Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Lincoln Financial Survivorship Universal Life Insurance Fit Review for Estate and Legacy Planning

Lincoln Financial is a good fit for a married couple or two insured individuals seeking second-to-die permanent coverage for estate liquidity, inheritance, or legacy planning, with meaningful qualifications.

Research: 2026-09-217 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Lincoln Financial is a good fit for a married couple or two insured individuals seeking second-to-die permanent coverage for estate liquidity, inheritance, or legacy planning, with meaningful qualifications. Five of the seven platforms in this study named Lincoln Financial during the ranking stage, and six of seven returned a usable fit assessment. The strongest reason to consider it is a purpose-built survivorship product family — including Lincoln WealthPreserve 2 Survivorship Indexed Universal Life, Lincoln AssetEdge SVUL, and Lincoln LifeGuarantee Survivorship Universal Life — backed by reported A-range financial-strength ratings. The main limitation is that no platform verified buyer-specific pricing, and product names, guarantees, and state availability conflict across sources.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage5 of 7 platforms (deepseek, google, grok, kimi, openai)
Share of included platform responses71.4%
Average listed rank4.6
Best listed rank3
Relevant product/model/planLincoln WealthPreserve 2 Survivorship Indexed Universal Life (SIUL); Lincoln AssetEdge SVUL; Lincoln LifeGuarantee Survivorship Universal Life (SUL); Lincoln LifeElements SUL (unconfirmed)
Overall use-case fitGood, with qualification — six of seven platforms returned a usable fit assessment; five rated it "good," one rated it "mixed"
Research date2026-09-21

Why Lincoln Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Lincoln Financial a good choice for Survivorship Universal Life Insurance for Estate and Legacy Planning?
  • How many AI platforms named Lincoln Financial for survivorship universal life, and at what average rank?

Lincoln Financial qualified because it markets survivorship life products explicitly positioned for estate and legacy planning, and because it was named by five of the seven platforms during ranking discovery. Its average listed rank was 4.6, with a best listed rank of 3 and a final rank of 4.

The company's public individual life insurance page markets survivorship products aligned with estate and legacy planning [1]. Lincoln's public survivorship-life product listings include Lincoln SVUL, Lincoln PreservationEdge SVUL, and Lincoln Ensemble SVUL [2]. Lincoln's variable-universal-life page identifies survivorship life products and contract forms, supporting the existence of a survivorship product family [3].

Lincoln also announced enhancements to its Survivorship Indexed Universal Life offerings, describing new strategies for goal-based outcomes [4]. Independent reviewers have cited Lincoln as offering survivorship GUL and IUL with competitive pricing among quality carriers [5], and one review ranked Lincoln among the best indexed universal life companies and a carrier regularly illustrated for estate-planning clients [6].

Carrier scale supports qualification. Third-party and regulatory sources describe Lincoln as a large U.S. life insurer with substantial life operations [7]. Lincoln reports AM Best A, Fitch A+, Moody's A2, and S&P A+ financial-strength ratings for its principal life-insurance subsidiaries, with stable outlooks, as of July 29, 2026 [8]. AM Best independently reported an A financial-strength rating for The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Lincoln LifeAnnuit Company of New York on March 13, 2026 [9].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Survivorship Universal Life Insurance for Estate and Legacy Planning

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Lincoln Financial survivorship product should a buyer choose for estate liquidity and legacy planning?
  • Does Lincoln WealthPreserve 2 SIUL pay a death benefit after the second insured dies?

The most consistently documented product across platforms is Lincoln WealthPreserve 2 Survivorship Indexed Universal Life (SIUL), a second-to-die indexed universal life policy. Lincoln WealthPreserve 2 SIUL is built for couples who want protection for two lives under one policy and offers long-term protection, built-in guarantees, and lifelong flexibility [10]. It offers an extended guaranteed death benefit, growth potential with downside protection, and optional features for estate-planning strategies [11].

Product detail varies by platform. One platform reported issue ages 20–80, a $100,000 minimum face amount ($25,000 guaranteed issue), six indexed accounts including S&P 500 and Fidelity AIM options, and riders including Estate Protection, Extended No-Lapse, Overloan Protection, and Policy Split Option [12]. Another reported six indexed account options, including two Fidelity AIM Dividend Indexed Accounts and four indexed accounts linked to the S&P 500 [16]. A third reported a minimum 25-year no-lapse guarantee period, extendable via an Extended No-Lapse Premium Rider [17].

Lincoln AssetEdge SVUL is a survivorship variable universal life policy that insures two lives and pays a benefit after the second insured's death, designed with competitive short-pay pricing and a no-lapse guarantee [18]. It offers death benefit protection plus growth potential and defines level, account-value, and return-of-premium benefit options [19]. It covers two lives under one survivorship policy, offering death benefit coverage plus growth through more than 75 investment options and four indexed accounts [21]. Lincoln launched AssetEdge SVUL in January 2025 [22].

Lincoln LifeGuarantee Survivorship Universal Life is a guaranteed universal life policy covering two lives, with a competitive pricing structure and flexible premium payment options [23]. One platform's verified materials for this product date to 2011 and describe two irreversible guarantee options — a Lifetime Option and a Flex Option — plus an automatically included Coverage Protection Guarantee [24].

Product naming is inconsistent across platforms. The requested names Lincoln LifeElements SUL and Lincoln AssetEdge SUL appear in ranking-stage materials, but reviewed public Lincoln pages do not clearly confirm current nationwide availability and exact contract forms for each name. One platform could not verify whether LifeGuarantee SUL remains actively sold or has been replaced [24].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Lincoln Financial for survivorship universal life estate planning?
  • Is Lincoln Financial's survivorship product actually designed to pay after the second death?

Platforms agreed on four points: the second-to-die structure, estate-planning positioning, multiple survivorship product designs, and reported financial strength.

On structure, Lincoln has historically offered survivorship versions of universal-life products that insure two lives under one policy and pay the death benefit after the second death, directly matching the target use case [25]. Lincoln's survivorship VUL messaging says the product insures two lives and pays after the second death [26]. Lincoln describes survivorship universal life as insuring two lives under one policy and paying the death benefit upon the second death [25].

On estate positioning, Lincoln positions its permanent life products for asset preservation, legacy creation, and estate-tax liquidity [27]. Lincoln markets survivorship products for estate planning, legacy needs, wealth transfer, and tax-efficient preservation of assets [28]. The WealthPreserve 2 SIUL death benefit is income tax-free per IRC Section 101(a), and if properly structured in an irrevocable trust, the life insurance proceeds may be free from estate taxes [31].

On product breadth, Lincoln offers more than one survivorship chassis — SVUL and SIUL — letting buyers choose between investment-linked and indexed designs [28]. Lincoln's public materials identify survivorship UL/VUL products and list multiple survivorship contracts [33].

On financial strength, Lincoln's principal life-insurance subsidiaries were reported by Lincoln as AM Best A, Fitch A+, Moody's A2, and S&P A+, all with stable outlooks, as of July 29, 2026 [35]. AM Best affirmed an A (Excellent) Financial Strength Rating and a+ Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating for The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company as of March 13, 2026 [36]. These ratings address insurer financial strength and claims-paying ability, not product performance or policy guarantees.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • What are the biggest uncertainties about Lincoln Financial survivorship universal life for estate planning?
  • Is Lincoln WealthPreserve 2 SIUL available in New York?

Platform disagreement centered on product currency, pricing, ratings outlook, and state availability.

Product currency is unresolved. One platform found only LifeGuarantee SUL materials dated 2011 and could not verify whether that product remains actively sold or has been replaced [37]. Another found that older survivorship UL references create uncertainty about which survivorship UL is actively sold versus historical [38]. A third noted that the exact products named in ranking-stage recommendations are not all clearly presented as currently available public retail offerings [41].

Pricing is unverified across every platform. No public buyer-specific premium schedule was verified for the named survivorship products [43]. Lincoln does not publish standard survivorship UL premium tables publicly for this use case [44]. Publicly verified premium pricing is unavailable; Lincoln's survivorship products are typically illustration-based [45]. No independent public evidence was located proving that Lincoln's premiums are competitive for this specific buyer profile.

Ratings outlook diverges. Lincoln's own page reports stable outlooks as of July 29, 2026 [46], while Moody's changed the outlooks on Lincoln and its affiliates to negative from stable [47]. One platform flagged this divergence and noted no explanation was provided for the outlook difference.

State availability is a documented limitation. WealthPreserve 2 SIUL form ICC22-SUL6094 and state variations are not available in New York [48]. A carrier-by-state listing indicates Lincoln survivorship products and riders can vary by state and includes a not-available-in-New-York note for WealthPreserve SIUL [49]. It is unclear whether Lincoln LifeGuarantee SUL or AssetEdge SVUL are available in New York.

Guarantee scope is uncertain. A guarantee described for WealthPreserve 2 IUL cannot be assumed to apply to a survivorship version without the actual policy form and illustration. Lincoln WealthPreserve 2 IUL materials describe a conditional guarantee lasting up to 40 years or age 90, subject to minimum-premium requirements and a maximum issue age of 79 [43].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What survivorship features does Lincoln Financial offer for estate liquidity and legacy planning?
  • How large a death benefit can Lincoln Financial issue for a survivorship policy?

Lincoln's survivorship features map to estate liquidity, legacy transfer, and large-case underwriting, but several capabilities are platform-reported rather than independently verified.

Second-to-die structure is the core capability. Lincoln survivorship products cover two lives and pay at the second insured's death, matching the core buyer need [50]. Lincoln says survivorship coverage may be easier to qualify for and can provide a higher death benefit for a potentially lower premium than two separate policies [50].

Large-case capacity is documented but conditional. A Lincoln professional-program document describes survivorship product availability and a professional life-insurance program with face amounts up to $20 million for qualifying applicants aged 25–65 [53]. Independent review material cites death benefit amounts that can exceed $20 million for eligible applicants [54]. This does not establish that every survivorship case qualifies for that amount or program.

Rider depth is a repeated strength. Lincoln offers one of the most extensive rider menus in the industry, allowing policy customization [55]. Survivorship products include an Accelerated Benefits Rider (with or without first death benefit), a Supplemental Survivorship Term Insurance Rider (Estate Protection Rider), a Supplemental Increase Rider, an Enhanced Overloan Protection Endorsement, and an Extended No-Lapse Premium Rider [55]. Optional living benefits for unexpected care expenses are available on AssetEdge SVUL [57].

Cash-value mechanics carry tradeoffs. The indexed product materials describe multiple indexed accounts with downside protection and an optional chronic-illness feature, but indexed-crediting potential is not a guarantee and policy values remain subject to charges, crediting limits, rider terms, and lapse risk [59]. Cash value earns interest based on a crediting formula tied to index performance with a guaranteed floor (typically 0–1%) protecting from market losses; growth is subject to a cap or participation rate, and specific caps and participation rates vary by product and change periodically [60]. Growth is not guaranteed, and policy charges remain in effect and may reduce policy value [61].

Policy-loan and surrender risk applies. Lincoln's public disclosures state that loans and withdrawals can reduce death benefits, interest is charged on loans, and UL contracts may impose surrender charges; historical Lincoln disclosures indicate surrender-charge periods can range from 0 to 25 years depending on product [62].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Lincoln Financial survivorship universal life cost per month, and what fees apply?
  • What contract terms and surrender charges should a buyer expect from Lincoln Financial survivorship coverage?

No platform verified a buyer-specific premium for any Lincoln survivorship product. Pricing confidence is low across all six platforms that returned a usable fit assessment.

Premiums are individualized. Premiums and required funding depend on ages, sex, underwriting classes, tobacco status, face amount, state, riders, death-benefit option, planned duration, and policy design [63]. A guaranteed and non-guaranteed illustration is required for meaningful comparison. Monthly premiums for survivorship policies are determined by underwriting on two insured lives, with premiums typically lower per unit of death benefit than individual policies due to the second-to-die structure [64].

Documented cost elements vary by product and era. For an AssetEdge survivorship VUL rider example, an accelerated benefit payment is discounted and a $250 administrative fee is deducted from each payment [65]. One platform's 2011-era LifeGuarantee SUL materials describe a 15% premium load on all premium payments, a monthly per-policy expense charge of $8 ($96 annually), a unit expense charge of $0.05 per $1,000 of initial specified amount monthly, surrender charges for 19 years, a $5 transaction fee per withdrawal, and a 2% net loan spread (charged 6%, credited 4%) [66]. These figures are dated and may not reflect current contracts.

Other platforms reported structural cost features without amounts. One platform reported flexible premiums with loads (guaranteed 6% up to a threshold in years 1–21+, 20% above threshold in years 1–20), ongoing monthly deductions for cost of insurance and administrative charges, a minimum face amount of $100,000, a policy value charge of 0.10% per month in years 1–20 grading down, and a $15 per month administrative charge [67]. Another reported a 25-year no-lapse minimum coverage period with an optional extension rider, but rider pricing is not publicly verified [71].

Contract terms carry lapse and guarantee conditions. Coverage can lapse if required premiums or guarantee-sustaining funding are not maintained [63]. Guarantees are conditional on contract requirements and may not apply to every named product. Surrenders, withdrawals, loans, policy changes, or reduced funding can affect values, guarantees, and death benefits. One platform reported that the guarantee option choice (Lifetime vs. Flex) is irreversible at issue [66].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Lincoln Financial best suited for in survivorship universal life estate planning?
  • Is Lincoln Financial a good fit for a high-net-worth couple needing large second-to-die coverage?

Lincoln Financial is best suited for married couples or business partners with substantial assets who want second-to-die coverage for estate tax liquidity or wealth transfer, and who are willing to work through a financial professional [72].

Specific fit profiles include couples wanting indexed universal life with growth potential and downside protection via market-linked returns; couples prioritizing variable universal life with 75+ investment options and greater market upside through AssetEdge SVUL; couples wanting guaranteed universal life survivorship with competitive lifetime guarantees and flexible payment options through LifeGuarantee SUL; and business partners needing key-person coverage or buy-sell agreement funding via a survivorship policy [76].

Buyers who value a financially established carrier with multiple survivorship UL/IUL/VUL structures are also a fit [77]. Planners who want optional cash-value or indexed growth features alongside survivorship coverage fit the indexed and variable designs [77].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Lincoln Financial for survivorship universal life estate planning?
  • Is Lincoln Financial a poor fit for buyers who want whole life survivorship or online quotes?

Lincoln Financial is probably not best suited for buyers seeking whole life survivorship insurance with guaranteed dividends and a contractual foundation. Lincoln Financial does not offer whole life or traditional universal life policies [81]. One platform noted that Lincoln recently discontinued selling standard universal life insurance but does offer a portfolio of indexed, variable, and survivorship universal life products [83].

Buyers who need direct online quotes and self-service enrollment are also a poor fit. Coverage must be purchased through a licensed financial professional; online quotes and direct purchases are not available [84]. Some applicants can qualify for coverage quickly without a medical exam, but they still work with a financial advisor [86].

Buyers in New York requiring all survivorship product lines are a poor fit, because WealthPreserve 2 SIUL form ICC22-SUL6094 is not available in New York [87]. Buyers uncomfortable with indexed crediting caps, floors, and variable interest rates who want pure guaranteed premiums and benefits are also a poor fit [89].

Buyers seeking a simple, publicly priced product or a guaranteed quote without individualized underwriting are not a fit [90]. Buyers who prioritize the highest possible guarantee regardless of cash-value features, indexed-crediting opportunity, or policy complexity are not a fit. Buyers needing coverage only during a temporary obligation rather than permanent second-death protection are not a fit.

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Lincoln Financial for a buyer who needs whole life survivorship or long-term care riders?
  • When should a buyer choose a different carrier over Lincoln Financial for survivorship estate planning?

Another option may be better in several documented scenarios. When the buyer seeks whole life survivorship insurance with guaranteed dividends and dividends-based cash value, Penn Mutual was cited as offering dividend-paying survivorship whole life [91]. When the buyer prioritizes maximum death benefit at the lowest possible cost with no cash-value accumulation needs, a GUL structure such as Lincoln LifeGuarantee SUL is suitable, but Penn Mutual and Principal were also cited as strong in pure GUL [91].

When long-term care funding is a priority, Nationwide Survivorship Indexed UL offers a Long-Term Care Rider on one or both insureds [92]. When index-linked growth with downside protection is desired, Pacific Life Horizon Survivorship IUL or Nationwide Survivorship Indexed UL were cited [93]. When lower premium loads or fee waivers for larger face amounts matter, New York Life waives administrative fees at $1M+ [94]. When a no-lapse guarantee without complexity is preferred, Pacific Life includes an automatic no-lapse guarantee rider at no charge [95].

When another carrier's current illustration shows a materially stronger contractual guarantee at the couple's ages and health profiles, that carrier is better [96]. When a fixed guaranteed survivorship UL carrier is better suited to buyers who prioritize certainty and low product complexity over indexed or variable cash-value opportunity, that structure is preferable. When a carrier with stronger large-case underwriting, higher available face amounts, or more favorable trust-owned policy terms is needed for unusually large coverage, that carrier is preferable. When a fee-based comparison across several highly rated carriers is the priority, that approach is better [96].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Lincoln Financial before signing a survivorship universal life contract?
  • Which Lincoln Financial survivorship product is currently available in the buyer's state?

Buyers should verify the exact legal insurer, policy form, product version, and state approval for the proposed survivorship policy [97]. They should confirm whether the death benefit is fully guaranteed to a stated age or duration and what exact premium schedule preserves that guarantee. They should request guaranteed and non-guaranteed values at years 10, 20, 30, and the intended second-death timing.

Buyers should request the full charge schedule: cost-of-insurance charges, premium loads, policy fees, surrender charges, rider costs, loan rates, and minimum account-value requirements [97]. They should ask how the proposed death-benefit option, guideline-premium or cash-value accumulation test, loans, withdrawals, and reduced funding affect lapse protection. They should ask what happens if one insured dies early, if the couple divorces, or if the policy is transferred to an irrevocable life-insurance trust.

Buyers should confirm whether indexed or variable allocations are necessary for the estate objective and what downside, cap, participation-rate, or investment risks apply [97]. They should ask the maximum face amount available after underwriting and whether Lincoln can support the intended estate-liquidity amount. They should request that other carriers be illustrated on identical assumptions and compare guaranteed values, carrier ratings, and premiums.

Buyers should confirm whether the recommended survivorship product is currently available in their state and for their issue class [98]. They should ask whether the product is a current active form or a legacy product reference. They should verify current indexed account crediting caps, floors, and participation rates and whether rates can change during policy life [102]. They should ask whether either insured qualifies for no-medical-exam underwriting based on age, coverage amount, and policy type [103].

Buyers should ask about advisor compensation structure and whether alternative fee-based arrangements are available. They should request specific language on whether the entire death benefit is guaranteed or only the base death benefit, with optional riders subject to performance. They should confirm policy delivery and in-force timeline and whether a 30-day free look period applies. They should ask about policy replacement and conversion options if estate-planning needs change. They should clarify the impact of the Moody's negative outlook and ask whether Lincoln expects any future rating actions [106]. They should request the company's in-force experience data or mortality claims payment statistics for large survivorship claims.

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Lincoln Financial is a good fit, with meaningful qualification, for Survivorship Universal Life Insurance for Estate and Legacy Planning. Six of seven platforms returned a usable fit assessment; five rated the fit "good" and one rated it "mixed." Five of seven platforms named Lincoln Financial during ranking discovery, with an average listed rank of 4.6 and a best listed rank of 3.

The strongest case for Lincoln Financial rests on a purpose-built survivorship product family — WealthPreserve 2 SIUL, AssetEdge SVUL, and LifeGuarantee SUL — combined with reported A-range financial-strength ratings and documented large-case capacity up to $20 million for qualifying applicants [107]. The strongest case against automatic selection rests on unverified pricing, conflicting product names and availability, a New York exclusion for WealthPreserve 2 SIUL, and a Moody's negative outlook that conflicts with Lincoln's own stable-outlook reporting [111].

Lincoln Financial should be shortlisted rather than selected automatically. The buyer must verify the current state-specific contract, guarantee duration, funding requirements, charges, face-amount capacity, and comparative illustration against other highly rated carriers before committing.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes fit assessments from seven AI platforms asked to recommend life insurance carriers for a married couple or two insured individuals seeking survivorship or second-to-die universal life insurance for estate liquidity, inheritance, legacy, or related long-term planning. The research date is 2026-09-21.

Five platforms named Lincoln Financial during the ranking stage: deepseek, google, grok, kimi, and openai. Six platforms returned a usable fit assessment. Platform fit ratings were: anthropic good, deepseek good, grok good, kimi mixed, openai good, perplexity good.

Platform research dates differ from the authoritative run date. Deepseek reported a research date of 2026-06-01; all other platforms reported 2026-09-21. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Methodology Limitations

Six of seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment; the fit findings are not unanimous. Platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.

Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing. Buyers should treat product naming, availability, and guarantees as unverified until confirmed against a current state-specific illustration and policy form.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. Deepseek operated without search enabled.

Several platform-reported product claims could not be confirmed against current Lincoln public materials, including the current nationwide availability and exact contract forms for Lincoln LifeElements SUL and Lincoln AssetEdge SUL. One platform's verified LifeGuarantee SUL materials date to 2011 and may not reflect current contracts.

No platform verified buyer-specific pricing for any Lincoln survivorship product. Pricing confidence is low across all platforms. State approval, issue-age limits, underwriting rules, rider availability, and contract charges remain unclear without a state-specific illustration and proposal.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence113 records
    1. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-6-1
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-41-3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-5-3
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-3-9-10
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-11-1-3
    12. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    13. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    14. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    15. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-13-4
    17. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-20-3-4
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-40-1
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-20-1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-44-1-6
    24. AI research evidence record kimi:lincoln-sul-2011
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    27. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    29. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    30. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-18-5-6
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-3-1-2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    34. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-28-1
    37. AI research evidence record kimi:lincoln-sul-2011
    38. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    39. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    40. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    43. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    44. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    45. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    46. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-30-2
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-11-4
    49. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    50. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    51. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-22-10
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-11-4
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-40-4
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-42-3
    59. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-43-6-8
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-3-7-8
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    63. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-3-9-10
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    66. AI research evidence record kimi:lincoln-sul-2011
    67. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    68. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    69. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    70. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    71. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-3-9-10
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-11-1-3
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-20-3-4
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-44-1-6
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-40-1
    77. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    78. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    79. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    80. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-2-10
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-37-5
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-21-4
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-6
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-39-4
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-37-6-9
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-11-4
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-43-6-8
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-41-3
    92. AI research evidence record kimi:nationwide-siul
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:pacific-life-horizon-iul
    94. AI research evidence record kimi:ny-life-sul
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:pacific-life-vul
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    98. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    99. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    100. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    101. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-43-6-8
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-6
    104. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-37-6-9
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-39-4
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-30-2
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    108. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    109. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    110. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-28-1
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-11-4
    112. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-30-2
    113. AI research evidence record perplexity:c8

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 21, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
41
Ranking mentions
5 of 7
Platform share
71%
Final consensus rank
#4

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

22 independent · 18 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

39 direct · 2 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

c4f5ea8b94f8bce7577634d859e46f9590b547455a18e83c05c49ad8a489602f