Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam Life Insurance After Being Declined Fit Review

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam is a mixed fit for a buyer who was previously declined for traditionally underwritten life insurance.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam is a mixed fit for a buyer who was previously declined for traditionally underwritten life insurance. Two of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, and those two ranked it 4th and 5th. The strongest reason to consider it is that it offers accelerated-underwriting term coverage up to $1.5 million with a fast digital decision and no routine medical exam for qualified applicants. The main limitation is that it is not guaranteed issue: Nationwide states it does not offer a guaranteed-issue product, approval is not guaranteed, and a prior decline can still result in a second decline.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage2 of 7 platforms (anthropic, grok)
Share of included platform responses28.6%
Average listed rank4.5
Best listed rank4
Relevant product/model/planNationwide Life Essentials no-exam term; Nationwide Life Essentials accelerated underwriting term
Overall use-case fitMixed
Research date2026-09-22

Why Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam qualify for a no-exam life insurance study after being declined?
  • Is Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam relevant for a buyer who was already declined for traditional life insurance?

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam qualified because it is a named, buyer-facing no-exam term product that appears in platform answers to a question about coverage after a traditional decline. It was named by two of the seven platforms whose responses were included (anthropic, grok), which is the minimum mention threshold for this study. Its listed ranks were 5 (anthropic) and 4 (grok), producing an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best listed rank of 4.

The product is relevant to the use case because it is explicitly marketed as no-exam term insurance with instant coverage up to $1.5 million for qualified applicants [1]. Nationwide also describes it as a digitally underwritten no-exam term product with an instant quote and detailed decision in minutes, available in 10- and 20-year terms [5].

Qualification for this study is not an endorsement. Five of the seven platforms did not name Nationwide Life Essentials during ranking discovery, and the two that did both rated it a mixed fit for this specific use case. This review evaluates the product only for No-Exam Life Insurance After Being Declined, not as a general company review. The broader set of carrier comparisons for this buyer situation is tracked in the No-Exam Life Insurance After Being Declined consensus index.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to No-Exam Life Insurance After Being Declined

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam plan is most relevant for a buyer who was declined for traditional life insurance?
  • Does Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam cover a declined applicant who needs up to $1.5 million in term coverage?

The relevant product is Nationwide Life Essentials no-exam term, also described in platform responses as Nationwide Life Essentials accelerated underwriting term. It is a term life policy, not a guaranteed-issue or final-expense product.

Nationwide states that Life Essentials is available in 10-year and 20-year terms with death benefits up to $1.5 million for qualified applicants [7]. The public quote page shows ages 21–55 and term lengths of 10–20 years [11]. Independent reviews describe the same age band and a death benefit range of $250,000 to $1.5 million [13].

The application asks health and lifestyle questions, and Nationwide explains that those questions are used to avoid a medical exam while noting that availability and rating factors vary [14]. Nationwide states that products are subject to underwriting guidelines, review, and approval, and that policy forms and issuing entities can vary by state [16].

Platform naming is not fully consistent. One platform labeled the product "accelerated underwriting term," another emphasized "no-exam term," and both refer to the same buyer-facing pathway [9]. The supplied product label "Nationwide Life Essentials (Accelerated Underwriting Term)" should be verified against the actual policy form and application path, because Nationwide uses accelerated-underwriting terminology across multiple life products.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • Do AI platforms agree that Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam is a good choice after being declined for life insurance?
  • What do AI platforms agree Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam still requires from a previously declined applicant?

Platforms agreed on the product's core structure: Life Essentials is a no-exam term product that still involves underwriting. Nationwide's own materials state that approval is not guaranteed and that simplified-issue coverage generally has higher pricing than more fully underwritten coverage [18]. Multiple platforms repeated that no-exam does not mean no underwriting [21].

Platforms also agreed on the headline coverage terms. The 10- and 20-year term options and the $1.5 million ceiling for qualified applicants appear across company and independent sources [24].

There was agreement that Nationwide does not offer a guaranteed-issue life insurance product [18]. This is the single most consequential shared finding for a buyer whose prior decline reflected a serious health condition.

Platforms further agreed that accelerated underwriting can still escalate. Nationwide's accelerated-underwriting guide states that some applicants will require additional underwriting when available information is insufficient [30], and its intelligent-underwriting materials indicate an abbreviated exam or other requirements may be necessary in some cases [31].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why do AI platforms disagree about whether Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam fits a previously declined applicant?
  • Is Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam available in New York for a buyer who was declined elsewhere?

Fit ratings diverged sharply. One platform rated the fit "good," four rated it "mixed," and two rated it "weak." The weak ratings came from platforms that concluded accelerated underwriting actively screens for healthy applicants and would likely detect the condition behind a prior decline [32].

Coverage limits conflict across sources. Nationwide's consumer article states up to $1.5 million for qualified Life Essentials applicants, while separate Nationwide accelerated-underwriting materials for other eligible products describe different face-amount limits [37]. One platform reported a $5 million tier for ages 18–50 in good health but flagged that this is a different tier than standard Life Essentials [40]. Those broader limits should not be assumed to apply to Life Essentials.

Age ranges conflict. Multiple sources state Life Essentials is limited to ages 21–55 [41], while one third-party 2026 review reports terms from 10 to 30 years, which conflicts with Nationwide's buyer-facing pages and remains uncertain [45].

New York availability is unresolved. One source states Nationwide Intelligent Underwriting is available in all states but New York [46], but the sources reviewed do not explicitly state whether Life Essentials itself is available in New York [46].

Waiting periods and graded death benefits are undocumented. No source reviewed specifies whether Life Essentials includes a waiting period or graded death benefit; one platform labeled this inferred rather than confirmed [48].

Pricing is not publicly standardized. One independent source cites premiums starting at approximately $15 per month [49], and one platform reported example averages around $45 per month for a 40-year-old female and $56 for a male on no-exam term [44]. No source specifies the age, health profile, or face amount behind the $15 figure, so it should not be treated as a quotable rate.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features make Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam usable for a buyer who was declined for life insurance?
  • Can Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam still require an exam or medical records after the online application?

The product's main use-case features are speed, coverage size relative to typical simplified-issue limits, and a data-driven underwriting path rather than a routine paramedical exam.

Nationwide promotes a fully digitalized automated underwriting process with an instant quote and detailed decision in minutes [50]. One independent review describes approval within 15 minutes if approved, with a fully online application [52]. Another platform reported 24–48 hour decisions rather than instant issue [54], so decision timing is not consistent across sources.

The underwriting path uses third-party data. One independent review describes algorithmic review of prescription history, driving records, and public data rather than a medical exam, with flagged data points moved to full underwriting rather than declined outright [55]. Nationwide's own materials describe AI-driven medical record processing in its underwriting [58].

Coverage size is a genuine differentiator for this use case. The stated $1.5 million ceiling is materially higher than many guaranteed-issue products, which typically cap far lower [59]. One platform noted that a $1.5 million ceiling is lower than competitors offering $4–5 million no-exam [61].

Conversion is reported but not fully verified. One independent review states term coverage can be converted to a permanent policy before the term expires without a new medical exam [62], while another platform stated conversion rights for Life Essentials are unclear across sources [63]. The exact Life Essentials conversion terms were not verified.

Health flags may push an applicant out of the fast path. One independent review lists active cancer treatment, recent cardiac events, diabetes requiring insulin, and history of drug or alcohol treatment as conditions that may disqualify an applicant from the no-exam pathway [64]. One platform cited a real-world account of an automated no-exam application declining an individual over minor medical history such as mild depression [66]; that is a single unverified user report, not a company disclosure.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam cost per month, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • Are Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam premiums level for the full 10- or 20-year term?

No reliable public rate table was located for Life Essentials. Pricing confidence is low across platforms, and a personalized quote is required [67].

Known cost signals are limited and inconsistent. One independent source cites premiums starting at approximately $15 per month [70]. One platform reported example averages around $45 per month for a 40-year-old female and $56 for a 40-year-old male for $500,000 of 20-year coverage [72]. Nationwide states that the final price may change after underwriting and that health history is among the factors considered [73].

On fees, no separate application fee or medical-exam fee was identified in the reviewed public materials, but buyers should confirm whether any policy, rider, administrative, or payment fees apply [67]. One platform noted optional riders are available at additional cost but did not provide rider pricing [70].

Contract terms are only partly documented. Platforms describe level premiums fixed for the selected 10- or 20-year term [70]. The policy contract controls if it conflicts with website terms, and approval is subject to Nationwide acceptance, underwriting guidelines, and personal history [76]. Grace period, lapse, reinstatement, renewal, and state-specific free-look provisions were not verified from the product pages and should be checked directly [68].

One platform reported that accelerated-underwriting policies typically price similarly to traditionally underwritten policies when applicants are healthy, because technology investment reduces insurer costs [77]. That is a general market observation, not a Life Essentials rate.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam best suited for after a life insurance decline?
  • Is Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam worth it for a declined applicant who wants fast term coverage up to $1.5 million?

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam is best suited for applicants who were declined for a reason that may not repeat under a different underwriting method, and who want term coverage quickly without a routine medical exam.

The clearest fit profiles across platform responses:

  • Applicants ages 21–55 seeking 10- or 20-year term coverage who may qualify through automated or accelerated underwriting [79].
  • Applicants who want a fast digital application and decision without a routine paramedical exam [79].
  • Applicants who need more coverage than typical guaranteed-issue policies provide and are willing to answer health and lifestyle questions [84].
  • Applicants declined for a carrier-specific rule, a clerical or application issue, or an incomplete medical history rather than a serious health condition [86].
  • Applicants who value a large carrier's financial strength; Nationwide holds an A+ AM Best rating and a low complaint index in independent reviews [88].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam for no-exam life insurance after being declined?
  • Is Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam a bad choice for a buyer who needs guaranteed acceptance?

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam is probably not the right choice for a buyer whose core requirement is guaranteed acceptance.

The clearest exclusion profiles across platform responses:

  • Applicants specifically seeking guaranteed acceptance after being declined. Nationwide states it does not offer guaranteed-issue life insurance [91].
  • Applicants whose prior decline involved a serious medical condition likely to remain unacceptable under accelerated underwriting, including active cancer treatment, recent cardiac events, insulin-dependent diabetes, or a history of drug or alcohol treatment [94].
  • Applicants over age 55 or under age 21, outside the publicly described Life Essentials age band [96].
  • Applicants needing coverage above $1.5 million through the no-exam path [99].
  • Applicants needing permanent coverage, coverage beyond the available term periods, or certainty that no additional underwriting evidence will be requested [101].
  • Applicants who cannot tolerate the risk of a second decline, since approval remains conditional [91].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam for a buyer who needs guaranteed approval?
  • When should a declined buyer skip Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam and compare other carriers instead?

Another option may be better in several specific situations that platforms identified.

If guaranteed acceptance is the primary requirement, compare guaranteed-issue whole life or final-expense products from carriers that actually offer them, recognizing typical lower limits, higher premiums, and possible graded or waiting periods [105]. One platform specifically named Mutual of Omaha and Washington National as guaranteed-issue alternatives, and another cited Mutual of Omaha guaranteed issue at ages 45–85 with a $25,000 cap and a two-year graded benefit [108].

If the buyer needs permanent coverage or a longer-term obligation, compare fully underwritten guaranteed universal life, simplified-issue permanent insurance, or other permanent products [110].

If the buyer needs more than $1.5 million without full medical underwriting, one platform suggested Nationwide's separate Intelligent Underwriting path may approve up to $5 million, or the buyer could consider Penn Mutual, Symetra SwiftTerm, or Banner Life at $4–5 million [112]. Those limits are not standard Life Essentials terms.

If the buyer needs a 30-year term, Life Essentials does not offer it; a competitor no-exam product or Nationwide's traditionally underwritten Guaranteed Level Term would be required [113].

If the buyer is in New York, verify Life Essentials availability and consider state-compliant alternatives, since one source states Intelligent Underwriting is unavailable there [114].

If the buyer prefers agent-guided application, note that Life Essentials is online-only, while other Nationwide products and competitor products offer agent interaction [111].

If the buyer is declined again, one platform noted Nationwide partners with third-party carrier Assurity for protection needs Life Essentials does not cover [115]. The scope of that referral path is unclear and should be confirmed directly.

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam before signing a contract after a prior decline?
  • Which underwriting details about Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam are not publicly disclosed?

The public sources reviewed do not provide a complete underwriting manual, a list of automatic declines, state-by-state availability, or a guaranteed schedule of when an exam or other evidence may be requested [116]. Buyers should confirm the following directly with Nationwide or a licensed broker:

  • Will Nationwide consider an application after the buyer's specific prior decline, and can an underwriter explain whether that decline reason is likely to cause another decline? [116]
  • Is Life Essentials currently available in the buyer's state, and which Nationwide legal entity issues the policy? [117]
  • What are the exact maximum face amount, issue-age limits, term choices, and underwriting classes for this applicant? [121]
  • Can Nationwide require an attending-physician statement, prescription check, interview, lab work, medical exam, or other evidence after the online application? [123]
  • What data sources are checked, and how can the applicant correct inaccurate information? [125]
  • Are premiums level for the selected term, and what are the grace-period, lapse, reinstatement, renewal, and conversion provisions? [127]
  • Are there exclusions, contestability provisions, suicide provisions, graded benefits, or waiting periods? [128]
  • Are riders available, what do they cost, and can they reduce the death benefit? [127]
  • What is the exact monthly or annual premium after the final underwriting decision, and are there policy or payment fees? [129]
  • If declined again, will the application or inquiry affect future underwriting with other carriers, and what disclosures should be made to another insurer? [116]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Mixed fit. Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam is worth considering as a fast, no-routine-exam term application after a prior decline, especially when the buyer wants meaningful coverage and may still qualify for accelerated underwriting. It is not a strong fallback for guaranteed acceptance: Nationwide expressly requires underwriting approval, does not offer guaranteed-issue coverage, and does not publicly disclose enough underwriting detail to predict whether a previously declined applicant will qualify [130].

Platform ratings split: one "good," four "mixed," two "weak." The weak ratings reflect a defensible concern that accelerated underwriting screens for healthy applicants and may detect the condition behind the original decline [133]. The mixed and good ratings reflect the product's real advantages: a $1.5 million no-exam ceiling, a fast digital process, and a large, highly rated carrier [136].

Agreement among AI platforms does not prove product quality. It shows which products platforms surfaced for this buyer question and how consistently they described the tradeoffs. For this use case, the tradeoff is clear: Life Essentials offers speed and coverage size, but it does not solve the core problem of a decline driven by serious health history.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from platform fit-research responses collected for the topic "Best No-Exam Life Insurance After Being Declined" with a research date of 2026-09-22. Seven platforms supplied responses: openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, perplexity, kimi, and google. Each platform was asked which legitimate life insurance carriers or coverage options it would recommend for a consumer previously declined for traditionally underwritten life insurance who now wants coverage that may not require a traditional medical exam.

Nationwide Life Essentials No-Exam was named by two of the seven platforms during the ranking stage (anthropic, grok), meeting the minimum mention threshold of two. Its listed ranks were 5 and 4, producing an average listed rank of 4.5 and a best listed rank of 4. Fit ratings by platform were: anthropic "good," openai "mixed," deepseek "mixed," grok "mixed," perplexity "mixed," kimi "weak," and google "weak."

All platform outputs were treated as platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the underlying evidence, so company claims are described as company claims rather than independently confirmed findings.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Deepseek reported a research date of 2026-01-15; all other platforms reported 2026-09-22. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
  • Deepseek ran with search disabled, so its claims are model-reported rather than retrieved from live sources.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations. Nationwide's own pages are the primary source for product structure, coverage limits, and underwriting statements.
  • Current individualized premiums and exact contract provisions were not publicly verifiable.
  • The public sources reviewed do not provide a complete underwriting manual, a list of automatic declines, state-by-state availability, or a guaranteed schedule of when an exam or other evidence may be requested.
  • Coverage limit, age range, term length, and New York availability conflicts remain unresolved across sources and are reported as conflicts rather than resolved by guessing.
  • One platform cited a single unverified user report of a decline over minor medical history; that is anecdotal and not a company disclosure.
  • Platform agreement on a product's presence in a recommendation list does not establish product quality, suitability, or approval likelihood for any individual applicant.
  • Official-site retrieval for the general Nationwide domain returned unrelated business-insurance content and was not used as a verified source for Life Essentials terms.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • No Medical Exam Life Insurance: Cost, Coverage Limits, and Best Companies: https://insuranceclarify.com/life-insurance/no-exam
  • 5 Best No-Exam Life Insurance Companies of 2026: https://money.com/best-no-exam-life-insurance/
  • Best no medical exam life insurance of September 2026: https://www.cnbc.com/select/best-no-medical-exam-life-insurance/
  • 7 Best Instant Life Insurance Companies of June 2026: https://www.ethos.com/life-insurance/best-instant-life-insurance-companies/
  • Best No-Exam Life Insurance Companies (2026: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/life/best/no-medical-exam/
  • Nationwide Life Insurance Review for 2026 | U.S. News: https://www.usnews.com/insurance/life-insurance/nationwide
  • Additional AI research evidence137 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:source7_finding2
    3. AI research evidence record grok:0
    4. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    9. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    12. AI research evidence record grok:1
    13. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:source11_finding1
    20. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    24. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    28. AI research evidence record grok:1
    29. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    30. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    32. AI research evidence record kimi:money-2026
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:insurancegeek-2026
    34. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    35. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    36. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:source2_finding2
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:source2_finding1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:source3_finding1
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    44. AI research evidence record grok:1
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:source10_finding1
    47. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:source8_note
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:source12_finding1
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    51. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:source5_finding1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:source5_finding2
    54. AI research evidence record kimi:insurancegeek-2026
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:source1_finding1
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:source1_finding2
    57. AI research evidence record grok:2
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    60. AI research evidence record kimi:insuranceclarify
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:source2_finding2
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:source9_finding1
    63. AI research evidence record grok:0
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:source6_finding1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:source6_finding2
    66. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    69. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:source12_finding1
    71. AI research evidence record kimi:money-2026
    72. AI research evidence record grok:1
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    74. AI research evidence record perplexity:c14
    75. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:source12_finding2
    78. AI research evidence record kimi:wsj-buyside
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    81. AI research evidence record grok:1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:source5_finding1
    83. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    85. AI research evidence record kimi:insuranceclarify
    86. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:source1_finding2
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:source13_finding1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:source13_finding2
    90. AI research evidence record kimi:money-2026
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:source11_finding1
    93. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:source6_finding1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:source6_finding2
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:source3_finding1
    97. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    98. AI research evidence record grok:1
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:source2_finding2
    100. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    103. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    104. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:insuranceclarify
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:ace-aaa
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:source6_finding1
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:insurancegeek-2026
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:source4_finding2
    112. AI research evidence record anthropic:source2_finding2
    113. AI research evidence record anthropic:source4_finding1
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:source10_finding1
    115. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    116. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    117. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    118. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    119. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    120. AI research evidence record anthropic:source10_finding1
    121. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    122. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    123. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    124. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    125. AI research evidence record anthropic:source1_finding1
    126. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    127. AI research evidence record anthropic:source12_finding1
    128. AI research evidence record anthropic:source8_note
    129. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    130. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    131. AI research evidence record anthropic:source11_finding1
    132. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    133. AI research evidence record kimi:money-2026
    134. AI research evidence record google:1.1.6
    135. AI research evidence record google:1.3.8
    136. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    137. AI research evidence record anthropic:source13_finding1

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
37
Ranking mentions
2 of 7
Platform share
29%
Final consensus rank
#9

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

15 independent · 22 company-owned

Evidence support

29 direct · 6 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

50b03d8240d960ddfd417d762c215ed6ddbebb42578ec6627f6e4235fef5fc08