Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Corebridge Financial Term Life Insurance Fit Review for $1 Million in Coverage

Corebridge Financial is a good, but not clearly best, fit for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $1 million of 20-year term coverage.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Corebridge Financial is a good, but not clearly best, fit for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $1 million of 20-year term coverage. Three of seven platforms named Corebridge during the ranking stage (google, kimi, perplexity), and all seven platforms that evaluated fit rated it good or strong. The strongest reason to consider it is Select-a-Term's combination of competitive illustrated pricing, a 20-year term option, and a possible accelerated underwriting path at the $1 million threshold. The main limitation is that conversion to all permanent products is restricted to roughly the first 8 to 10 years, and independent reviews report elevated complaint volume and weak customer-service rankings.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (google, kimi, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank3.33
Best listed rank1 (perplexity)
Relevant product/model/planSelect-a-Term, 20-year term option
Overall use-case fitStrong (2 platforms); Good (5 platforms) — 7 platforms analyzed
Research date2026-09-20

Why Corebridge Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Corebridge Financial a good choice for Term Life Insurance for $1 Million in Coverage?
  • Why did only three of seven AI platforms name Corebridge Financial in the ranking stage for $1 million term coverage?

Corebridge Financial qualified because it was named by three of the seven platforms during ranking discovery and because every platform that evaluated it rated the fit as good or strong. Its ranking-stage ranks were 5 (google), 4 (kimi), and 1 (perplexity), producing an average listed rank of 3.33 and a best rank of 1 [1].

The entity is Corebridge Financial, a publicly traded insurance and retirement company (NYSE: CRBG) that was formerly AIG's life and retirement business, which provides some evidence of scale and continuity for long-term obligations [2]. The relevant product is Select-a-Term, specifically the 20-year term option, which all seven platforms identified as the product matching this use case.

Qualification was not unanimous. Four of the seven platforms did not name Corebridge during ranking discovery, and one platform's independent 2024–2025 best-$1-million-term rankings did not list Corebridge or AIG among top-ranked carriers [3]. That gap is a ranking-stage observation, not a fit judgment: platforms that did not name it in ranking still evaluated it when asked.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Term Life Insurance for $1 Million in Coverage

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Corebridge Financial plan should a buyer choose for $1 million of 20-year term coverage?
  • Does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term allow a $1 million face amount for a 20-year term?

The relevant product is Select-a-Term with the 20-year term option. Select-a-Term offers 18 term durations, and the 20-year term is specifically listed [4]. Independent listings confirm the 20-year option among many available term lengths [5], and one source describes term lengths of 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 years [6].

Coverage amounts support this use case. Select-a-Term coverage starts at $100,000 and is available above $1 million [7], and one review states coverage amounts range from $100,000 to over $1 million [9]. A company-distributed comparison includes a $1 million 20-year example, though that example is for a 45-year-old preferred-plus nonsmoking male rather than the target 40-year-old [4].

Corebridge markets the product under a brand that covers multiple issuing insurers. Corebridge identifies American General life insurance Company and, in New York, The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York as relevant issuing insurers [10]. The exact issuing company depends on jurisdiction and policy application.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term for a healthy 40-year-old nonsmoker?
  • Is Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term competitively priced for $1 million of 20-year term coverage?

Platforms agreed on four points: product match, coverage capacity, conversion availability, and generally competitive pricing.

Product and term match. All seven platforms identified Select-a-Term as the relevant product and confirmed a 20-year term option exists [11].

Coverage capacity. Multiple platforms confirmed $1 million is within available face amounts, with coverage starting at $100,000 and extending above $1 million [18].

Conversion availability. Platforms agreed Select-a-Term includes a conversion privilege to permanent coverage without a new medical exam [21]. One conversion FAQ states no underwriting is required for the term conversion request form, though state-specific underwriting may apply in some cases [22].

Pricing competitiveness. Independent sources describe Corebridge as competitively priced. One directory lists Select-a-Term at $48.45 per month for a 40-year-old male Preferred Plus nonsmoker and $40.22 for a female equivalent at $1 million/20-year [23]. Another source places a $1 million 20-year quote in the least expensive category for its sample profile [25]. One review describes Corebridge pricing as roughly mid-market — competitive for living benefits but not lowest-cost for vanilla term [26].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • How long does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term allow conversion to all permanent products?
  • Is Corebridge Financial's financial-strength rating stable given the pending Equitable Holdings merger?

Platforms disagreed or were uncertain on conversion windows, financial-strength trajectory, pricing precision, and customer service.

Conversion window conflict. One company-distributed comparison states conversion is available until age 70, but conversion to all products is limited to the first 8 to 10 years depending on term [27]. A company page states full convertibility to a permanent plan is available up to the end of the level-premium period or age 70, whichever comes first [28]. A third source states conversion options run up to the 120th month for policies greater than 10 years, restricted to select permanent products afterward [30], and another states conversion to premier permanent products is restricted after the 10th policy year [31]. These statements are not fully reconcilable from the supplied evidence.

Financial-strength trajectory. Corebridge reports A.M. Best A, S&P A+, Moody's A2, and Fitch A+ ratings for its listed life-insurance companies, with outlook information including S&P CreditWatch negative and A.M. Best under review with developing implications [32]. One source states A.M. Best affirmed an A (Excellent) rating as of January 23, 2026 with a stable outlook [34], while the investor relations page as of April 8, 2026 shows A.M. Best under review with developing implications [33]. One platform reported an A+ (Superior) A.M. Best rating from Corebridge's own site [35], which conflicts with the A rating reported elsewhere. A pending all-stock merger with Equitable Holdings was announced in early 2026, with closing expected in late 2026 or 2027 pending regulatory approval [36].

Pricing precision. No platform produced a verified live quote for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old at $1 million/20-year. Available figures are illustrative: $83.91 monthly for a 45-year-old preferred-plus male [27], $48.45 male and $40.22 female Preferred Plus at age 40 [38], and a $500,000 sample of $20–28 monthly for a 35-year-old female [39]. One platform noted Corebridge does not publish exact 20-year $1 million rates for a 40-year-old [35].

Customer service conflict. One review reports a high complaint level relative to size, weak customer-service positioning, and no online purchase capability [40]. The same review source reports Corebridge ranked 19 of 22 companies in J.D. Power's 2025 U.S. Life Insurance Study and earned 3.1 of 5 stars overall [42]. By contrast, one review reported a complaint index of 0.45 in 2023, below the 1.0 average [44]. The discrepancy likely reflects different data timeframes and index methodologies.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term offer accelerated underwriting for a $1 million policy?
  • What living benefits does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term include for a $1 million policy?

Underwriting efficiency. Select-a-Term may use Agile Underwriting+ for applications up to $1 million through approved ticket platforms; unsuccessful streamlined cases can move to full underwriting [45]. One source states the AU+ program applies up to a total of $2 million of applied and inforce coverage [46], and another states AU+ offers a no-exam option for ages 20–59 up to $1 million [47]. One review states over 60% of term applications qualify for AU+ [48]. Corebridge states its application process is streamlined to provide an underwriting decision and policy delivery in 24–48 hours [49]. Independent sources caution that SimpliNow occasionally declines healthy applicants for vague reasons [52].

Conversion mechanics. Conversion is available without evidence of insurability [53]. A conversion credit equal to the annual term premium excluding riders is available within the first 8 years for a 10-year term and the first 10 years for 15+ year terms [54]. One source states conversion premiums may be based on attained age or original underwriting class, which the buyer should confirm [55].

Living benefits. Corebridge materials identify the Accelerated Access Solution as an optional rider that may accelerate some or all of the death benefit after a qualifying event [55]. One platform states the terminal illness accelerated benefit is capped at the lesser of $250,000 or 50% of the policy [56]. One source states Select-a-Term does not include built-in living benefits and that buyers must upgrade to the QOL term product for chronic or critical illness coverage [57]. Another states Select-a-Term lacks chronic and critical illness riders [59].

Renewability. Public sources state the policy is renewable annually after the level term, up to age 95 [60].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term cost per month for a healthy 40-year-old nonsmoker at $1 million?
  • Are there policy fees, rider charges, or cancellation penalties with Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term?

No publicly verified personalized premium was found for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $1 million for 20 years. The available figures are illustrative benchmarks, not quotes.

SourceProfileIllustrated premium
Company-distributed comparison45-year-old preferred-plus nonsmoking male, $1M/20-year$83.91/month (~$1,006.92/year)
Independent directory40-year-old Preferred Plus male, $1M/20-year$48.45/month
Independent directory40-year-old Preferred Plus female, $1M/20-year$40.22/month
Independent review35-year-old female, $500K/20-year$20–28/month

One platform reported a market average of $86/month (female) and $109/month (male) for a 40-year-old at $1M/20-year average health, with no-exam coverage costing slightly more [61]. Another reported a 20-year $500,000 example at roughly $278/year for a healthy 35-year-old [62].

Fees. No separate policy fee, rider charge, application fee, or underwriting fee was publicly verified in the sources reviewed [63]. One platform noted a possible administrative fee for an accelerated death benefit claim and standard administrative fees up to $500 for rider accelerations or administrative costs on customized options [62]. Rider costs are available but specific amounts are not disclosed in available materials [65].

Contract terms. The 20-year level premium period carries a fixed rate guarantee for the selected term [66]. At term end, the policy may renew annually at higher, annually increasing rates, convert to permanent insurance, or lapse [66]. One source notes a suicide clause limiting payout to a return of paid premiums within the first two years and a standard free-look period [64]. No noted penalties for early cancellation were found; standard surrender provisions apply [66].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term best suited for at $1 million of 20-year coverage?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a good fit for a buyer who wants a possible no-exam underwriting path at $1 million?

Corebridge Select-a-Term is best suited for buyers who prioritize a potentially competitive premium and a financially established carrier [68]. It also fits applicants who value a 20-year level-term policy with a possible accelerated underwriting path [70], and buyers who expect any permanent-policy conversion decision within the first 8 to 10 policy years [68].

One platform rated the fit "strong" and described Corebridge as best considered for healthy nonsmoking applicants ages 30–55 who prioritize low premiums for 10- and 20-year terms [72]. Another rated it "strong" for buyers wanting customized term lengths and fast AU+ underwriting up to $2 million [73]. A third described it as best for buyers who want a highly flexible term ladder with 20-year coverage and conversion options [75].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term for $1 million of 20-year term coverage?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a poor fit for buyers who prioritize customer service rankings?

Corebridge Select-a-Term is probably not best for buyers requiring conversion to all permanent products throughout the entire 20-year term [76]. It is also a weaker fit for buyers prioritizing the strongest available financial-strength ratings or superior service reputation [78], and for buyers seeking a fully transparent online purchase with publicly available personalized pricing [80].

One platform noted it is not best for buyers with complex health histories expecting extensive underwriting support, given high complaint volume [82]. Another noted it is not best for buyers wanting adjustable coverage mid-term, since Select-a-Term does not offer that feature [83]. A third noted it is not best for buyers needing robust built-in living benefits for chronic or critical illness without upgrading to a separate policy line [84].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Corebridge Financial for a buyer who needs the lowest verified premium at $1 million?
  • When should a buyer choose a different carrier than Corebridge Financial for a $1 million 20-year term policy?

Another option may be better in five situations.

Lowest verified premium. Choose a carrier with an A+ or A++ financial-strength rating when maximum carrier-strength preference outweighs possible premium savings, or use an independent broker or multi-carrier quoting platform when the primary objective is the lowest verified premium for the exact age, state, sex, underwriting class, and configuration [86]. One source states Banner Life or Protective Life may find slightly lower premiums for applicants under 40 in excellent health [87], and another states Corebridge is within pennies to $0.27/month of the absolute lowest alternatives [88].

Full-term conversion. Choose a product with all-products conversion for the entire term when long-term conversion flexibility is important [86].

Speed and digital completion. Consider a product with clearly documented accelerated underwriting or a fully digital application when purchase speed and online completion matter more than Corebridge's broader term menu [86]. One source notes Corebridge requires agent involvement, while competitors like Ethos or PolicyGenius offer streamlined online options [90].

No-exam convenience. Haven Simple offers up to $1 million no-exam for ages 20–55, underwritten by MassMutual [91], and Ladder allows coverage adjustment at any time with premium changes [92].

Service reputation. J.D. Power rankings and NAIC complaint data suggest other carriers provide a better service experience [93].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Corebridge Financial before signing a $1 million Select-a-Term contract?
  • Which legal insurer will issue the Corebridge Financial policy, and does that change the rating?

The following items should be confirmed directly with Corebridge or an independent broker before purchase.

  1. The exact annual and monthly premium for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old in the buyer's state with $1 million of Select-a-Term coverage for 20 years [95].
  2. Which legal insurance company will issue the policy in the buyer's state [96].
  3. Whether the application qualifies for Agile Underwriting+, and what tests or records will be required if it does not [97].
  4. For the exact policy form, which permanent products are available for conversion during years 1 through 10 and during years 11 through 20 [95].
  5. Whether conversion premiums are based on attained age, original underwriting class, or another method, and whether new medical underwriting requirements are waived [95].
  6. The costs and eligibility triggers for any Accelerated Access Solution or other riders [95].
  7. State-specific exclusions, aviation or travel restrictions, contestability provisions, and suicide provisions [95].
  8. Free-look, grace-period, reinstatement, payment-change, and cancellation rules [95].
  9. Whether the policy can be purchased or electronically signed without an agent, and the expected underwriting-to-issue timeline [102].
  10. Whether the issuing insurer's ratings or outlooks have changed since April 8, 2026 [96].
  11. The merger timeline and expected impacts on claims handling, underwriting standards, or conversion options [105].
  12. Post-term renewal premium rates, to understand cost if the buyer renews instead of converting [107].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Corebridge Financial Select-a-Term is a good fit, but not a clear best fit, for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $1 million of 20-year term coverage. All seven platforms that evaluated fit rated it good or strong, and three of seven named it during ranking discovery. The product matches the requested structure, supports $1 million in coverage, offers a possible accelerated underwriting path, and includes conversion availability without evidence of insurability.

The limitations are material. Conversion to all permanent products is restricted to roughly the first 8 to 10 years depending on term, and platforms disagreed on the exact window. A.M. Best's rating is A rather than the highest available tier, and its outlook is under review with developing implications. Independent 2026 review evidence reports elevated complaints and weak customer-service rankings. No platform produced a verified live quote for this exact profile.

The buyer should obtain an exact quote and confirm the restricted all-products conversion window, underwriting path, issuing insurer, rider costs, and current financial-strength outlook before selecting Corebridge over carriers with stronger ratings, better service evidence, or broader conversion rights.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from seven AI platform responses collected for the research date 2026-09-20. Each platform was asked which life insurance carriers it would recommend for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old seeking $1 million of 20-year term coverage with competitive premiums, financially established carriers, efficient underwriting, and useful conversion options. Three of seven platforms named Corebridge Financial during ranking discovery; all seven evaluated its fit.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-21, while deepseek reported 2026-02-14. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. Deepseek's response was produced with search disabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. The index ranking table and source list are rendered deterministically after generation.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-20; deepseek's response is dated 2026-02-14 and was produced without search enabled.
  • Platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery; all included platforms evaluated fit.
  • Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing; conflicts are described and buyers are told what to verify.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • No platform produced a verified live quote for a healthy nonsmoking 40-year-old at $1 million/20-year; all pricing figures are illustrative.
  • The cited underwriting guide is a financial-professional document and may not represent every state, distribution channel, or current application workflow.
  • Corebridge's public materials describe a marketing brand and multiple issuing insurers; the exact issuing company depends on jurisdiction and policy application.
  • Public sources reviewed did not verify the target buyer's exact premium, policy form, rider cost, state availability, or final conversion terms.
  • Customer-satisfaction metrics conflict across sources and likely reflect different data timeframes and index methodologies.
  • The pending Equitable Holdings merger introduces near-term corporate-stability uncertainty that the supplied evidence does not resolve.

See the broader Term Life Insurance for $1 Million in Coverage consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Corebridge Financial financial-strength ratings: https://investors.corebridgefinancial.com/financials/Ratings/default.aspx
  • Convertible Term Life Insurance Policies | Corebridge Direct: https://www.corebridgedirect.com/convertible-term-life-insurance
  • Term Life Insurance | Select-a-Term | Corebridge Financial: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/home
  • Term Life Insurance | Corebridge Financial - Individual: https://www.corebridgefinancial.com/what-we-offer/life-insurance/term-life
  • Additional AI research evidence108 records
    1. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    2. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    3. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-5
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    11. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    13. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    15. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    16. AI research evidence record grok:3
    17. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-5
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:43-3
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-cheapest
    24. AI research evidence record google:2.3.3
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-11
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-6
    27. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:40-6
    30. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    32. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-1
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-3
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-5
    38. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-cheapest
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:nerdwallet_review
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:46-8
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-13
    45. AI research evidence record openai:underwriting_guide
    46. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    47. AI research evidence record grok:11
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-2
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-13
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-1
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.3.2
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-9
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:43-3
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    55. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    56. AI research evidence record grok:0
    57. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.2.8
    59. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    61. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-rates
    62. AI research evidence record grok:0
    63. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    64. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-6
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    67. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    68. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:underwriting_guide
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-2
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-rates
    73. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    76. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    77. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    78. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    80. AI research evidence record openai:nerdwallet_review
    81. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    83. AI research evidence record kimi:nerdwallet-ladder
    84. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    85. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    86. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-14
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-rates
    89. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-8
    91. AI research evidence record kimi:termhaven-haven
    92. AI research evidence record kimi:nerdwallet-ladder
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    95. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    96. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    97. AI research evidence record openai:underwriting_guide
    98. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    99. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    100. AI research evidence record grok:0
    101. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    102. AI research evidence record openai:nerdwallet_review
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-13
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-1
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-3
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-5
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    108. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence108 records
    1. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    2. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    3. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-5
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    11. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    13. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    15. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    16. AI research evidence record grok:3
    17. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-5
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:43-3
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-cheapest
    24. AI research evidence record google:2.3.3
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-11
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-6
    27. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:40-6
    30. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    32. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-1
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-3
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-5
    38. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-cheapest
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:nerdwallet_review
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:46-8
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:12-13
    45. AI research evidence record openai:underwriting_guide
    46. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    47. AI research evidence record grok:11
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-2
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-13
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-1
    51. AI research evidence record google:1.3.2
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-9
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:43-3
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    55. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    56. AI research evidence record grok:0
    57. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.2.8
    59. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    61. AI research evidence record kimi:moneygeek-rates
    62. AI research evidence record grok:0
    63. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    64. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-6
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    67. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    68. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-1
    70. AI research evidence record openai:underwriting_guide
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:36-2
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-rates
    73. AI research evidence record google:2.2.5
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    75. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    76. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    77. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    78. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    80. AI research evidence record openai:nerdwallet_review
    81. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    83. AI research evidence record kimi:nerdwallet-ladder
    84. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    85. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    86. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-14
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:lifestein-rates
    89. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-8
    91. AI research evidence record kimi:termhaven-haven
    92. AI research evidence record kimi:nerdwallet-ladder
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    95. AI research evidence record openai:select_term_comparison
    96. AI research evidence record openai:corebridge_ratings
    97. AI research evidence record openai:underwriting_guide
    98. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    99. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    100. AI research evidence record grok:0
    101. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    102. AI research evidence record openai:nerdwallet_review
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-13
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:24-1
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-3
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-5
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-13
    108. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
50
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#7

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

38 independent · 9 company-owned · 3 unclear

Evidence support

38 direct · 12 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

02b70b127b50a3a468cbc63b9c45b2466fc9523aafa48fe5d334805ee0f7aed5