Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense Level-Benefit Final Expense Insurance Fit Review

Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense is a good fit, with verification requirements, for a buyer seeking Level-Benefit Final Expense Insurance who will complete simplified underwriting.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense is a good fit, with verification requirements, for a buyer seeking Level-Benefit Final Expense Insurance who will complete simplified underwriting. Three of seven platforms named the entity during the ranking stage (google, grok, kimi), a 42.9% share, at an average listed rank of 4.33 and a best rank of 3. The strongest reason to consider it is the Ensured Legacy Simplified Issue Whole Life form, which independent sources describe as paying the full stated death benefit from day one for qualified applicants, backed by an AM Best A (Excellent) rating. The main limitation is that official consumer materials reviewed do not plainly state the day-one level-benefit rule, and no applicant-specific premium is published.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (google, grok, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank4.33
Best listed rank3
Relevant product/model/planEnsured Legacy Final Expense — Simplified Issue Whole Life / Level Benefit, Form Series 211311
Overall use-case fitGood, with material verification requirements
Research date2026-09-22

Why Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense a good choice for level-benefit final expense insurance with simplified underwriting?
  • Why did Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense qualify for this level-benefit final expense study when only three platforms named it?

Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense qualified because it cleared the study's minimum-mention threshold and because the underlying product maps directly onto the buyer's stated need. The ranking stage required at least two platform mentions; this entity received three, from google, grok, and kimi, giving it a 42.9% share of the seven included platform responses [1].

The entity is a ranking-stage label. The official materials use Royal Neighbors of America and Ensured Legacy Final Expense rather than the exact phrase "Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense," and one platform's official-site retrieval failed, so the plan name should be treated as unverified until confirmed [3]. The relevant product for this use case is the Simplified Issue Whole Life form, Form Series 211311, which sits alongside a Graded Death Benefit form and a Guaranteed Issue form in the same product family [5].

Qualification does not mean the product is best. It means the entity surfaced often enough in platform recommendations to be evaluated against the buyer's criteria: willingness to undergo simplified underwriting, a reputable carrier, reasonable premiums, and clear policy guarantees.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Level-Benefit Final Expense Insurance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Royal Neighbors plan should a buyer choose if they need a level death benefit from day one rather than a graded payout?
  • Does Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense use simplified underwriting with no medical exam?

The relevant plan is Ensured Legacy Final Expense — Simplified Issue Whole Life (SIWL), Form Series 211311. Royal Neighbors identifies Ensured Legacy as a suite containing Simplified Issue Whole Life (Form Series 211311), Graded Death Benefit (Form Series 211312), and Guaranteed Issue (Form Series 221309); the Simplified Issue Whole Life form is the level-benefit version relevant to this buyer [8].

Coverage is stated at $5,000 to $40,000, with the available amount depending on which underwriting path the applicant qualifies for [8]. Independent field-guide material describes the SIWL death benefit as level and payable at the full face amount from inception, with issue ages of 50–85 for SIWL and 50–80 for the graded form [11]. One independent review states that qualified simplified-issue applicants receive the full death benefit from day one [12].

Underwriting is simplified: yes/no health questions, no medical exam, with eligibility determined by phone, electronic application, or paper submission, conducted through an underwriting partner [11]. The product is permanent whole life coverage, not term, and Royal Neighbors states it is not a funeral or burial contract — death proceeds are paid to designated beneficiaries [8].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense for level-benefit final expense insurance?
  • Is Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense described as permanent coverage with level premiums?

Agreement was strong but not unanimous across the seven included platforms. Six of seven rated the fit as good (openai, anthropic, google, grok, perplexity) or mixed (deepseek), while one rated it uncertain (kimi) [14].

Platforms broadly agreed on four points. First, the product family includes a genuine level-benefit simplified-issue form distinct from graded and guaranteed-issue versions [14]. Second, underwriting is simplified with health questions rather than a full medical exam, matching the buyer's stated willingness [22]. Third, coverage is permanent whole life with level premiums that do not increase [24]. Fourth, the carrier holds an AM Best A (Excellent) financial-strength rating, with one platform citing affirmation on December 12, 2025 and another citing December 2024 [27].

Platforms also agreed on the core limitation: pricing is not publicly transparent, and buyers cannot independently verify premium competitiveness without contacting the company or an agent [14].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is unverified or disputed about Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense's day-one benefit and maximum coverage?
  • Why do AI platforms disagree about whether Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense is a strong or uncertain fit?

The most consequential disagreement concerns the day-one level-benefit rule. An independent review states qualified simplified-issue applicants receive the full death benefit from day one, while the official brochure reviewed confirms separate simplified-issue and graded forms without expressly stating that rule [31]. One platform could not confirm whether the level benefit applies to all covered natural deaths from issue or is subject to certification, contestability, or another limitation [33].

Maximum face amount is reported inconsistently. Royal Neighbors' official site cites $5,000–$40,000 for the final expense line; an agent guide shows $7,000–$30,000 for SIWL; other public materials cite $25,000 or $30,000 caps for simplified issue, and one source cites $40,000 or $50,000 depending on state [34]. It is unclear whether $40,000 applies in all states or only under specific underwriting circumstances.

Other unresolved items: the prior research record reported an A (Excellent) AM Best rating dated December 11, 2025, but the rating source was not independently accessible during one platform's review [38]. Graded Death Benefit availability was noted in one agent document as limited to Connecticut, Florida, and North Dakota, though broader availability may exist [35]. One platform's official-site retrieval failed entirely, so it could not verify the product name or features and rated the fit uncertain [39]. Platform-reported research dates also differ: two platforms report 2026-01-15 and five report 2026-09-23, while the authoritative run date for this study is 2026-09-22.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What riders and features does Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense include for a level-benefit final expense buyer?
  • Does Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense build cash value and include an accelerated death benefit?

The product's use-case-relevant features center on permanent coverage, level premiums, and optional riders. Available features include a Charitable Giving Rider with no additional premium, a Grandchild Rider requiring additional premium, an Accidental Death Benefit Rider requiring additional premium, and an Accelerated Death Benefit Rider with no additional premium subject to conditions [40]. The accelerated-benefit rider is unavailable on guaranteed-issue certificates and requires at least $7,000 of face amount [40].

One independent product guide states the Accelerated Living Benefit rider applies to terminal conditions or permanent nursing home confinement on policies over $7,000, and that policy loan interest is 8% in arrears, 6% in Montana [43]. The policy is described as building cash value and remaining in force until death provided premiums are paid, with a standard 31-day grace period and an optional automatic premium loan from accumulated cash value [44].

One independent review highlights a niche underwriting advantage: applicants with diabetic neuropathy can still qualify for the preferred rate class under the day-one level benefit plan, a condition that is a common decline or rating trigger with other insurers [45]. This is a single-source claim and should be verified with the carrier.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense cost per month, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • Is the premium for Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense guaranteed never to increase?

No official applicant-specific premium or public rate schedule was located, and pricing confidence is low across platforms [46]. Premiums vary by age, sex, health, tobacco status, state, coverage amount, and underwriting classification [46].

Illustrative figures from independent sources, which are not quotes and may not apply to a particular buyer or state: one broker review lists $37.15 at age 50, $48.55 at age 65, and $125.35 at age 80 for $10,000 of coverage in one female simplified-issue example [50]. Other 2026 reviews cite roughly $47 per month for a 65-year-old woman and about $63 per month for a 65-year-old man for $10,000 of coverage, and $74 per month for $15,000 at age 50 for a smoker [51]. One review describes pricing as mid-pack, with rates for applicants under 60 notably higher than competitors [52].

On fees and contract terms: no separate policy fee or application fee was identified in the reviewed public materials, though it is unclear whether state-specific or billing-related charges apply [46]. One platform reports a $50 annual certificate fee and a 30-day free-look period, while another reports a 20-day free-look period or longer if required by state law [54]. Premiums are described by independent sources as level and payable for life or until age 121 [50]. The official materials state that contractual provisions and limitations vary by state, and that contracts are not FDIC-insured, are not deposit accounts, and may lose value [46]. Complete free-look, grace-period, lapse, surrender, reinstatement, and nonforfeiture terms for a specific state were not disclosed in the reviewed materials [46].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense best suited for among level-benefit final expense buyers?
  • Is Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense a good fit for applicants aged 50 to 85 in good-to-moderate health?

This product is best suited for applicants willing to answer health questions and undergo simplified underwriting, who want permanent final expense coverage generally within the stated $5,000–$40,000 range [57]. It fits buyers who value level premiums, optional riders, and a carrier with publicly reported financial-strength information [57].

It also fits applicants who want full benefits from inception and can qualify for the Simplified Issue Whole Life form rather than the graded or guaranteed-issue forms [57]. Issue ages of 50–85 for SIWL align with the typical final expense market [60]. Buyers who value fraternal benefit society membership — including community programs, scholarships, and charitable giving riders — may find the structure appealing [61]. One platform notes the product stands out for seniors over 60, particularly those with specific pre-existing conditions like diabetic neuropathy [63].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense for level-benefit final expense insurance?
  • Is Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense a poor fit for buyers who need guaranteed acceptance or coverage above $40,000?

This product is probably not best suited for applicants who need guaranteed acceptance regardless of health history, since the level-benefit version requires simplified underwriting and qualification is not guaranteed [64]. Buyers needing coverage above typical final-expense amounts, or above the stated $40,000 ceiling, should look elsewhere [64].

It is also a poor fit for buyers who require publicly available, state-specific online premiums before contacting an agent, because no official rate table is published [64]. Applicants in states where the product or relevant rider is unavailable — Royal Neighbors states it is licensed in all states and D.C. except Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New York — cannot buy it [64]. Buyers unwilling to distinguish the level-benefit form from the graded-benefit and guaranteed-issue alternatives should also proceed cautiously, since the product family is easy to confuse [68]. One platform notes the fraternal benefit society structure limits access to state guaranty fund protection compared to standard insurers, a material structural consideration for some buyers [69].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense for a buyer who needs guaranteed issue or verified lowest pricing?
  • When should a buyer choose a different carrier over Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense for level-benefit final expense insurance?

Another option may be better in several defined situations. A guaranteed-issue product is preferable when the applicant cannot qualify for simplified underwriting or needs acceptance without health questions [70]. Another carrier is preferable when the buyer needs a clearly published day-one benefit schedule, transparent online premiums, or broader state availability [70].

A higher-coverage permanent policy or traditional whole-life policy may be preferable when the buyer needs materially more than $40,000 [70]. A policy with more explicit contract disclosures may be preferable when the buyer prioritizes publicly available surrender values, lapse provisions, and state-specific illustrations before applying [70].

One platform specifically names Mutual of Omaha Living Promise Level Benefit as a comparison point, citing published sample rates, an A+ (Superior) AM Best rating, documented underwriting niches such as insulin-dependent diabetes diagnosed at age 50+, and an accelerated death benefit rider included at no cost [72]. That platform rated Royal Neighbors uncertain precisely because competitor details were more transparent in its retrieved sources [74]. Buyers in excluded states, or those who want a traditional stock or mutual insurer structure rather than a fraternal society, should also compare alternatives [75].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense before signing a contract?
  • Which form series and state-specific terms should a buyer verify before purchasing Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense?

Before purchasing, confirm the following with Royal Neighbors or a licensed agent:

  • Will the issued certificate be Form Series 211311 Simplified Issue Whole Life, rather than Form Series 211312 Graded Death Benefit or Form Series 221309 Guaranteed Issue? [76]
  • Does the applicable state-specific certificate pay 100% of the stated death benefit for covered natural death immediately from issue, with no graded period? [76]
  • What health questions, prescription-history checks, issue ages, tobacco rules, and decline criteria apply in the buyer's state? [76]
  • What is the exact premium for the desired face amount, payment mode, risk class, state, and tobacco status, and is it guaranteed for the life of the certificate? [76]
  • What are the policy's cash-value, surrender, lapse, grace-period, reinstatement, and nonforfeiture provisions? [76]
  • Which riders are available in the buyer's state, what do they cost, and what exclusions or termination ages apply? [76]
  • Are there any billing, policy, membership, or state-specific fees not shown in the public brochure? [76]
  • What is the current AM Best rating and the date and scope of the rating? [76]
  • Is the policy available for the buyer's residence and desired face amount, and are there any state-specific form changes? [76]
  • What is the free-look period, and what happens if the buyer cancels during or after it? [78]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The consensus verdict is a good fit with material verification requirements. Six of seven platforms rated the fit good or mixed, and one rated it uncertain; no platform rated it poor [82].

The strongest support is the existence of a genuine simplified-issue level-benefit form within the Ensured Legacy suite, permanent coverage with level premiums, a stated $5,000–$40,000 range, optional riders, and a carrier with a reported AM Best A (Excellent) rating [82]. The strongest caution is that the official consumer materials reviewed do not plainly confirm the day-one level-benefit rule, do not publish applicant-specific pricing, and leave important state-specific contract terms unclear [82].

Platform agreement does not prove product quality. It reflects that multiple AI systems independently surfaced the same product for this use case and reached broadly similar conclusions from overlapping public evidence. Buyers should treat the level-benefit guarantee, premium, and state-specific terms as items to confirm in the issued certificate before purchasing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a structured fit-research study covering seven AI platforms: openai, anthropic, google, grok, perplexity, deepseek, and kimi. Each platform evaluated whether Royal Neighbors Level Benefit Final Expense fits a buyer seeking level-benefit final expense insurance with simplified underwriting, a reputable carrier, reasonable premiums, and clear policy guarantees. The study used a minimum-mention threshold of two platforms during the ranking stage; three platforms named the entity, at an average listed rank of 4.33 and a best rank of 3. The authoritative research date for this study is 2026-09-22. Platform-reported research dates differ: anthropic and deepseek report 2026-01-15, while google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity report 2026-09-23. All platform outputs are labeled platform-reported and were not independently verified by the writer stage. This review is part of the broader Level-Benefit Final Expense Insurance consensus index, which compares carriers across the same buyer criteria.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date, and those dates are provenance metadata rather than independent proof of freshness. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts, and no-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

One platform's official-site retrieval failed, so its product-name and feature findings remain unverified [91]. The deterministic identity audit notes that official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions, that identity used exact-name fallback, and that company-name variants were collapsed onto one canonical brand before minimum-mentions qualification. The product name supplied for evaluation is a ranking-stage label; official materials use Royal Neighbors of America and Ensured Legacy Final Expense.

Material conflicts remain unresolved: maximum SIWL face amount, day-one level-benefit wording, graded-benefit state availability, free-look period length, and certificate fee reporting. Missing research was not treated as disagreement. Platform agreement on fit does not establish product quality, and no personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed. Buyers should confirm all terms in the issued certificate and compare at least two to three competing carriers before purchasing. For broader context on carrier structures and product types, see the life insurance category directory.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Royal Neighbors of America - Final Expense Insurance: https://royalneighbors.org/
  • Insurance with a Difference - Royal Neighbors of America: https://www.royalneighbors.org/
  • Ensured Legacy Final Expense - Royal Neighbors of America: https://www.royalneighbors.org/insurance/ensured-legacy-final-expense/
  • Additional AI research evidence91 records
    1. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    2. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    3. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    4. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    13. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    17. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    19. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    25. AI research evidence record grok:web:6
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    30. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    37. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    42. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    43. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    44. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    45. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    49. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    51. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    52. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    54. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    61. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    62. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    63. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    66. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    67. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    73. AI research evidence record kimi:c7
    74. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    84. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    85. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    87. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    91. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Simplified Issue Whole Life (SIWL) & Graded Death Benefit (GDB: https://thgins.com/wp-content/uploads/resources/RoyalNeighbors/Final-Expense-Product-Profile.pdf
  • Annual Report - Royal Neighbors of America: https://www.royalneighbors.org/about-us/annual-report/
  • Royal Neighbors Launches New Final Expense Product Catering to the Uninsured: https://www.royalneighbors.org/must-reads/newsroom/2024/01/22/RNA-New-Final-Expense-Product
  • Additional AI research evidence91 records
    1. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    2. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    3. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    4. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    13. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    17. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    19. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    21. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    25. AI research evidence record grok:web:6
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    30. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    36. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    37. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    39. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    42. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    43. AI research evidence record google:1.2.4
    44. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    45. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    49. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    51. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    52. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    54. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    61. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    62. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    63. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    66. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    67. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    73. AI research evidence record kimi:c7
    74. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    80. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    84. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    85. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    86. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    87. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    91. AI research evidence record kimi:c1

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
31
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#6

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

22 independent · 5 company-owned · 4 unclear

Evidence support

21 direct · 8 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

2d76ae832b47dd60cd6bf4d6c3c5f035bd74e136709bffb45cc331b8cdb1db71