fully itemize [61]; potential interest and other economic effects from policy loans or withdrawals; and possible rider and state-specific charges [61]. Cost of insurance increases with age [62].

Platform-reported charge figures. Grok reported a current premium charge of 4.5% up to target and 3% on excess, a guaranteed 10% premium charge, a monthly expense charge of $8 plus a per-$1,000 specified-amount charge, and surrender charges in the first 14 years [64]. These figures are platform-reported and were not corroborated by other platforms.

Industry benchmarks, not product-specific. IUL fees typically total 2–4% annually and include premium loads, admin fees, mortality charges, policy expenses, and surrender charges [65]. First-year fees can consume 30–50% of premium, decreasing over time [66]. Typical surrender schedules start at 10% in year one and decline by 1% annually until zero by year 11 [67]. Premium loads typically run 5–9%, administrative fees $5–15 per month, and surrender charges apply for 10–15 years [63]. Target monthly premiums for a $1.5 million IUL at age 40 range from $837 to $963 for certain index options [68]. These are industry figures, not Income Advantage IUL quotes.

Contract terms. The policy is subject to lapse risk if cash value and premiums are insufficient to cover charges [61]. Surrendering or withdrawing value can reduce cash value and death benefits and may create tax consequences [61]. There is no ordinary subscription-style cancellation term; applicable free-look, surrender, lapse, reinstatement, and loan provisions are contract- and state-specific [61]. Grok reported surrender charges in years 1–14 [64], while anthropic reported a typical 10-year declining schedule as an industry norm [67]. These are not the same claim and the difference should be verified in the contract.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL best suited for among buyers in their 40s?
  • Is Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL a good choice for a buyer who wants permanent coverage with cash value potential?

It is best suited to a buyer prioritizing permanent coverage with flexible indexed-crediting choices and long holding-period potential, who is comfortable funding an IUL consistently for decades and reviewing in-force performance periodically, and who values the financial-strength profile of Mutual of Omaha and United of Omaha [69].

Platforms converged on a similar profile: healthy nonsmoking individuals in their 40s with permanent life insurance needs and multi-decade horizons; those prioritizing cash-value accumulation over pure death-benefit affordability; buyers seeking competitive policy charges with strong carrier financial stability; those who value flexible premium payment options and can commit to active policy management; and higher-income earners comfortable with IUL complexity who want tax-deferred growth with downside protection [70]. Perplexity added buyers who want a policy with a guaranteed refund option and surrender flexibility during early years [74]. Grok noted issue ages and underwriting classes fit healthy 40s nonsmokers, with multiple non-tobacco classes including Preferred Plus NT [76].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL for Indexed Universal Life Insurance for People in Their 40s?
  • Is Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL a poor fit for a buyer who cannot fund a policy consistently for 20 or more years?

It is probably not best suited to a buyer seeking the lowest-cost death benefit, for whom term life insurance may be more efficient; a buyer seeking transparent, guaranteed accumulation or guaranteed retirement income; or a buyer unwilling to monitor caps, participation rates, policy charges, loans, and lapse risk over time [78].

Additional exclusions reported by platforms: buyers seeking simple, fully guaranteed returns with no caps or complexity; those prioritizing the lowest-cost pure death benefit, for whom Life Protection Advantage IUL may be better; individuals uncomfortable actively monitoring caps, participation rates, and policy charges annually; those unable to commit to consistent premium payments for 20+ years; and consumers who lack the financial resources to adequately fund the policy long-term [79]. Kimi noted IUL is generally designed for buyers with 20+ year horizons who have already maxed out 401(k) and IRA contributions [82]. Buyers who need fully transparent, quote-level cost comparisons before deciding may also be poorly served, since public pricing is not disclosed [83].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL for a buyer who needs guaranteed cash value or simpler mechanics?
  • When should a 40-year-old buyer choose term life or a different permanent policy instead of Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL?

Another option may be better in four recurring situations the platforms identified.

If a lower-cost temporary death benefit is the priority, compare individually underwritten level-term life insurance before considering permanent coverage [86]. If the buyer wants guarantees and simpler accumulation mechanics, compare guaranteed universal life or participating whole life, recognizing that each has different flexibility, costs, and guarantees [86]. If the buyer wants maximum investment transparency and liquidity, compare buying term insurance and investing separately, while recognizing the tax, behavioral, and insurance differences [86]. If the buyer is primarily seeking retirement income rather than lifetime death-benefit protection, compare retirement-account, annuity, and investment solutions with qualified professionals [86].

Platform-specific alternatives: Mutual of Omaha whole life policies for simple, fully guaranteed returns; Mutual of Omaha Life Protection Advantage IUL where the primary goal is lowest-cost death benefit without significant cash-value accumulation; whole life or traditional universal life for buyers uncomfortable with annual cap and participation monitoring; term life plus separate investments for buyers with inconsistent income; and Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) where the buyer seeks tax-free growth but cannot meet IUL minimum funding requirements [87]. Kimi noted buyers who have not maxed out 401(k) or IRA contributions should prioritize those first, and that 30-year term life costs a fraction of permanent coverage for temporary income replacement or mortgage protection [89].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL before signing a contract?
  • Which illustration scenarios and charge disclosures should a 40-year-old buyer request before buying Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL?

Verify these items before signing, drawn from the platforms' combined verification lists.

Issuing entity and state terms. Which legal entity will issue the policy in the buyer's state, and whether the base plan, riders, and features vary by state [91].

Illustrated values. The guaranteed and current illustrated values at years 10, 20, 30, 40, and later under conservative, current, and adverse assumptions, and how the policy performs at conservatively illustrated rates of 4–5% versus company-illustrated rates [91]. Ask for illustrations at 4% and 2% below original assumptions for stress testing [95].

Funding requirements. The target premium, minimum premium, planned funding duration, and maximum premium before modified-endowment or other tax treatment changes [91]. Also ask what happens if premiums are reduced, skipped, paid late, or stopped after 10, 20, or 30 years [91].

Exact charges. Premium loads, monthly policy fees, cost-of-insurance rates, surrender charges, rider charges, and any expense or index-account charges [91]. Ask how these compare to named competitors [96].

Crediting terms. Current caps, participation rates, spreads, floors, and fixed-account rates, plus which can be changed by the insurer and what the guaranteed minimums are [91]. Ask how often caps and participation rates have changed in the past 3–5 years [96].

Loan and lapse mechanics. Fixed and variable loan rates, loan-crediting treatment, withdrawal rules, and lapse consequences [91]. Ask what happens if funding is reduced after issue and how that affects any no-lapse or secondary guarantees [93].

Product identity. Whether "Discover IUL" is the same product as "Income Advantage IUL" or a separate policy [99].

Guaranteed Refund Option eligibility. Whether the buyer qualifies given age and health status, and what alternatives exist if not [100].

Comparison shopping. How the proposed design compares with at least two competing IUL illustrations using the same death benefit, premiums, underwriting assumptions, and illustration methodology [91].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Good fit, with important qualification. Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL has relevant strengths for a healthy person in their 40s: permanent protection, flexible indexed and fixed crediting choices, policy-access features, a 0% indexed-crediting floor, and strong reported insurer financial strength [101]. It should not be labeled best-in-class without a state-specific illustration and charge comparison, because future caps and participation rates are adjustable, policy charges are not fully transparent in the public materials reviewed, and non-guaranteed cash-value results may differ materially from illustrated results [101].

The platform split matters: four of six assessing platforms rated it good, one mixed, one uncertain. No platform rated it best-in-class, and no platform produced an independent cost benchmark against named competitors. AI-platform agreement on carrier strength and product structure does not prove product quality or cost competitiveness.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven configured platforms for the question of which life insurance carriers suit a healthy nonsmoking consumer in their 40s seeking permanent indexed universal life insurance with meaningful death-benefit protection and long-term cash-value potential. Three platforms named Mutual of Omaha Income Advantage IUL during ranking discovery; six returned a usable fit assessment. The study date is 2026-09-20. Platform-reported research dates were 2026-09-21 for anthropic, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity, and 2026-06-01 for deepseek. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned sources are distinguished from independent sources in the Sources section.

Methodology Limitations

Six of seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment; the fit findings are therefore not unanimous. Platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date and are provenance metadata that do not independently prove freshness. Deepseek ran without search enabled, so its findings rest on model knowledge rather than retrieved sources. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. Public materials do not demonstrate that policy charges are especially competitive versus other IUL carriers, and no buyer-specific premium, death-benefit amount, underwriting class, or guaranteed-versus-current value comparison was available. Product features, riders, and availability vary by state. Historical credited rates are not forecasts or guarantees. IUL illustrations can show attractive non-guaranteed outcomes that may not occur.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence104 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:26-1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    6. AI research evidence record grok:web:16
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:35-1
    10. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    11. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    12. AI research evidence record grok:web:2
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-8
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-9
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:26-1
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    20. AI research evidence record grok:web:16
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:c9
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-2
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-3
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    28. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-7
    30. AI research evidence record grok:web:2
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-2
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-3
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-4
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-8
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-11
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-9
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-10
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c10
    43. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul-pros-cons
    44. AI research evidence record grok:web:2
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-4
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-8
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-3
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-10
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-17
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-6
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-1
    58. AI research evidence record grok:web:2
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-3
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul-pros-cons
    63. AI research evidence record kimi:evolvelegacy-iul-cost
    64. AI research evidence record grok:web:2
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-12
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-13
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-8
    68. AI research evidence record kimi:simplyinsurance-1
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-1
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    74. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    76. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    77. AI research evidence record grok:web:2
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-4
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-10
    82. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul-pros-cons
    83. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    84. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    85. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    86. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-2
    89. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul-pros-cons
    90. AI research evidence record kimi:rateschaser-iul-guide
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    93. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:42-2
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-iul-pros-cons
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-4
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-8
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-10
    99. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-4
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c3

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
46
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#7

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

28 independent · 17 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

17 direct · 10 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

12d535b96e4fabd204c0aa9fbfa1fb4668e9ca21d0f785bfdd557f2c4e248582