Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Transamerica Final Expense Insurance Fit Review for Smokers

Transamerica is a reasonable but not clearly best-in-class fit for a senior smoker seeking $15,000–$25,000 of permanent final expense coverage.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Transamerica is a reasonable but not clearly best-in-class fit for a senior smoker seeking $15,000–$25,000 of permanent final expense coverage. All seven AI platforms named Transamerica during ranking discovery, and it finished first overall in the final ranking. Its strongest case rests on permanent simplified-issue whole life with explicit tobacco rate classes, published face amounts that cover the target range, and a large A-rated carrier. The main limitation is pricing: independent comparisons place Transamerica's tobacco rates above several competitors, and no current smoker-specific premium for the target buyer is publicly confirmed. Buyers should treat it as a strong candidate to quote, not an automatic winner.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage7 of 7 included platforms
Share of included platform responses100%
Average listed rank3.43
Best listed rank2
Relevant product/model/planFinal Expense Solutions Portfolio — Immediate Solution, 10-Pay Solution, Easy Solution, and FE Express Solution / Express Select
Overall use-case fitGood (4 platforms); Mixed (3 platforms) — 7 platforms analyzed
Research date2026-09-22

Why Transamerica Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Transamerica qualify as a finalist for smokers seeking $15,000–$25,000 of final expense coverage?
  • Is Transamerica a reputable carrier for a senior smoker who wants permanent final expense insurance?

Transamerica qualified because every included platform named it during ranking discovery and because its published product structure matches the buyer's stated criteria. All seven platforms — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Grok, Kimi, OpenAI, and Perplexity — listed Transamerica among recommended carriers for this use case, giving it a 100% mention rate and an average listed rank of 3.43. It finished first in the final ranking.

The qualification rests on four published attributes. First, Transamerica markets permanent whole life final expense coverage rather than term, matching the buyer's requirement for lifetime protection [1]. Second, its product guide lists separate Tobacco and Non-Tobacco underwriting classes for Immediate Solution and 10-Pay Solution, so current cigarette use is rated rather than automatically disqualifying [3]. Third, published face amounts include the $15,000–$25,000 target for most age bands [3]. Fourth, independent reviewers describe Transamerica as a top-three quoting target for tobacco cases and note strong financial ratings [5].

The carrier is a long-established U.S. life insurer, and independent reviews cite an AM Best rating of A (Excellent) [7]. That reputation signal supports the buyer's "reputable carrier" criterion, though no independent complaint-index data was located in the reviewed sources [7].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Final Expense Insurance for Smokers

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Transamerica plan should a smoker choose for $15,000–$25,000 of permanent final expense coverage?
  • Is Transamerica's Immediate Solution or FE Express Solution better for a current cigarette smoker who wants day-one coverage?

The most relevant offering is the Final Expense Solutions Portfolio, which includes Immediate Solution, 10-Pay Solution, Easy Solution, and the newer FE Express Solution / Express Select. These are simplified-issue whole life products with level premiums and permanent coverage [9].

Immediate Solution is the core permanent product. The cited product guide describes coverage as paid up at age 121, with level premiums and Tobacco/Non-Tobacco underwriting classes [10]. The 10-Pay Solution variant is designed so premiums are paid over 10 years, after which the policy is paid up for life [10].

FE Express Solution is the digital-first option. Company materials describe it as the latest addition to the final expense suite, with underwriting decisions possible in as little as 10 minutes and no medical exams [13]. It is not guaranteed issue; the underwriter reserves the right to request additional medical exams and data [16].

Easy Solution is the graded-benefit fallback. It has a $1,000–$25,000 issue range and an Unismoke class, and it may provide less favorable early-death protection [10]. The official portfolio page states a $1,000–$50,000 range for ages 0–85 with a $25,000 maximum for Easy Solution at ages 18–80 (official:C1).

Platforms did not fully agree on naming. OpenAI, Perplexity, and Kimi treat "FE Express Solution" and "Immediate Solution" as related or overlapping; Kimi explicitly notes it is unclear whether they are distinct products or naming variations [17]. Buyers should confirm the exact plan name on any quote.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Transamerica for smokers who need permanent final expense coverage?
  • Does Transamerica offer permanent coverage with guaranteed level premiums for tobacco users?

Platforms agreed on several structural points. All seven described Transamerica's final expense products as permanent whole life coverage with level premiums, matching the buyer's permanence requirement [18].

They also agreed that Transamerica explicitly rates tobacco use rather than excluding smokers. The product guide lists Tobacco and Non-Tobacco classes [25], and underwriting guidance defines tobacco/nicotine broadly to include cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, vaping, nicotine replacement products, and certain cessation aids [26].

A third area of agreement: simplified-issue underwriting with no medical exam. Multiple platforms cited health questions and prescription-history checks rather than full medical underwriting [28].

Fourth, platforms agreed the target face amount is generally available. Published maximums are age-dependent — up to $50,000 at younger issue ages, $40,000 for ages 56–65, $30,000 for ages 66–75, and $25,000 for ages 76–85 — so $15,000–$25,000 falls within range for most ages [25].

Finally, platforms agreed Transamerica is a reputable, financially stable carrier. Independent reviews cite an AM Best A (Excellent) rating and describe it as a large, long-established insurer [33].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Platforms split on whether Transamerica is a good or mixed fit. Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, and Perplexity rated it "good." Grok, Kimi, and OpenAI rated it "mixed." The disagreement centers on tobacco pricing competitiveness.

Kimi reported that Transamerica Express Select runs the highest tobacco rates among five major carriers at every age bracket, with a 45–65% premium gap versus Mutual of Omaha [37]. Grok similarly found Transamerica smoker rates higher than Mutual of Omaha, Aetna, AIG, and Aflac for a 65-year-old female at $10,000 coverage [39]. Anthropic found USAA and Mutual of Omaha cheaper for 50-year-old smokers [40].

Other platforms reached the opposite conclusion on relative pricing. Anthropic cited an independent review calling Transamerica's smoker rates "some of the best in the final expense industry" [42], and Mozdex described it as frequently cheapest for smokers, larger builds, and health conditions [43]. OpenAI stated plainly that no independent source reviewed established Transamerica as among the lowest-priced carriers for smokers [44].

Pricing visibility is a second uncertainty. No platform located a current, age-, sex-, state-, and face-amount-specific smoker premium for the target buyer [44]. Available rate tables are historical or producer-oriented.

Product naming is a third conflict. Platforms used Express Select, FE Express, Immediate Solution, and Final Expense Solutions Portfolio inconsistently, and Kimi flagged that these may be naming variations rather than distinct products [38].

State availability is a fourth. FE Express Solution is reported unavailable in California, New York, and Pennsylvania, among other jurisdictions [47]. The state-availability document reviewed is not clearly current for 2026 [49].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What underwriting and coverage features does Transamerica offer a smoker who wants $15,000–$25,000 of final expense insurance?
  • Does Transamerica pay the full death benefit from day one for a smoker, or is there a waiting period?

Transamerica's use-case strengths are permanent coverage, explicit tobacco classes, simplified underwriting, and target-range face amounts. Its key limitation is that the best rate class is not guaranteed.

On coverage structure, Immediate Solution and 10-Pay Solution are whole life products with level premiums; Immediate Solution is described as paid up at age 121 and 10-Pay Solution as paid up after 10 years of premiums [50]. NAIC describes whole life as permanent coverage with a fixed death benefit and identifies limited-payment whole life as coverage lasting for life with premiums paid over a shorter period [51].

On underwriting, Transamerica markets Express Protect underwriting through its electronic application, with potential same-day approval without exams or labs [52]. FE Express Solution is described as delivering approval and policy delivery in as little as 10 minutes [53]. This is a process advantage, not a guarantee of approval or acceptance of every smoker [52].

On tobacco classification, the underwriting guide defines tobacco/nicotine use broadly, and a 12-month lookback applies [56]. A smoker who quit 12 or more months prior may qualify for non-tobacco rates [57].

On benefit timing, Immediate Solution and FE Express provide day-one full death benefit for preferred and standard classes [59]. Easy Solution is graded, with a limited death benefit in the first two years — reported as 110% of premiums paid — then full payout thereafter [59].

On health acceptance, Anthropic reported that Transamerica covers conditions such as congestive heart failure, COPD, diabetes with complications, and Parkinson's on day one under FE Express [61]. Kimi reported that Transamerica's primary advantage is more permissive underwriting when tobacco use is combined with other conditions such as diabetes plus COPD or heart disease with stents [62]. These are platform-reported findings from independent reviews, not company guarantees.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Transamerica final expense insurance cost per month for a smoker, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • Is Transamerica's smoker pricing cheaper than Mutual of Omaha or USAA for $15,000–$25,000 of coverage?

Current smoker-specific pricing is not publicly confirmed. Published materials show separate tobacco and non-tobacco rate tables, but they do not establish a current 2026 premium for the target buyer's age, state, sex, health, and face amount [63].

Where figures exist, they conflict. Kimi published Express Select tobacco rates for $10,000 coverage: age 60 male smoker $63/month, female $51; age 65 male $78, female $61; age 70 male $101, female $77; age 75 male $155, female $117; age 80 male $218, female $163 [66]. Grok reported a 65-year-old female smoker at $10,000 paying roughly $92/month and a 65-year-old male roughly $125/month [67]. These figures do not reconcile, and both are platform-reported.

Anthropic reported non-tobacco baselines of roughly $61–$78/month for a 65-year-old at $10,000 coverage and $78–$103/month for a 70-year-old at $15,000 coverage, with smokers paying a 30–50% surcharge above those baselines [68]. MoneyGeek data cited by Anthropic found USAA cheapest for a 50-year-old female smoker at $45/month and Mutual of Omaha cheapest for a 50-year-old male smoker at $56/month for $15,000 coverage [70].

On fees, no separately itemized consumer fee schedule was identified in the reviewed public materials [64]. Optional riders may increase cost, but specific rider charges were not verified [64]. Anthropic listed available riders including an Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, Nursing Home Benefit, and Children's/Grandchildren's Rider, plus a Concierge Planning Rider offered at no additional cost on some products [68].

On contract terms, coverage remains subject to the issued policy contract, application approval, exclusions, lapse provisions, and state-specific forms [64]. The reviewed materials do not establish a current free-look period, surrender-charge schedule, reinstatement terms, or policy-loan provisions for the specific policy [64]. Grok reported policy loans available at a variable rate up to 8% and level premiums to age 121 [73]. Google reported a standard two-year contestability period from issue [74].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Transamerica best suited for among smokers who need permanent final expense coverage?
  • Is Transamerica a good choice for a smoker with COPD, diabetes, or a prior heart condition who wants day-one coverage?

Transamerica is best suited for a smoker who wants permanent whole life coverage rather than term, needs roughly $15,000–$25,000, and values simplified underwriting over the absolute lowest premium [75].

It fits applicants who may benefit from no-exam, no-lab electronic underwriting and potentially same-day decisions [75]. It fits smokers with paired health conditions — diabetes plus COPD, insulin-dependent diabetes, or heart disease with stents — who may be declined or graded by stricter carriers [79]. It fits buyers who want a 10-pay structure to own the policy outright in 10 years [81]. And it fits buyers who want a large, A-rated carrier with a long operating history [83].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Transamerica for final expense insurance as a smoker?
  • Is Transamerica a bad choice for a smoker who needs guaranteed-issue coverage with no health questions?

Transamerica is probably not the best fit for a smoker prioritizing the absolute lowest monthly cost. Multiple platforms found USAA, Mutual of Omaha, AIG Corebridge, Aflac, or Aetna cheaper for specific age and gender cohorts [85].

It is also not ideal for buyers who need guaranteed-issue coverage with no health questions. Express Select and Immediate Solution are simplified-issue, not guaranteed-issue, and the underwriter can request additional medical exams [89]. Buyers who require fully transparent online consumer pricing before applying will also be frustrated, since current smoker rates are not publicly posted [91].

Applicants age 85 or older face a $25,000 coverage cap, which may limit the upper end of the target range [93]. Residents of California, New York, or Pennsylvania cannot access FE Express Solution and must use an alternative product [95]. And applicants previously declined by any Transamerica company face an automatic decline on a final expense application [96].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Transamerica for a smoker who needs the lowest guaranteed tobacco premium?
  • When should a smoker choose a guaranteed-issue carrier instead of Transamerica?

Another carrier may be better when a competing insurer offers a materially lower guaranteed tobacco premium for the same age, state, face amount, and benefit structure [97]. MoneyGeek data cited by Anthropic identified USAA at $45/month for a 50-year-old female smoker and Mutual of Omaha at $56/month for a 50-year-old male smoker at $15,000 coverage [98]. Kimi recommended obtaining quotes from Mutual of Omaha, AIG Corebridge, and Aflac first, treating Transamerica as appropriate mainly when those carriers decline due to paired health conditions [100].

A guaranteed-issue carrier may be better when the buyer has significant health impairments and needs coverage with no health questions and an acceptable graded-benefit schedule [97]. A carrier with transparent online consumer pricing may be better when the buyer wants posted rates rather than an agent-generated quote [97]. And a carrier offering a shorter payment period or different cash-value guarantees may be better when the 10-Pay structure does not match the buyer's needs [97].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

  • For the applicant's exact age, state, sex, health history, and cigarette use, what is the guaranteed monthly premium for $15,000, $20,000, and $25,000? [102]
  • Will current cigarette use receive a Tobacco class, and how are vaping, cigars, nicotine gum, patches, and cessation medications classified? [102]
  • Does the applicant qualify for Immediate Solution with full first-day death benefit, or only Easy Solution with a graded benefit? [102]
  • Is the product currently available in the applicant's state, and which legal entity issues the policy? [102]
  • For 10-Pay Solution, are premiums guaranteed for exactly 10 years and is the policy fully paid up afterward under the contract? [102]
  • What are the guaranteed cash value, nonforfeiture, loan, lapse, reinstatement, and surrender provisions? [102]
  • What riders are available, what do they cost, and can they reduce the death benefit or cash value? [102]
  • What is the current free-look period and cancellation/refund procedure? [102]
  • How does the quoted premium compare with at least two other tobacco-rated final-expense carriers using identical assumptions? [102]
  • What is Transamerica's independent complaint index and claims-paying history versus peers? [108]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Transamerica earns a mixed-to-good consensus fit rating for a senior smoker seeking $15,000–$25,000 of permanent final expense coverage. All seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and it finished first overall. Four platforms rated the fit "good"; three rated it "mixed."

The strongest case is structural: permanent whole life, explicit tobacco classes, simplified underwriting, target-range face amounts, and an A-rated carrier. The strongest caution is pricing: independent comparisons place Transamerica's tobacco rates above several competitors at specific ages, and no current smoker-specific premium for the target buyer is publicly confirmed. Platform agreement on product structure does not establish that Transamerica offers the best price or the best consumer experience.

The practical verdict: Transamerica is a credible candidate to quote, particularly for a smoker with paired health conditions who may be declined elsewhere, but it should not be selected without a current state-specific quote, confirmation of immediate versus graded benefits, and comparison against at least two competing tobacco-rated carriers.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit-research responses from seven AI platforms — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, Grok, Kimi, OpenAI, and Perplexity — each of which evaluated Transamerica against the same buyer prompt: a senior who currently uses cigarettes and wants approximately $15,000–$25,000 of permanent final expense life insurance from a reputable carrier with reasonable tobacco-user pricing, straightforward underwriting, permanent coverage, and clear policy guarantees.

Platform responses were collected on the research date of 2026-09-22. Each platform supplied its own citations, which are preserved as platform-reported evidence. The ranking stage counted only platforms that named Transamerica during discovery; all seven did. Fit ratings, product names, pricing figures, and limitations are reported as each platform supplied them, with conflicts preserved rather than resolved.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date: DeepSeek reported 2026-06-01, while the other six platforms reported 2026-09-23. These are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. DeepSeek's response was produced without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

No platform located a current, buyer-specific smoker premium for the target profile. Published rate tables are historical or producer-oriented. Product naming is inconsistent across platforms, and it is unclear whether FE Express Solution and Immediate Solution are distinct products or naming variations. State availability documents reviewed are not clearly current for 2026.

Platform agreement on product structure does not prove product quality, price competitiveness, or claims experience. No independent complaint-index or regulatory data for Transamerica was located in the reviewed sources. Buyers should verify all pricing, eligibility, and contract terms directly with the carrier or a licensed agent before purchasing.

See the broader Final Expense Insurance for Smokers consensus index for comparisons across qualified options.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Transamerica Final Expense Solutions Portfolio: https://cloud.email.transamerica.com/final-expense/
  • Final expense insurance: peace of mind when it matters most: https://www.aegon.com/newsroom/news/2026/transamerica-final-expense-express-solutions
  • Transamerica Simplifies Final Expense Insurance for Consumers and Agents: https://www.transamerica.com/press-release/transamerica-simplifies-final-expense-insurance-consumers-and-agents
  • Additional AI research evidence108 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-10
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-19
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-8
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-1
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    15. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-1
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:13
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    24. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-5
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:16-13
    30. AI research evidence record grok:12
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-10
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-8
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    36. AI research evidence record grok:4
    37. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    38. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    39. AI research evidence record grok:2
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-12
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-5
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    46. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    47. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-21
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    60. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    62. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    65. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    66. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    67. AI research evidence record grok:2
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:44-3
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    72. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    73. AI research evidence record grok:4
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-1
    77. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    84. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    87. AI research evidence record grok:2
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-10
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    95. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    96. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    100. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    105. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    108. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Final Expense Health Reference Guide - Axiom Virtual Academy: https://apex-va.com/health-reference-guide/
  • Additional AI research evidence108 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-10
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-19
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-8
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-1
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-1
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    15. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-1
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:13
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    24. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:7-5
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:16-13
    30. AI research evidence record grok:12
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-10
    32. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-8
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    36. AI research evidence record grok:4
    37. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    38. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    39. AI research evidence record grok:2
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:41-12
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-5
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    45. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    46. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    47. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-21
    58. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    60. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    62. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    64. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    65. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    66. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    67. AI research evidence record grok:2
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:44-3
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    72. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    73. AI research evidence record grok:4
    74. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:10-1
    77. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-15
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-transamerica
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    82. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-8
    84. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    87. AI research evidence record grok:2
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-3
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-10
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    95. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    96. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-6
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-7
    100. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    102. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    103. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-5
    105. AI research evidence record google:1.2.8
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-1
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-smokers
    108. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
35
Ranking mentions
7 of 7
Platform share
100%
Final consensus rank
#1

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

23 independent · 9 company-owned · 3 unclear

Evidence support

25 direct · 10 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

a50939eb865120ca24caa408d8540b60a7c02488ecc14b0c2373149351a060c5