Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Corebridge Financial Term Life Insurance Fit Review for People in Their 40s

Corebridge Financial is a good, but not decisive, fit for a nonsmoking buyer in their 40s seeking $500,000 of 20-year term coverage.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Corebridge Financial is a good, but not decisive, fit for a nonsmoking buyer in their 40s seeking $500,000 of 20-year term coverage. Two of seven platforms named Corebridge during the ranking stage (google, kimi), and its strongest case rests on Select-a-Term's 18 term-length options, convertible coverage, and A (Excellent) A.M. Best financial-strength rating. The main limitation is service quality: independent reviews report complaint volumes roughly three times the industry average and a 3.1-out-of-5 J.D. Power score, plus unresolved rating uncertainty tied to the proposed Equitable Holdings merger. Exact premiums require underwriting, so Corebridge should be quoted against several carriers rather than accepted on reputation alone.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (google, kimi)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank4.5
Best listed rank4 (google)
Relevant product/model/planSelect-a-Term
Overall use-case fitGood (per openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok); strong (google); mixed (perplexity); uncertain (kimi)
Research date2026-09-20

Why Corebridge Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Corebridge Financial a good choice for term life insurance for people in their 40s who want $500,000 for 20 years?
  • Why did only two of seven AI platforms name Corebridge Financial during the ranking stage?

Corebridge Financial qualified because it cleared the study's minimum-mention threshold and every included platform evaluated it as a fit candidate for this buyer profile. Two of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery — google at rank 4 and kimi at rank 5 — producing an average listed rank of 4.5 and a 28.6% share of included platform responses. All seven platforms then produced a full fit assessment, and all seven identified Select-a-Term as the relevant product.

The qualification is not the same as a top ranking. Corebridge's final rank in the study was 9, and its fit ratings split across platforms: google rated it "strong," openai, anthropic, deepseek, and grok rated it "good," perplexity rated it "mixed," and kimi rated it "uncertain." That spread is itself the finding — Corebridge is broadly considered viable for this use case but not unanimously preferred.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Term Life Insurance for People in Their 40s

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Corebridge Financial plan should a buyer in their 40s choose for $500,000 of 20-year term coverage?
  • Does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term offer 20-year terms and a $500,000 coverage amount?

Select-a-Term is the Corebridge product that matches this use case, and all seven platforms named it. Public descriptions report 18 term-length options — 10 years, 15 years, every year from 16 to 30, and 35 years — with coverage from $100,000 to more than $1 million, so a 20-year, $500,000 policy falls inside the reported range [1].

The product is structured with level premiums that stay constant for the chosen term [7]. It is described as convertible to permanent coverage, with conversion available up to the end of the level-premium period or age 70, whichever comes first, and without new evidence of insurability [8]. An accelerated death benefit for terminal illness is reported as automatically included [12].

Two qualifiers matter. First, base plans, provisions, features, and riders may vary by state, and Select-a-Term has separate New York and non-New York policy forms [14]. Second, public sources differ on how they describe term increments and available lengths, so the exact policy form and a state-specific illustration should control [1].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term for a 40-something nonsmoker?
  • Is Corebridge Financial considered a financially strong carrier for 20-year term life insurance?

Agreement was strong on product structure and financial strength, and mixed-to-negative on customer experience. Four points drew support from multiple platforms.

Product fit. Every platform identified Select-a-Term as the relevant product, and multiple platforms confirmed that 20-year coverage and a $500,000 face amount fall within the reported range [15].

Conversion and living benefits. Multiple platforms reported conversion to permanent coverage without new underwriting, plus an automatically included terminal-illness accelerated death benefit [19].

Financial strength. Corebridge's published ratings page lists A+ from S&P, A2 from Moody's, A from A.M. Best, and A+ from Fitch for the issuing insurers [24]. A.M. Best affirmed an A (Excellent) rating for Corebridge members as of January 23, 2026 [26].

Customer-experience weakness. Independent reviews report complaints well above expectations for the company's size and a low J.D. Power ranking [15]. This was the most consistent negative across platforms.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term cost per month for a 40-year-old nonsmoker, and why do platform estimates differ?
  • Is Corebridge Financial's financial strength rating stable, or is the Equitable Holdings merger creating uncertainty?

Platforms disagreed on pricing, underwriting reliability, and how much weight to give the pending merger.

Pricing. NerdWallet sample data lists $28.22 per month for a 40-year-old nonsmoking man and $23.80 for a 40-year-old nonsmoking woman for $500,000 of 20-year coverage in excellent health [33]. Google cited Compulife data showing roughly $23.80 per month for a 40-year-old female and $44.78 for a 45-year-old male at Preferred Plus [36]. Corebridge's own direct site gives a different example — $250,000 of coverage from $13 per month for a 35-year-old in Preferred Plus class [37]. These are different ages, coverage amounts, terms, and underwriting assumptions, not necessarily contradictory quotes, but they cannot be compared directly.

Underwriting reliability. Corebridge markets accelerated underwriting through SimpliNow Choice and Agile Underwriting+ [38]. RiskQuoter, an independent review, reports that SimpliNow "often declines healthy applicants for vague reasons" and is not reliable for even slightly complex health profiles [42]. Google reported that Agile Underwriting+ is limited to U.S. citizens or permanent residents with face amounts up to $1 million on Select-a-Term, and noted that third-party blogs sometimes cite a $3 million limit instead [44].

Merger uncertainty. A.M. Best placed Corebridge member ratings under review with developing implications after the announced all-stock merger with Equitable Holdings, expected to close by year-end 2026 subject to approvals [45].

Platform disagreement on overall fit. Kimi rated Corebridge "uncertain," reporting that no independent 2026 pricing, NAIC complaint index, or A.M. Best rating specific to Corebridge was found in its searched sources [49]. That conflicts with other platforms that retrieved those figures. The disagreement reflects search coverage differences, not a factual dispute about the product.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term offer a 40-year-old buyer who may want to convert to permanent coverage later?
  • Does Corebridge Financial offer no-exam underwriting for a $500,000 term policy?

Select-a-Term's most distinctive feature for this buyer is term-length granularity. With 18 options including every year from 16 to 30, a buyer can match the policy to a specific liability timeline rather than rounding to the nearest five-year increment [51].

Conversion is the second differentiator. Multiple platforms report conversion to permanent coverage without new underwriting, available up to the end of the level-premium period or age 70, whichever comes first [54]. Google additionally reported a conversion credit that reduces first-year premiums on the new permanent policy [58].

Underwriting pathways are mixed in reliability. Corebridge offers fully underwritten, accelerated, and no-exam options depending on eligibility [59]. AU+ (Agile Underwriting+) is described as covering more than 60% of term applications without labs or exam, though a final decision may still require labs or records [60]. The independent caution about SimpliNow Choice declining healthy applicants is a material caveat for a buyer whose main goal is a fast, predictable approval [62].

Underwriting leniency is a reported strength for some profiles. Independent sources describe Corebridge as accessible for applicants with certain pre-existing conditions and note a BMI up to 31.5 can qualify for a preferred rate class [64]. Google reported the opposite direction for mental health conditions, noting Corebridge is less favorable for applicants with anxiety or depression [68].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term cost per month for $500,000 of 20-year coverage, and are there policy fees?
  • What happens to Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term premiums after the 20-year level term ends?

No verified public quote exists for this exact buyer profile, and pricing confidence across platforms ranged from low to high. The most-cited sample figures are $28.22 per month for a 40-year-old nonsmoking man and $23.80 for a 40-year-old nonsmoking woman, for $500,000 of 20-year coverage in excellent health, generated October 23, 2025 [69]. Those are super-preferred sample rates, not quotes for average-to-good health, and NerdWallet notes they do not apply in New York [72].

Google reported a built-in level annual policy fee of $64 for face amounts of $250,000 and above, and up to a $500 administrative fee if terminal-illness accelerated benefits are claimed [73]. Other platforms reported no verified separate policy fee for this profile [69]. That is a direct conflict buyers should resolve with the carrier.

Contract terms are more consistent. Premiums are level and guaranteed for the chosen term [76]. Coverage ends at the end of the term unless renewed or converted, and pure term policies build no cash value [78]. After the level period, coverage is described as annually renewable to age 95 at significantly higher rates [79]. A free-look period typically applies, with the exact duration varying by state [78]. A suicide clause limits the death benefit to a return of premiums during the first two years [77].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term best suited for among 40-something term life insurance buyers?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a good fit for a buyer who wants flexible term lengths and conversion rights?

Corebridge Select-a-Term is best suited for a buyer who prioritizes carrier scale, term-length precision, and future conversion rights over service rankings. The platforms converged on three buyer profiles.

Buyers who want a financially established carrier. Corebridge reported $385 billion in assets under management and 4 million life insurance policies in force as of 2025, with A (Excellent) A.M. Best ratings [81].

Buyers who want to match term length to a specific financial milestone. The 18 term options, including every year from 16 to 30, let a buyer align coverage to a mortgage payoff, a child's graduation, or another dated obligation [84].

Buyers who may convert to permanent coverage later. Conversion without new evidence of insurability, up to the end of the level-premium period or age 70, is the strongest structural feature for a 40-something buyer whose needs may change [86].

Buyers whose individualized quote is competitive. Multiple platforms describe Corebridge rates as competitive or top-5-to-top-10 nationally for healthy applicants, but none verified that for this exact profile [89].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Corebridge Financial for term life insurance in their 40s?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a bad choice for a buyer who cares most about customer service and complaint history?

Corebridge is probably not the best fit for buyers who weight service quality heavily. Independent reviews report complaints roughly three times the industry average and a 3.1-out-of-5 J.D. Power overall performance score [93]. NerdWallet ranked Corebridge No. 19 out of 22 companies in J.D. Power's 2025 U.S. Life Insurance Study [97].

Buyers who want a fully self-serve online purchase should also look elsewhere. Independent reviews report no self-serve online application; buyers initiate by phone or website form and complete the process with agent assistance [98].

Buyers who need reliable no-exam approval should treat the accelerated pathway with caution. RiskQuoter's report that SimpliNow Choice declines healthy applicants for vague reasons is a direct counterweight to the marketing claim of real-time approvals [99].

Buyers who need guaranteed pricing before underwriting, or who require unusually favorable conversion terms, are also flagged as poor fits [97].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Corebridge Financial for a 40-year-old who wants the lowest verified premium?
  • When should a buyer choose a different carrier than Corebridge Financial for 20-year term life insurance?

Another carrier may be better in four specific situations, based on platform-reported comparisons.

When the lowest verified premium is the priority. Kimi reported Banner Life and Transamerica at $37 per month for females and $46 per month for males for a 20-year, $500,000 policy at age 40, with documented A+ A.M. Best ratings [101]. Those figures are platform-reported and were not independently verified in this study.

When no-exam convenience matters most. Kimi reported Nationwide offers no-exam simplified-issue term life up to $1.5 million for ages 21–55, and Banner Life up to $4 million [103].

When customer experience is a primary decision factor. Anthropic recommended carriers with lower complaint volumes, naming New York Life, MassMutual, and Guardian Life as examples [104].

When the buyer wants comprehensive living benefits built into a standard term policy. Google noted that Select-a-Term lacks built-in chronic or critical illness benefits, requiring the separate QoL Flex Term product for those features [105].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Corebridge Financial before signing a Select-a-Term contract?
  • How can a buyer verify Corebridge Financial's conversion terms, riders, and issuing insurer before purchase?

The platforms collectively listed verification items that public materials do not resolve. Buyers should confirm the guaranteed monthly or annual premium for $500,000, 20 years, their exact age, state, sex, health class, and nonsmoking status [107].

They should confirm whether underwriting requires a medical exam, labs, prescription-history review, or attending-physician statement, and whether the applicant qualifies for AU+ or SimpliNow Choice [107].

They should confirm the exact conversion deadline, which permanent products are eligible, and whether new evidence of insurability or higher conversion charges apply [107].

They should confirm whether the terminal-illness accelerated benefit is included at no additional premium, what percentage or amount may be accelerated, and whether any administrative fee applies to a claim [107].

They should confirm which riders are available in their state and what they cost, which legal insurer will issue the policy, and what ratings and ownership structure will apply at issue [107].

They should confirm the merger timeline and whether existing Select-a-Term policies will be affected during integration [117].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term is a good, not decisive, fit for a nonsmoking buyer in their 40s seeking $500,000 of 20-year term coverage. The consensus case rests on three verified-in-research strengths: 18 term-length options including 20 years, conversion to permanent coverage without new underwriting, and A (Excellent) A.M. Best financial-strength ratings [119]. The consensus case against rests on service quality — complaints roughly three times the industry average and a 3.1-out-of-5 J.D. Power score — plus unresolved rating uncertainty tied to the Equitable Holdings merger [123].

Platform fit ratings split: google "strong," openai, anthropic, deepseek, and grok "good," perplexity "mixed," kimi "uncertain." That spread is not proof of product quality in either direction; it reflects different search coverage and different weighting of service factors. The practical conclusion is that Corebridge merits a quote for this buyer, but the buyer should not accept it without comparing the final underwritten premium and conversion terms against several carriers.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms — openai, anthropic, google, grok, deepseek, perplexity, and kimi — each asked which life insurance carriers they would recommend for a nonsmoking consumer in their 40s with average-to-good health seeking $500,000 of 20-year term coverage. Two of seven platforms named Corebridge Financial during the ranking stage; all seven produced a full fit assessment. Platform fit ratings, product identifications, pricing examples, and limitations were extracted as supplied. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The study research date is 2026-09-20.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: deepseek reported 2026-05-08 while the other six platforms reported 2026-09-20. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Deepseek's response was generated with search disabled, so its claims are model-reported rather than retrieved. Kimi reported that it could not locate Corebridge pricing, NAIC complaint data, or A.M. Best ratings in its searched sources, which conflicts with other platforms that retrieved those figures; this reflects search coverage differences rather than a factual dispute.

No verified public quote exists for this exact buyer profile. Sample rates cited across platforms assume excellent or super-preferred health and may understate premiums for average-to-good health. Public sources also differ on term increments, policy fees, and accelerated-underwriting coverage limits. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. AI-platform agreement does not establish product quality, and no platform performed personal testing or independent verification of carrier claims.

See the broader Term Life Insurance for People in Their 40s consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

From the index

Compare the adjacent findings before forming a view.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Corebridge Financial - Financials - Ratings: https://investors.corebridgefinancial.com/financials/Ratings/default.aspx
  • Request a Quote - Term Life Insurance - SiteLinks: https://www.corebridgedirect.com/request-a-quote-term-life-insurance
  • Tailor-made for your clients: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/content/campaigns/role-based-activity/master/marketing-role-based-activity/finance-exp/term-life-experiencefragment0/jcr:content/par.html
  • Term Life Insurance | Corebridge Financial - Individual: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/content/experience-fragments/marketing/corporate/en/corporate_site_new/wwo---term-life-individual----1st-button/wwo---term-life-individual----1st-button/_jcr_content/root/container_copy_copy_/image_copy.coreimg.90.1400.jpeg/1754062017502/1920x600-full-2193685130.jpeg
  • Corebridge Financial Official Website: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/home
  • Life Insurance Quotes and Coverage - Corebridge Financial: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/individuals-families/life-insurance
  • Term Life Insurance - Corebridge Financial: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/individuals-families/life-insurance/term-life-insurance
  • Select-a-Term Term Life Insurance - Corebridge Financial: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/individuals-families/life-insurance/term-life-insurance/select-a-term
  • Life Insurance Underwriting - Corebridge Financial: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/individuals-families/life-insurance/underwriting
  • Corebridge Financial Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/newsroom/press-releases/corebridge-financial-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2023-results
  • Term Life Insurance | Corebridge Financial - Individual: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/what-we-offer/life-insurance/term-life
  • Additional AI research evidence125 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-16
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-17
    5. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    6. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-15
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:9
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-10
    13. AI research evidence record grok:23
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-10
    22. AI research evidence record google:2.1.7
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    25. AI research evidence record grok:16
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-1
    27. AI research evidence record grok:15
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-6
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-13
    31. AI research evidence record grok:0
    32. AI research evidence record grok:2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-6
    35. AI research evidence record grok:12
    36. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-3
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-4
    40. AI research evidence record perplexity:15
    41. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-5
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-6
    44. AI research evidence record google:2.2.9
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-3
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-3
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-4
    49. AI research evidence record kimi:corebridge_site
    50. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_term_2026
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-16
    53. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:9
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-4
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-7
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-8
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-5
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-6
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:33-2
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:34-1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-5
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-6
    68. AI research evidence record google:2.1.5
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-6
    71. AI research evidence record grok:12
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-8
    73. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:2
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-15
    77. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    78. AI research evidence record deepseek:c7
    79. AI research evidence record perplexity:8
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-1
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    84. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-16
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-4
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-11
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:33-1
    92. AI research evidence record grok:1
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-8
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-15
    96. AI research evidence record grok:0
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-4
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-5
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-6
    101. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_rates_2026
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_term_2026
    103. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_40_2026
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    105. AI research evidence record google:2.1.5
    106. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-7
    109. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    110. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-8
    111. AI research evidence record perplexity:15
    112. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    113. AI research evidence record deepseek:c6
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-10
    115. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    116. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    117. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-4
    118. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    119. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    121. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-1
    122. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    123. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    124. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-15
    125. AI research evidence record openai:c4

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Select-a-Term: https://adminplus.fgsfulfillment.com/View/corebridgefinancial/1/AGLC202276
  • 18 term periods. Protection tailored to your needs: https://findinsurewise.com/carriers/guides/corebridge-select.pdf
  • Additional AI research evidence125 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-16
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-17
    5. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    6. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-15
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:9
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-10
    13. AI research evidence record grok:23
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-10
    22. AI research evidence record google:2.1.7
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    25. AI research evidence record grok:16
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-1
    27. AI research evidence record grok:15
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-6
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-13
    31. AI research evidence record grok:0
    32. AI research evidence record grok:2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-6
    35. AI research evidence record grok:12
    36. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-3
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-4
    40. AI research evidence record perplexity:15
    41. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-5
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-6
    44. AI research evidence record google:2.2.9
    45. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-3
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-3
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-4
    49. AI research evidence record kimi:corebridge_site
    50. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_term_2026
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-16
    53. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:9
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-4
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-7
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-8
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-5
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-6
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:33-2
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:34-1
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-5
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:37-6
    68. AI research evidence record google:2.1.5
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-6
    71. AI research evidence record grok:12
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-8
    73. AI research evidence record google:2.1.9
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:2
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-15
    77. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    78. AI research evidence record deepseek:c7
    79. AI research evidence record perplexity:8
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-1
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    84. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-16
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-3
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:4
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-4
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-11
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:33-1
    92. AI research evidence record grok:1
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-8
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-15
    96. AI research evidence record grok:0
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-4
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-5
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-6
    101. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_rates_2026
    102. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_term_2026
    103. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek_40_2026
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    105. AI research evidence record google:2.1.5
    106. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-7
    109. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    110. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-8
    111. AI research evidence record perplexity:15
    112. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    113. AI research evidence record deepseek:c6
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-10
    115. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    116. AI research evidence record perplexity:3
    117. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-4
    118. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    119. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:45-2
    121. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-1
    122. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    123. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    124. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-15
    125. AI research evidence record openai:c4

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
45
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#9

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

32 independent · 11 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

30 direct · 15 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

2960eb70f0c0f74dd3fb0e98c6cdd75db1aeb77bd713de900a90e92eec5dd168