Answer Capsule
Foresters Financial is a good fit for Simplified-Issue Final Expense Insurance, according to five of the seven AI platforms whose responses were included in this study. It was named during the ranking stage by five platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, kimi, openai), a 71.4% share of included platform responses, with an average listed rank of 5.0 and a best rank of 2. The strongest reason to consider it is PlanRight Whole Life: a permanent, simplified-issue product with health questions, no traditional medical exam, and $5,000–$35,000 of coverage. The main limitation is that simplified issue is not guaranteed issue, and public pricing transparency is low.
Research Snapshot
| Field | Finding |
|---|---|
| Platform mentions in ranking stage | 5 of 7 included platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, kimi, openai) |
| Share of included platform responses | 71.4% |
| Average listed rank | 5.0 |
| Best listed rank | 2 |
| Relevant product/model/plan | PlanRight Whole Life Insurance (also referenced as PlanRight Final Expense) |
| Overall use-case fit | Good (five platforms rated good; one rated strong) |
| Research date | 2026-09-21 |
Why Foresters Financial Qualified for This Study
Questions This Section Answers
- Why did Foresters Financial qualify for this simplified-issue final expense insurance study?
- How many AI platforms named Foresters Financial for simplified-issue final expense coverage?
Foresters Financial qualified because it was named during the ranking stage by five of the seven included platforms and because it offers a product that directly matches the study's use case: permanent final expense coverage underwritten with health questions rather than a traditional medical examination.
The ranking-stage platforms were anthropic, deepseek, google, kimi, and openai. Foresters Financial was not named by grok or perplexity during ranking discovery, though both later returned usable fit assessments. Its average listed rank was 5.0, with a best rank of 2 (openai) and a worst rank of 10 (kimi). Six platforms assessed fit: five rated it "good" and one (grok) rated it "strong."
The entity is a fraternal benefit society, not a conventional commercial insurer [1]. That structure matters for this use case because member benefits are non-contractual and may be changed or cancelled without notice (official:C1).
The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Simplified-Issue Final Expense Insurance
Questions This Section Answers
- Which Foresters Financial plan is most relevant for simplified-issue final expense insurance?
- Does Foresters Financial PlanRight require a medical exam for final expense coverage?
PlanRight Whole life insurance is the relevant product. Foresters states that PlanRight is simplified issue: insurability depends on medical and other application answers plus underwriting searches and review, and the process does not require bloodwork, saliva swabs, or a paramedical visit [2]. Independent broker material describes the same simplified-issue basis [3].
PlanRight is permanent whole life insurance with lifetime death-benefit protection stated to extend to age 121, guaranteed premiums, and guaranteed cash value [2]. Foresters specifically describes it as designed for final-expense planning, with a stated face-amount range of $5,000–$35,000 [2]. Coverage is available for ages 50 to 85 [5].
Underwriting runs through a point-of-sale process that provides a medical eligibility decision while the applicant is present, involving an MIB check, prescription history check, build chart review, and a personal health interview [6]. Most certificates are issued in under two business days [8].
Plan tiers differ. Preferred and Standard plans pay 100% of the face amount from day one, while the Basic/Graded plan pays a reduced benefit in the first two years — reported as 30% in year one, 70% in year two, and 100% thereafter [9]. One source describes the graded structure as return-of-premium plus 10% interest instead, so the exact graded calculation is a documented conflict [9].
What the AI Platforms Agreed About
Questions This Section Answers
- What did the AI platforms agree on about Foresters Financial PlanRight for final expense insurance?
- Is Foresters Financial PlanRight permanent coverage with guaranteed level premiums?
The platforms agreed on the product's core mechanics: simplified issue with health questions, no traditional medical exam, permanent whole life coverage, and a face-amount range suited to final expenses rather than broad income replacement.
OpenAI, anthropic, grok, and perplexity all cited Foresters' own PlanRight page for the simplified-issue structure and the $5,000–$35,000 range [11]. Multiple platforms described guaranteed level premiums and lifetime coverage to age 121 [11].
Platforms also agreed that the product is not guaranteed issue. Approval depends on health answers and underwriting review, and a decline or a different benefit class is possible [11]. Kimi noted that most simplified-issue policies provide full death benefit from day one when health answers qualify, but some assign modified or graded benefits [18].
Several platforms flagged the same service-model constraints: no online quoting or application, agent-only sales, and mail-in-only claims [19].
Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain
Questions This Section Answers
- What is uncertain about Foresters Financial PlanRight pricing and state availability?
- Do the AI platforms disagree about Foresters Financial's complaint history and claims processing?
Pricing is the largest gap. No platform found a public rate table. OpenAI, anthropic, perplexity, and deepseek all reported low pricing confidence and said a personalized quote is required [22]. Grok reported moderate confidence and cited sample 2026 quotes of roughly $26–$32 per month for $10,000 of coverage, a minimum premium of $10 monthly, and certificate fees by payment mode [26]. Those figures come from a third-party comparison and were not confirmed on the official consumer page.
State availability conflicts. One source states Foresters offers coverage in all states except New York [28], while another states PlanRight specifically is not available in Oregon, South Carolina, or Virginia [29]. The official page notes that PlanRight and its riders may not be available or approved in all states [22].
Complaint data conflicts. One review reports an NAIC complaint index of 1.94, indicating above-average complaints relative to competitors [30], and another reports high complaint rates relative to company size in 2025 [31]. A separate source cited zero complaints under a different legal entity name, which may reflect a different entity or a data lag [31].
Claims processing is uncertain. One complaint reported roughly 30 days total — 15 days for review and 15 days to issue payment [32]. No official average claims timeline was published in the reviewed sources.
Face-amount minimums also conflict. The official page states $5,000–$35,000, while older or third-party producer materials show different minimums or age-based limits [22].
Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities
Questions This Section Answers
- What riders and cash value features does Foresters Financial PlanRight include for final expense buyers?
- Does Foresters Financial PlanRight build cash value that a buyer can borrow against?
PlanRight's use-case features center on permanent coverage, simplified underwriting, and a small set of included riders.
The official product page lists a common-carrier accidental-death rider, a family-health-benefit rider for limited qualifying disaster-related expenses, and a terminal-illness accelerated-death-benefit rider as features that may be included without additional premium, subject to eligibility and policy terms [34]. One independent review states the policy includes accelerated death benefit, common carrier accidental death, and family health benefit riders at no extra cost [35]. The phrase "may be included at no additional premium" does not establish that every rider is available to every applicant or in every state [34].
The policy builds guaranteed cash value and may permit policy loans [34]. Loans reduce death benefits and cash values, accrue interest, may affect how long coverage remains in force, and can cause termination if the loan exceeds cash value [34].
Foresters operates as a fraternal benefit society, and policyholders may be eligible for member benefits and community programs in addition to the insurance coverage [37]. Independent material lists scholarships, financial counseling, discounted legal services, and volunteering [38]. One source states full member benefits require a $10,000+ face amount, but not all sources confirm that threshold [38].
Underwriting limits are concrete: insurance will be declined if the applicant falls outside the minimum or maximum weight for their height under the PlanRight build chart [39]. There is no temporary insurance coverage on PlanRight while the application processes [40].
Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs
Questions This Section Answers
- How much does Foresters Financial PlanRight cost per month for final expense coverage?
- What fees, loan interest, and cancellation terms apply to Foresters Financial PlanRight?
Exact premiums are not publicly stated on the official consumer product page reviewed. Premiums should vary by age, sex, tobacco status, health answers, benefit class, face amount, payment mode, state, and underwriting outcome [41].
Grok reported the most specific cost data: sample 2026 quotes for $10,000 of face amount of roughly $26–$32 per month depending on age, gender, and smoking status; a minimum premium of $10 monthly; and certificate fees of $3.15 monthly and $9.36 quarterly [43]. These are platform-reported figures from a third-party comparison and were not verified against Foresters' own published rates.
Anthropic reported an annual certificate fee with no publicly specified amount, and noted that member benefits are generally included at no additional premium for policies with $10,000+ face amount [42]. OpenAI found no separate application fee or rider charge verified from the official consumer page [41].
Contract terms: premiums are payable to age 121 [42]. The policy is a guaranteed level premium product that the company cannot cancel [46]. An automatic premium loan provision is available [42]. Preferred and Standard plans have no grading period, while Basic/Graded plans limit the death benefit in the first two years [47]. The official page indicates guaranteed premiums but does not provide complete state-specific lapse, surrender, nonforfeiture, grace-period, or cancellation terms; the applicable state certificate controls [41].
Best Suited For
Questions This Section Answers
- Who is Foresters Financial PlanRight best suited for in simplified-issue final expense insurance?
- Is Foresters Financial a good choice for applicants with manageable health conditions?
Foresters Financial PlanRight is best suited to applicants ages 50–85 seeking permanent final expense coverage who are willing to provide health information in exchange for potentially better pricing or benefits than guaranteed-issue insurance [48].
It also fits applicants who need approximately $5,000–$35,000 of coverage and want to avoid bloodwork, saliva swabs, or a paramedical visit [48]. One independent review describes liberal underwriting for seniors with health issues, making it a solid choice for applicants with manageable conditions [50]. Anthropic specifically listed diabetics, smokers, and those with mild COPD among applicants potentially acceptable under simplified underwriting [50].
Buyers who value fraternal membership benefits — scholarships, financial counseling, legal services, and volunteering — may find additional non-insurance value [51]. Buyers who prioritize fixed, guaranteed level premiums for predictable lifetime costs are also a fit [53].
Probably Not Best Suited For
Questions This Section Answers
- Who should not choose Foresters Financial PlanRight for final expense insurance?
- Is Foresters Financial PlanRight a bad fit for buyers who need guaranteed acceptance?
Buyers who cannot qualify through simplified underwriting or do not want to answer health questions should not choose PlanRight, because it is not a guaranteed-acceptance product [54].
Buyers needing coverage above the stated PlanRight face-amount range, or who fall outside ages 50–85, are also poor fits [54]. Applicants who cannot meet the build chart height-weight requirements will be declined [57].
Buyers who prioritize an immediately visible, individualized premium quote without an agent or application are not well served: Foresters does not offer online quotes, and the only way to get one is to contact the company directly [58]. PlanRight policies are sold through independent agents only [59].
Buyers who need rapid claims processing should weigh the reported delays and mail-in-only claims process [60]. Buyers in New York, and possibly Oregon, South Carolina, or Virginia, should verify availability before applying [62].
When Another Option May Be Better
Questions This Section Answers
- When is a guaranteed-issue final expense policy better than Foresters Financial PlanRight?
- When should a buyer choose a different simplified-issue carrier instead of Foresters Financial?
A guaranteed-issue final-expense carrier may be better when the applicant is unlikely to pass simplified underwriting or will not answer health questions [64]. Applicants with recent or active serious conditions — cancer treatment, oxygen use, kidney failure, or a terminal diagnosis — may find guaranteed-issue products with graded benefits are the only option [65].
A different simplified-issue carrier may be better when it offers a lower verified premium, broader state availability, higher face amounts, or more favorable underwriting for the applicant's specific conditions [64]. Kimi named Mutual of Omaha, Aetna/Accendo, and Aflac as comparison points for price-sensitive buyers who qualify for preferred tiers elsewhere [65].
Traditional fully underwritten whole life or term insurance may be better when the buyer is relatively healthy and needs more coverage at potentially lower cost [64]. A broker comparison is preferable when the buyer wants side-by-side quotes from multiple final-expense insurers [64]. One review places PlanRight as competitive with Colonial Penn, Guarantee Trust Life, Trustage, and Mutual of Omaha [66].
Questions to Verify Before Buying
Questions This Section Answers
-
What should a buyer confirm with Foresters Financial before signing a PlanRight contract?
-
Which PlanRight tier and premium will a buyer actually receive?
-
What is the exact monthly or annual premium for the applicant's age, state, tobacco status, health answers, face amount, and benefit class? [67]
-
Is the proposed policy level-benefit, graded, or modified-benefit, and what exclusions or waiting-period provisions apply? [67]
-
Which medical conditions, medications, recent hospitalizations, tobacco use, or activities affect eligibility or classification? [67]
-
Is PlanRight currently approved and available in the applicant's state, and what is the exact maximum face amount there? [67]
-
What are the grace-period, lapse, reinstatement, surrender, nonforfeiture, and free-look provisions? [67]
-
Which riders are actually included, what eligibility rules and limits apply, and can they be changed or terminated? [67]
-
What are the guaranteed cash values and surrender values at years 1, 5, 10, and later? [67]
-
What loan interest rate applies, how is it calculated, and how could borrowing affect lapse risk and the death benefit? [67]
-
Does the applicant's height and weight fall within Foresters' build chart requirements, or will the application be declined? [70]
-
What is the documented average time from claim submission to benefit payment, and what are the steps involved? [71]
-
Will the applicant qualify for all member benefits at the chosen face amount? [72]
-
Can the buyer review the complete state-specific certificate and illustration before submitting payment? [67]
Final AI Consensus Verdict
Foresters Financial is a good fit for a consumer seeking modest permanent final-expense coverage who is willing to answer health questions and wants to avoid a medical exam [73]. Five of the six platforms that assessed fit rated it good; one rated it strong. The product is not a guaranteed-acceptance solution, and low public pricing transparency means the buyer should obtain and compare a state-specific quote, underwriting result, certificate, and cash-value illustration before purchasing [73].
The decision quality depends on four verifications: actual premium quotes, state availability and build chart eligibility, tolerance for above-average complaint history and reported claims processing delays, and comfort with agent-only sales and mail-in-only claims [74].
How This Review Was Produced
This review evaluates Foresters Financial only for simplified-issue final expense insurance. It is not a broad company review. The study used a fixed prompt asking which life insurance carriers would be recommended for a consumer seeking permanent final expense insurance through simplified underwriting with health questions but no traditional medical examination. Seven platforms were configured; six returned a usable fit assessment. Ranking statistics count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery. All findings are platform-reported and were not independently verified by the writer stage. The consensus index for this category is available at Simplified-Issue Final Expense Insurance, and the broader directory is at life insurance.
Methodology Limitations
Six of seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment, so the fit findings should not be described as unanimous. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-21: deepseek reported 2026-01-15, while anthropic, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-22. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. Deepseek ran with search disabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing; conflicts are described and buyers are directed to verify. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed.
Sources
Company-Owned Sources
- Foresters PlanRight Whole Life Insurance Producer Guide: https://ezbiz.foresters.com/foresters-planright-product-guide
- PlanRight Whole Life - ezbiz - Foresters Financial: https://ezbiz.foresters.com/foresters-planright-recruitment
- Foresters Financial Official Website: https://www.foresters.com/en/
- Foresters PlanRight Whole Life Information: https://www.foresters.com/en/insurance/planright
- Whole life insurance: https://www.foresters.com/en/life-insurance/whole-life-insurance
- PlanRight | Foresters Financial | US: https://www.foresters.com/en/life-insurance/whole-life-insurance/planright
Additional AI research evidence77 records
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:15-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
- AI research evidence record grok:web:4
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record anthropic:30-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:35-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:39-7
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-6
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:4
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:39-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:30-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:13-2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
Independent Sources
- Guaranteed Issue vs Simplified Issue Life Insurance (2026 Guide: https://asurgo.com/life-insurance/guaranteed-issue-vs-simplified-issue/
- Guaranteed Issue vs. Simplified Issue Final Expense Insurance – Senior Plans Insurance Blog: https://blog.senior-plans.ca/guaranteed-issue-vs-simplified-issue-final-expense-insurance/
- Foresters - DigitalBGA: https://digitalbga.com/foresters/
- Foresters Life Insurance Review: Rates, Ratings, and More: https://finalexpensebenefits.org/foresters-insurance-guide/
- Foresters Life Insurance Review 2026 | Rates & Ratings: https://ogletreefinancial.com/blog/foresters-life-insurance-company-review/
- Foresters PlanRight Agent Guide: https://rosenthalfinancialservices.com/_downloadz/PlanRight_Product_Guide.pdf
- Simplified Issue vs. Guaranteed Issue: Which Final Expense Policy Is Right for You? – Smarter Senior Living: https://smarterseniorliving.com/2026/05/14/simplified-issue-vs-guaranteed-issue-which-final-expense-policy-is-right-for-you/
- Foresters - Simplified Issue Final Expense: https://victorson.com/general-insurance-brokerage-products/life-insurance/simplified-issue-final-expense/foresters/
- Foresters Financial | BBB Business Profile | Better Business Bureau: https://www.bbb.org/ca/on/north-york/profile/insurance-companies/foresters-financial-0107-1166355
- Foresters Financial Final Expense Insurance Review & Complaints: Life & Retirement Insurance (2026: https://www.expertinsurancereviews.com/foresters-final-expense/
- Final Expense Insurance Carrier Comparison: https://www.investopedia.com/best-final-expense-insurance-5186856
- Final Expense Insurance Cost (2026 Rates) | MoneyGeek: https://www.moneygeek.com/insurance/life/final-expense-insurance-cost/
- Foresters Life Insurance Review 2026: https://www.nerdwallet.com/insurance/life/foresters-life-insurance-review
- Foresters Final Expense Insurance | Product Details & Agent Resources | New Horizons: https://www.newhorizonsmktg.com/final-expense/foresters
- Foresters Life Insurance Review (2026): Is It the Best Final Expense Option for Seniors?: https://www.pinnaclequote.com/blog/foresters-life-insurance-company/
- Foresters Life Insurance Review - Fraternal Values, Flexible Coverage: https://www.riskquoter.com/company-reviews/foresters/
- Foresters Financial Reviews 2026 | Pros & Cons | InsuredBetter: https://www.trustedchoice.com/insurance-articles/c/foresters-financial-insurance-company-review/
- Foresters Financial Life Insurance Review: https://www.usnews.com/insurance/life-insurance/foresters-life
Additional AI research evidence77 records
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:15-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
- AI research evidence record grok:web:4
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record anthropic:30-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:35-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:39-7
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-6
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:4
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:39-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:30-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:13-2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
Other Sources
- Final Expense Sample Policy: https://choicemutual.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Foresters-Financial-Sample-Policy.pdf
- Foresters Final Expense Product Review For Agents Only: https://davidduford.com/foresters-final-expense-review/
Additional AI research evidence77 records
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:7-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:15-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record grok:web:1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
- AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
- AI research evidence record grok:web:4
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record anthropic:30-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:35-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:39-7
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-3
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-6
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
- AI research evidence record grok:web:4
- AI research evidence record grok:web:0
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:39-10
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:11-1
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:12-5
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-12
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:30-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record kimi:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:13-2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:46-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:41-9
- AI research evidence record anthropic:14-11
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:24-2
- AI research evidence record openai:c1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:29-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
- AI research evidence record anthropic:37-3
- AI research evidence record anthropic:21-18
Verify this research
Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.
- Study date
- September 21, 2026
- Platforms analyzed
- 7
- Source records
- 27
- Ranking mentions
- 5 of 7
- Platform share
- 71%
- Final consensus rank
- #3
Behind the findings
Platforms in this study
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- DeepSeek
- Grok
- Perplexity
- Kimi
- Gemini
Source records
18 independent · 7 company-owned · 2 unclear
Evidence support
16 direct · 11 partial
Keep in mind
Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
Technical verification details
Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.
92074e649fe332cd496454a8b5c2c5cfa8135e554eaa453ffc863ee74c16a2db