Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Aetna Final Expense Insurance With No Waiting Period Fit Review

Aetna, through its Accendo Insurance Company affiliate, is a good fit for a buyer who wants permanent final expense coverage with full natural-death benefits from day one and is willing to answer health questions.

Research: 2026-09-217 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Aetna, through its Accendo Insurance Company affiliate, is a good fit for a buyer who wants permanent final expense coverage with full natural-death benefits from day one and is willing to answer health questions. Three of seven platforms named Aetna during the ranking stage (deepseek, google, kimi), and all seven platforms that evaluated fit rated it good or strong. The strongest reason to consider it is that the Accendo Preferred and Standard Level plans are reported to pay the full death benefit from policy issue with no waiting period. The main limitation is that this outcome is conditional: applicants who do not qualify for a level tier may be offered the Modified plan, which carries a two-year graded benefit for natural death.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (deepseek, google, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank2.33
Best listed rank2
Relevant product/model/planAccendo Final Expense Individual Whole Life Insurance: Preferred and Standard Level Plans
Overall use-case fitGood to strong; conditional on approval for a level tier
Research date2026-09-21

Why Aetna Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Aetna qualify for a no-waiting-period final expense ranking when only three platforms named it?
  • Is Aetna a good choice for Final Expense Insurance With No Waiting Period?

Aetna qualified because it offers a product that directly matches the study's core requirement: permanent final expense coverage with full natural-death benefits from the beginning of the policy. The Accendo Preferred and Standard Level plans are described as paying the full face value from the policy issue date for death from natural or accidental causes [1].

Three of the seven included platforms named Aetna during ranking discovery: deepseek (rank 3), google (rank 2), and kimi (rank 2). That produces an average listed rank of 2.33 and a best listed rank of 2. The remaining four platforms evaluated Aetna's fit for this use case but did not place it in their ranking-stage lists.

Aetna's qualification rests on the level-plan structure rather than on brand size. The relevant product is individual whole life insurance, not term coverage, and the level tiers are reported to avoid the graded-benefit structure that disqualifies many final expense products from this use case [2].

The entity relationship matters here. The policy issuer is Accendo Insurance Company, described in independent reviews as a subsidiary of CVS Health following its 2018 acquisition of Aetna [6]. Aetna branding appears in marketing and agent materials, but the legal issuer on the application and policy should be confirmed by the buyer.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Final Expense Insurance With No Waiting Period

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Aetna plan should a buyer choose if they need full natural-death coverage from day one?
  • Does the Aetna Accendo Level plan really have no waiting period for natural death?

The relevant product is the Accendo Final Expense Individual Whole Life Insurance policy, specifically the Preferred and Standard Level Plans. These are the tiers that provide full natural-death coverage from policy issue [8].

The product family includes three plan types according to independent reviews: Preferred (Level), Standard (Level), and Modified [11]. The level plans are the ones that satisfy the no-waiting-period requirement. The Modified plan does not.

Issue ages for the level plans are reported as 40 through 89 [8]. One platform reported a narrower range of 45–89 from a product availability chart [14], which is a discrepancy buyers should verify for their state.

Coverage amounts range from $2,000 to $50,000, with maximums declining by age bracket: $50,000 for ages 40–55, $40,000 for 56–65, $30,000 for 66–75, and $25,000 for 76–89 [15].

The product is simplified issue. Applicants answer health questions and may undergo prescription-history verification, but no medical exam is required [17]. One platform described the underwriting as having four tiers — Super Preferred, Preferred, Standard, and Modified — which allows more precise placement than a two-tier structure [20].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Aetna's no-waiting-period final expense coverage?
  • Is Aetna's Accendo Level plan considered a strong fit for buyers who will answer health questions?

All seven platforms that evaluated fit agreed on the central point: the Accendo Preferred and Standard Level plans provide full natural-death coverage from day one with no waiting period, subject to underwriting approval [22].

Agreement was unanimous on several supporting points:

  • The product is permanent whole life insurance with level premiums, not term coverage [29].
  • Qualification requires answering health questions; no medical exam is required [31].
  • The Modified plan carries a two-year graded benefit for natural-cause death, returning premiums plus interest during the waiting period [34].
  • The product is sold through licensed agents rather than directly online [36].

Platforms also agreed that Aetna's underwriting is comparatively lenient for a simplified-issue product. One independent review stated that most seniors can qualify for coverage with no waiting period despite conditions such as COPD, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease [39]. Another reported that applicants with moderate health conditions may land in the Standard tier rather than being pushed directly to a graded product [41].

Fit ratings were positive across the board: anthropic, google, and grok rated Aetna "strong"; deepseek, kimi, openai, and perplexity rated it "good."

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is uncertain about Aetna's no-waiting-period final expense plan that a buyer should verify?
  • Do AI platforms disagree about Aetna's pricing or state availability for level-benefit coverage?

Platforms disagreed or were uncertain on several material points.

Issuing entity and branding. Sources use multiple names: Accendo Insurance Company, Accendo Life Insurance Company, Aetna Senior Products, and CVS Health/Aetna. One platform noted that the relationship between Aetna and Accendo is unclear and that the corporate structure was not verified in official sources (kimi). Another flagged that the legal issuer should be confirmed on the application and policy (openai).

State availability. One platform stated the product is unavailable in New York [42]. Another reported issue ages of 45–89 from a product availability chart, while most platforms reported 40–89 [43]. State-by-state variations in riders, face limits, and underwriting rules were noted but not fully resolved [46].

Pricing. No platform found a verified, current public rate sheet from Aetna or Accendo. Sample monthly rates for $10,000 of non-tobacco level coverage were reported by independent brokers at approximately $27/$35 at age 50, $41/$51 at age 60, $58/$73 at age 70, and $101/$140 at age 80 for female/male applicants [47]. These are illustrations, not binding quotes. One platform reported a different figure — $91.70 per month for a 65-year-old female with $20,000 of coverage [50] — which reflects a different face amount and cannot be directly compared.

Administrative fee. One sample policy shows a $40 annual administrative fee [51]. Whether that fee applies to all states and policy forms is unclear.

Rate tier criteria. The specific health conditions and timeframes that distinguish Preferred from Standard were not publicly detailed in the reviewed sources (deepseek, kimi).

Super Preferred discount. One platform reported that applicants who hold an Aetna Medicare Supplement policy may qualify for a 10% discount on Preferred rates, but whether this is automatic or requires a request is unclear [53].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does the Aetna Accendo Level plan offer for a buyer who needs day-one natural-death coverage?
  • How much coverage can a buyer get from Aetna's no-waiting-period final expense plan at older ages?

The features most relevant to this use case are the ones that determine whether the buyer actually gets no-waiting-period coverage.

Day-one natural-death benefit. The level plans are reported to pay the full face value from the policy issue date for death from natural causes or accidents [55]. This is the defining feature for this use case.

Simplified underwriting. Applicants answer health questions and may have prescription history reviewed. No medical exam or blood work is required [58]. This matches the buyer's stated willingness to complete simplified underwriting.

Permanent whole life structure. The policy is whole life with level premiums that are guaranteed not to increase, and it builds cash value over time [61].

Age range. Issue ages are reported as 40 through 89 for level plans [55]. The Modified plan is reported as available only to age 75 [64].

Coverage limits by age. Maximum face amounts decline with issue age: $50,000 (40–55), $40,000 (56–65), $30,000 (66–75), $25,000 (76–89), with a $2,000 minimum [66].

Optional riders. Accelerated Death Benefit (up to 50% of benefit for terminal, chronic, or critical illness), Accidental Death rider, and Children's Term rider were reported as available for additional fees (anthropic). State availability of specific riders varies (google).

Accidental death coverage. Even on the Modified plan, accidental death is reported as covered at the full benefit from the beginning [68].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Aetna's Accendo Level final expense plan cost per month, and are there policy fees?
  • Are Aetna's no-waiting-period final expense premiums guaranteed never to increase?

Pricing confidence across platforms was low to moderate. No platform located a verified, current public rate sheet from Aetna or Accendo for this product.

Sample rates. Independent broker illustrations for $10,000 of non-tobacco level coverage report approximately $27/$35 per month at age 50, $41/$51 at age 60, $58/$73 at age 70, and $101/$140 at age 80 for female/male applicants [69]. These are estimates, not binding quotes, and they vary by state, health tier, and payment mode.

One conflicting data point. A separate independent review reported $91.70 per month for a 65-year-old female with $20,000 of coverage [72]. This reflects a different face amount and cannot be directly compared to the $10,000 illustrations.

Administrative fee. A sample Accendo policy shows a $40 annual administrative fee [73]. Whether this fee applies to all states and policy forms is unclear.

Premium guarantees. Premiums are reported as level and guaranteed not to increase for the life of the policy [75].

Contract terms. The policy is continuing whole life coverage requiring ongoing premium payments. A 30-day grace period for missed payments was reported, along with non-forfeiture options including Reduced Paid-Up, Extended Term, and Automatic Premium Loans (anthropic). A standard 30-day free-look period was reported by one platform (google).

Cancellation. Cancellation is possible at any time, but fees or charges may apply per policy terms (anthropic). Specific surrender values and loan provisions were not detailed in available sources (kimi).

Tobacco. Tobacco users pay 30–60% higher premiums than non-tobacco applicants (anthropic).

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Aetna's Accendo Level plan best suited for among buyers who need no-waiting-period final expense coverage?
  • Is Aetna a good fit for a buyer with managed health conditions who wants day-one coverage?

Aetna's Accendo Level plans are best suited for applicants who want permanent final expense coverage with full natural-death protection from the beginning of the policy and who are willing to answer health questions to qualify (openai, anthropic, perplexity).

Specific buyer profiles that fit well:

  • Applicants age 40 through 89 who are willing to undergo simplified underwriting and may qualify for a Preferred or Standard class [76].
  • Applicants with managed health conditions — including COPD, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease — who may still qualify for a level plan rather than being downgraded to a graded product [78].
  • Buyers who want no medical exam but can answer health and prescription-history questions [81].
  • Buyers who want whole life coverage that builds cash value in addition to the death benefit [83].
  • Aetna Medicare Supplement policyholders who may qualify for a multi-policy discount [85].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Aetna for Final Expense Insurance With No Waiting Period?
  • Is Aetna a bad choice for a buyer who cannot pass simplified underwriting?

Aetna is probably not the best fit for several buyer profiles.

Applicants unlikely to qualify for a level plan. The desired no-waiting-period outcome is conditional on approval for Preferred or Standard Level. It is not guaranteed merely by applying (openai, perplexity). Applicants with significant health history may be offered the Modified plan or declined.

Applicants who need guaranteed acceptance. Aetna does not offer guaranteed-issue coverage with no health questions. All applicants must answer health questions to qualify (anthropic, kimi).

Buyers who want to avoid agent contact. Policies must be purchased through licensed agents. Online or mail-order application is not available [88].

Buyers seeking the absolute lowest premium. Some competitors may offer lower rates for equivalent coverage, and multi-carrier comparison is advisable (anthropic, kimi).

Residents of New York. One platform stated the product is unavailable in New York [91].

Buyers who need coverage above $50,000. The maximum face amount is $50,000, and it declines to $25,000 for applicants aged 76–89 [92].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Aetna for a buyer who cannot qualify for a level-benefit final expense plan?
  • When should a buyer choose a guaranteed-issue final expense policy instead of Aetna's Accendo Level plan?

Another carrier or product type may be better in several situations.

When the buyer cannot pass simplified underwriting. Guaranteed-issue products accept all health profiles but impose a mandatory two-year waiting period for natural death, returning premiums plus interest during the wait [94]. This does not meet the no-waiting-period requirement but may be the only option for applicants with severe or terminal conditions.

When the buyer wants lower verified pricing. One platform noted that Mutual of Omaha and Transamerica are close competitors for healthy day-one buyers, and that Transamerica offers a 10-Pay option that Accendo does not appear to offer [97]. Another platform suggested comparing Mutual of Omaha Living Promise Level or Transamerica Express Select for specific age and gender combinations (kimi).

When the buyer wants a higher financial-strength rating. Accendo/Aetna carries an "A" rating, while some competitors carry "A+" [97].

When the buyer needs a higher face amount. Coverage above $50,000, or above $25,000 for applicants over 75, requires a different carrier (google).

When the buyer lives in New York. A different carrier approved in that state is required [98].

When the buyer wants direct online purchase. Some carriers offer direct-to-consumer online application without agent contact (deepseek, anthropic).

Questions to Verify Before Buying

These questions were compiled from the verification lists supplied by the platforms that evaluated Aetna for this use case.

  1. Will the applicant be issued the Preferred or Standard Level Plan, with 100% of the natural-death benefit payable from the policy effective date? (openai, perplexity)
  2. If the applicant is not approved for a level plan, will the application be declined or converted to the Modified Plan, and what exact natural-death benefit applies during each of the first two policy years? (openai, anthropic)
  3. Which legal entity issues the policy, and what is the exact state-approved policy form number? (openai, deepseek, perplexity)
  4. What are the exact monthly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual premiums, including any policy or administrative fee? (openai, anthropic, perplexity)
  5. Are premiums guaranteed for the life of the policy, and what happens after missed payments or lapse? (openai, anthropic)
  6. What are the available face amounts, issue-age limits, riders, exclusions, contestability rules, and accidental-death provisions in the buyer's state? (openai, google)
  7. What is the free-look period and cancellation or refund procedure? (openai, deepseek, perplexity)
  8. Is the quoted product available directly to consumers or only through a licensed agent, and how is the agent compensated? (openai, anthropic)
  9. If the buyer holds an Aetna Medicare Supplement policy, is the Super Preferred 10% discount automatic or does it require a request? (anthropic)
  10. What specific health conditions and timeframes will disqualify the applicant from Preferred versus Standard versus Modified plans? (anthropic, kimi)

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Aetna, through Accendo Insurance Company, is a good fit for a buyer who wants permanent final expense insurance with full natural-death coverage from day one and is willing to answer health questions. All seven platforms that evaluated fit rated it good or strong, and the Accendo Preferred and Standard Level plans are consistently described as providing full benefits from policy issue with no waiting period.

The fit is conditional. The no-waiting-period outcome depends on qualifying for a level tier. Applicants who do not qualify may be offered the Modified plan, which carries a two-year graded benefit for natural death and does not satisfy the stated priority. The product is sold only through licensed agents, and the legal issuer is Accendo Insurance Company rather than Aetna itself.

Buyers should obtain a state-specific quote, confirm in writing which tier they qualify for, and compare at least one or two competing level-benefit carriers before purchasing. Platform agreement on product features does not prove product quality or suitability for any individual applicant.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from structured research responses supplied by seven AI platforms: openai, anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi, and perplexity. Each platform was asked to recommend life insurance carriers for a consumer who wants permanent final expense insurance with full natural-death coverage from the beginning of the policy and is willing to answer health questions and complete simplified underwriting.

The research date for this study is 2026-09-21. Platform-reported research dates differ: deepseek reported 2026-01-15, while the other six platforms reported 2026-09-23. These platform dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Three of the seven platforms named Aetna during the ranking stage: deepseek, google, and kimi. All seven platforms evaluated Aetna's fit for this use case. Fit ratings were: anthropic (strong), deepseek (good), google (strong), grok (strong), kimi (good), openai (good), perplexity (good).

Citations in this article are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied source URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. Deepseek's research was conducted with search disabled.

This article is part of a broader Final Expense Insurance With No Waiting Period consensus study covering multiple carriers.

For additional context on final expense and other life insurance product categories, see the category directory.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations affect the findings in this review.

Platform-reported evidence. All citations are platform-reported. No claim in this article was independently verified by the writer stage. Platform agreement on a product feature does not constitute independent confirmation.

Differing research dates. Deepseek's research was conducted on 2026-01-15, approximately eight months before the other platforms' research on 2026-09-23. Product details, pricing, and availability may have changed between those dates.

No-search platform. Deepseek conducted its research with search disabled, meaning its findings are based on model knowledge rather than retrieved sources. Deepseek's claims should be treated as platform-reported and requiring verification.

Official-site retrieval gaps. The official Aetna website did not provide a directly verified, current public product page for this specific final expense product in the reviewed search results. Product identity and terms were cross-checked against an Aetna/Accendo commission document, a sample policy, and independent broker materials. Official-site retrieval for some mentions was incomplete.

Pricing uncertainty. No platform located a verified, current public rate sheet from Aetna or Accendo. All pricing figures in this review are broker illustrations or independent review estimates, not binding quotes.

Entity and branding complexity. Sources use multiple names for the issuing entity, including Accendo Insurance Company, Accendo Life Insurance Company, Aetna Senior Products, and CVS Health/Aetna. The legal issuer should be confirmed on the application and policy.

State variation. Product availability, issue ages, face limits, riders, policy forms, and underwriting rules can differ by state. Complete state-by-state eligibility for any specific buyer profile was not fully resolved from the retrieved sources.

No independently verified claim-payment data. No independently verified claim-payment or customer-outcome data specific to this product was identified in the reviewed sources.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • 090126 effective 09-04-26 Medicare Supplement Accendo Final Expense: https://www.aetnaseniorproducts.com/assets/pdf/CGFLP01577ProductAvailabilityChart.pdf
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.aetna.com/
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.aetna.com/#Find
  • Additional AI research evidence98 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    3. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-10
    5. AI research evidence record grok:2
    6. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    7. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-10
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-6
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    13. AI research evidence record grok:0
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-6
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-4
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-10
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record grok:2
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-2026
    28. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-1
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-18
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    38. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-18
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-6
    42. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    48. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-2026
    49. AI research evidence record grok:4
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-11
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    52. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-9
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-6
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    63. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    65. AI research evidence record grok:0
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-1
    67. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    70. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-2026
    71. AI research evidence record grok:4
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-11
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    75. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-18
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
    84. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-9
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-18
    89. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    90. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    91. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-1
    93. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:choicemutual-guaranteed
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:statefarm-guaranteed
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:policyreviewcenter-types
    97. AI research evidence record kimi:guaranteedlifeinsured-comparison
    98. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Why AETNA Burial Insurance Is The Best For Seniors In 2025: https://insuranceforburial.com/blog/aetna-senior-insurance-review/
  • Additional AI research evidence98 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    3. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-10
    5. AI research evidence record grok:2
    6. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    7. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-10
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-6
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    13. AI research evidence record grok:0
    14. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-1
    16. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-6
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-4
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-5
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-10
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    25. AI research evidence record grok:2
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-2026
    28. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-1
    35. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-18
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    38. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-18
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-6
    42. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    48. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-2026
    49. AI research evidence record grok:4
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-11
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    52. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-9
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-6
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    63. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    65. AI research evidence record grok:0
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-1
    67. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    70. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-2026
    71. AI research evidence record grok:4
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:22-11
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    75. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:13-1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:28-18
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-9
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-6
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-5
    84. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-9
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-18
    89. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    90. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    91. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:14-1
    93. AI research evidence record google:1.1.5
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:choicemutual-guaranteed
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:statefarm-guaranteed
    96. AI research evidence record kimi:policyreviewcenter-types
    97. AI research evidence record kimi:guaranteedlifeinsured-comparison
    98. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 21, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
41
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#4

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

29 independent · 10 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

28 direct · 12 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

11b1583a4800a2f18e21ba0892501bf50cd5924d093cb8ad263e9e0e58bdb0a2