Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Foresters Financial Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance Fit Review

Foresters Financial is a mixed fit for a buyer seeking Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance with a strong lifetime no-lapse guarantee.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Foresters Financial is a mixed fit for a buyer seeking Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance with a strong lifetime no-lapse guarantee. Three of seven platforms named Foresters Financial during the ranking stage (anthropic, deepseek, kimi), a 42.9% share of included platform responses, at an average listed rank of 8.3 and a best listed rank of 7. The strongest reason to consider it is Foresters Life Insurance Company's A (Excellent), stable AM Best financial-strength rating, independently listed and affirmed October 10, 2025 [1]. The main limitation is that the reviewed evidence documents only a 10-year no-lapse guarantee on SMART Universal Life, not the lifetime guarantee this buyer prioritizes, and no dedicated current Foresters GUL product was confirmed [2].

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank8.3
Best listed rank7 (kimi)
Relevant product/model/planForesters SMART Universal Life; a separately named Foresters Guaranteed Universal Life product was not confirmed in the reviewed sources
Overall use-case fitGood (1 platform); Mixed (3 platforms); Weak (1 platform); Uncertain (2 platforms) — 7 platforms analyzed
Research date2026-09-20

Why Foresters Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Foresters Financial a good choice for Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance with a lifetime no-lapse guarantee?
  • Why did only three of seven AI platforms name Foresters Financial for guaranteed universal life insurance?

Foresters Financial qualified because three of the seven included platforms named it during ranking discovery, clearing the two-mention threshold, even though it did not reach the finalist group. Its qualifying strength is carrier stability: Foresters life insurance Company holds an A (Excellent) financial-strength rating with a stable outlook, affirmed October 10, 2025, according to AM Best's independent rating disclosure [4]. Foresters' own financial-strength page reports the same A (Excellent) rating and stable outlook, plus a 623% U.S. RBC ratio that was not independently verified in the reviewed sources [5].

The qualification is narrow. Foresters was named by anthropic (rank 8), deepseek (rank 10), and kimi (rank 7), and was not named by openai, google, grok, or perplexity during the ranking stage. Its average listed rank of 8.3 places it near the bottom of the named field. Independent reviewers describe Foresters' universal life as "adequate but not their strongest product," with the company's core strength in whole life [6]. One independent review identifies Foresters as a GUL provider that "excels in specific niches," while listing Pacific Life, Protective Life, and Penn Mutual as the top GUL carriers [7].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Foresters SMART Universal Life the same thing as a dedicated Guaranteed Universal Life policy?
  • Which Foresters Financial product should a buyer ask about if they need a lifetime no-lapse guarantee?

The product most relevant to this use case is Foresters SMART Universal Life, a flexible-premium universal life policy with a stated 10-year no-lapse guarantee [9]. A separately named current Foresters Guaranteed Universal Life product was not confirmed in the reviewed sources [9].

The guarantee mechanics matter for this buyer. Foresters states that SMART UL includes a 10-Year No Lapse Guarantee when the minimum premium is paid each month [9]. The guarantee operates if premiums paid each monthly anniversary equal the minimum premium on the issue date plus the minimum premium on subsequent anniversaries [14]. A Foresters brochure states the policy will remain in force during the first 10 policy years if the minimum monthly no-lapse premiums are paid, and that additional premium may be needed after the period ends [15]. After 10 years, the policy becomes standard universal life and is subject to lapse if cash value is insufficient to cover monthly deductions [10].

This is materially narrower than the lifetime no-lapse guarantee a dedicated GUL buyer typically expects. For comparison, Pacific Life Promise GUL documents a no-lapse guarantee to age 121, Penn Mutual Guaranteed Protection UL guarantees to age 121, Mutual of Omaha GULE guarantees to age 120, and American National Signature Guaranteed UL guarantees from age 95 to 121 [17]. No comparable Foresters GUL guarantee endpoint was located in the searched materials [13].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Foresters Financial SMART Universal Life for guaranteed universal life insurance?
  • Is Foresters Financial's AM Best rating strong enough for a lifetime death benefit guarantee?

Platforms broadly agreed on three points: the product identity, the guarantee duration, and the carrier's financial strength.

On product identity, the platforms that examined Foresters converged on SMART Universal Life as the relevant universal life offering, and none confirmed a distinct current Foresters GUL product [21]. On guarantee duration, the platforms that documented the no-lapse period all reported 10 years, not lifetime [21]. On financial strength, multiple platforms cited the A (Excellent) AM Best rating, with independent sources reporting the rating has been maintained for 25 to 27 consecutive years depending on the source's timing [28].

Agreement among AI platforms is not evidence of product quality. It reflects overlapping retrieval of the same public materials, many of which are company-owned.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does Foresters Financial offer a true Guaranteed Universal Life product with a lifetime no-lapse guarantee?
  • What is the guaranteed minimum interest rate on Foresters SMART Universal Life, and why do sources disagree?

Platform fit ratings diverged: anthropic rated Foresters a "good" fit, openai, google, and perplexity rated it "mixed," deepseek and kimi rated it "uncertain," and grok rated it "weak." The disagreement centers on whether SMART UL's 10-year guarantee qualifies as a GUL solution at all.

Four unresolved conflicts require direct verification.

Product identity. The ranking description refers to both "Foresters Guaranteed Universal Life" and SMART Universal Life, but reviewed current public Foresters materials identify SMART UL and do not confirm a separate current GUL product [32]. Deepseek reported no independent confirmation of whether SMART UL includes a no-lapse guarantee rider or is a traditional UL [33].

Guaranteed minimum interest rate. A 2018 Foresters press release states 3% annually, while agent marketing materials and other sources state 2% annually [35]. The current SMART UL page states 2% [32]. The current product page should control for current evaluation, but the applicable policy form and illustration must be verified.

Rating tenure. Some sources cite 25 consecutive years as of October 2025; others cite 27 consecutive years as of December 2025 [38]. Both are consistent with an ongoing A (Excellent) rating, but the timing is unclear.

Premium competitiveness. No public, buyer-specific premium schedule or guaranteed lifetime GUL quote was identified [32]. One source mentions term life starting at $7.79/mo, but specific GUL rates are not published [40].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What no-lapse guarantee and underwriting features does Foresters SMART Universal Life offer a guaranteed universal life insurance buyer?
  • Does Foresters Financial offer no-exam guaranteed universal life insurance, and up to what face amount?

For a buyer whose priority is a predictable lifetime death benefit, the relevant features are the guarantee, underwriting access, and policy terms.

No-lapse guarantee. 10 years, conditional on paying the required minimum premium each month [42]. A policy loan may terminate the certificate notwithstanding payment of premium [44].

Underwriting and availability. SMART UL is available for ages 0 to 85, with face amounts generally starting at $25,000 and non-medical underwriting available up to age 75, subject to underwriting and product conditions [42]. Independent sources describe no-exam GUL options for ages 16–55 with non-medical face amounts up to $400,000 for ages 16–55 and $150,000 for ages 56–75 [45]. One source reports medical underwriting limited to ages 16–70 [47]. Grok reported non-medical issue ages 0–75 and medical 0–85 [48].

Cash value. The policy includes potential cash accumulation, a stated minimum interest rate of 2% annually, withdrawals, and loans, subject to policy terms [42]. These features are secondary to this buyer's stated objective and may add complexity. A 2022 Foresters announcement cited a 4.75% UL crediting rate, which is non-guaranteed [50].

Built-in benefits. SMART UL includes at no additional cost an Accelerated Death Benefit, Common Carrier Accidental Death Benefit, Family Health Benefit Rider, and a Charity Benefit Provision that donates up to $100,000 (1% of face amount) to a designated charity when a claim is paid [51]. Optional riders available for a fee include Waiver of Monthly Deductions, Children's Term, Accidental Death, Family Health Benefit, Common Carrier Accidental Death, and Guaranteed Purchase Option [51].

Fraternal member benefits. Foresters policies include complimentary member benefits such as orphan benefits, family health benefit reimbursements, and scholarship programs at no additional premium [55]. These benefits are non-contractual, subject to benefit-specific eligibility requirements, and may be changed or cancelled without notice [57].

Geographic limits. Foresters universal life is not for use in Mississippi or Nevada [58]. One source also lists New York as unavailable [58]. Availability and features may vary by state [59].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Foresters Financial SMART Universal Life cost per month, and are there surrender charges?
  • What happens to a Foresters SMART Universal Life policy after the 10-year no-lapse guarantee ends?

No public, buyer-specific premium schedule or guaranteed lifetime GUL quote was identified for Foresters SMART Universal Life [60]. Premiums depend on age, face amount, underwriting class, state, risk factors, payment pattern, riders, and selected policy terms [60].

Known cost elements include the required minimum premium to maintain the 10-year no-lapse guarantee, monthly deductions and charges associated with universal life coverage and policy administration, potential cost-of-insurance and other charges deducted from policy value, and optional rider charges [60]. Grok reported surrender charges for 15 years and loan interest of 4% (preferred 2% after year 7), with minimum premiums varying by age, sex, and class — for example, $25 monthly for ages 16–85 non-medical base [63]. Google reported a 61-day grace period from the due date of a defaulted monthly deduction before the policy lapses, and reinstatement available within 3 years of lapse subject to evidence of insurability and payment of back premiums [64]. One source reports a minimum withdrawal amount of $500, with a maximum of the account value minus surrender charges and three months of deductions [64].

Contract terms to note: the 10-year no-lapse guarantee is conditioned on paying the required minimum premium each month [60]. After 10 years, the policy becomes standard UL and is subject to lapse if cash value is insufficient to cover monthly deductions [65]. Withdrawals and loans reduce the death benefit, and an outstanding loan balance may terminate the policy [66]. Surrender is a taxable event [66].

Pricing confidence is low across platforms. Specific policy fees, surrender charges, loan charges, withdrawal charges, and rider charges were not fully identified in the reviewed public materials [60].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Foresters Financial SMART Universal Life actually best for among guaranteed universal life insurance buyers?
  • Is Foresters Financial a good fit for a buyer who wants permanent coverage with a 10-year no-lapse guarantee?

Foresters Financial is best suited for buyers who want permanent coverage with some premium flexibility and cash-value potential, applicants for whom a 10-year no-lapse guarantee is adequate, and buyers who value Foresters Life Insurance Company's reported A (Excellent), stable AM Best financial-strength rating [68].

Additional fit profiles from the platform responses: buyers ages 16–55 seeking permanent coverage without medical underwriting [71]; consumers who value fraternal member benefits such as scholarships, legal assistance, and community grants included at no extra cost [73]; applicants who prefer a direct relationship with a financially stable, member-owned carrier [75]; and those comfortable contacting an agent rather than using online quote tools [76].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Foresters Financial for guaranteed universal life insurance?
  • Is Foresters Financial a bad choice for a buyer who needs the lowest guaranteed GUL premium?

Foresters Financial is probably not best suited for buyers whose primary requirement is a clearly documented lifetime no-lapse guarantee [78]. It is also a poor fit for buyers comparing dedicated GUL policies primarily on guaranteed death benefit and lowest guaranteed premium, since multiple expert sources identify Pacific Life, Protective Life, and Penn Mutual as premium leaders [80].

Other poor-fit profiles: buyers who need publicly available, product-specific premium illustrations before applying [78]; buyers who require online application, instant quotes, or 24/7 claims reporting [82]; applicants over age 75 or requiring high face amounts in non-medical underwriting [84]; those who require maximum cash-value accumulation as a financial tool, since Foresters' strength is in whole life, not GUL [85]; and residents of Mississippi, Nevada, or New York [86].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Foresters Financial for a buyer who needs a lifetime no-lapse guarantee to age 121?
  • When should a guaranteed universal life insurance buyer choose a different carrier than Foresters Financial?

Another option may be better when the buyer requires a lifetime no-lapse guarantee through a stated maturity age. Pacific Life Promise GUL documents a no-lapse guarantee to age 121, Penn Mutual Guaranteed Protection UL guarantees to age 121, Mutual of Omaha GULE guarantees to age 120, and American National Signature Guaranteed UL guarantees from age 95 to 121 [87].

Another option may be better when a broker's side-by-side illustrations show lower guaranteed premiums, longer guarantees, or clearer policy continuation terms [91]. Independent sources identify Pacific Life as most customizable, Protective Life as consistently lowest-premium, and Penn Mutual as offering a strong return-of-premium rider [92]. Lincoln National is cited as offering longer no-lapse guarantees with living benefit riders [92].

Another option may be better when the need is temporary and permanent lifetime coverage is not required; level term insurance may be more appropriate [91]. Buyers who prioritize maximum cash-value accumulation may find Foresters' whole life products (Advantage Plus II) more suitable than GUL [93]. Buyers who need coverage in Mississippi, Nevada, or New York must use another carrier [94].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Foresters Financial before signing a guaranteed universal life insurance contract?
  • How does a buyer verify whether Foresters SMART Universal Life premiums are competitive against dedicated GUL carriers?

The platform responses converge on a verification checklist. Buyers should confirm the exact product identity, the guarantee endpoint, the required premium, and the full charge schedule before signing.

  • Is the proposed policy actually SMART Universal Life or a distinct current Foresters GUL form [95]?
  • Does the proposed policy provide a no-lapse guarantee beyond 10 years, and through what exact age or maturity date [95]?
  • What exact monthly or annual premium is required to preserve the guarantee, and what events can terminate it [95]?
  • What are the guaranteed death benefit, guaranteed premium schedule, cash-value assumptions, surrender values, and lapse scenarios in the illustration [95]?
  • Which legal entity issues the policy in the buyer's state, and does the AM Best rating apply to that issuing entity [95]?
  • What are all monthly deductions, cost-of-insurance charges, policy fees, surrender charges, loan charges, withdrawal charges, and rider costs [95]?
  • How do loans, withdrawals, premium changes, missed payments, and changes in death-benefit option affect the guarantee [95]?
  • What is the current guaranteed minimum interest rate on SMART UL cash value — 2% or 3% annually [100]?
  • How does the guaranteed premium compare with at least three dedicated GUL alternatives using identical age, face amount, underwriting class, and guarantee period [95]?
  • Are the non-contractual fraternal member benefits guaranteed to remain available, or could they be eliminated in the future [103]?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The AI consensus is mixed, not favorable. Three of seven platforms named Foresters Financial during ranking discovery, at an average listed rank of 8.3, and platform fit ratings ranged from "good" (anthropic) to "weak" (grok), with openai, google, and perplexity landing on "mixed" and deepseek and kimi on "uncertain."

The consensus position is that Foresters Financial offers a financially strong carrier with an independently listed A (Excellent), stable AM Best rating [104], a permanent SMART Universal Life policy with a documented 10-year no-lapse guarantee [105], accessible no-exam underwriting for ages 16–55 [106], and complimentary member benefits [107]. But the reviewed evidence does not establish the lifetime no-lapse guarantee, dedicated GUL product identity, or competitive guaranteed premium that this buyer prioritizes [105].

For a buyer whose primary goal is a predictable lifetime death benefit, Foresters Financial should be considered only after obtaining and comparing a state-specific policy illustration and contract against dedicated GUL alternatives. The 10-year guarantee window is the decisive limitation.

How This Review Was Produced

This review evaluates Foresters Financial only for the Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance use case. It draws on seven platform fit-research responses collected for the study, plus the entity ranking statistics from the ranking stage. The study research date is 2026-09-20. Platform-reported research dates differ: deepseek reported 2026-01-15, while anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-21. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

All included platforms evaluated fit, but the platform-mention count of three reflects only platforms that named Foresters Financial during ranking discovery. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned citations materially outnumber independent citations in the supplied catalog, so company claims are not described here as independently verified. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. The deterministic identity audit flagged conflicting official domains and an unresolved identity, with the official website recovered by web search and verified by site identity rather than a verified domain key. One platform (deepseek) ran with search disabled, so its claims are model-reported rather than retrieved. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. The reviewed materials do not confirm a dedicated current Foresters GUL product, and the documented no-lapse period is 10 years, not lifetime. Public sources do not provide enough information to assess whether premiums are competitive against dedicated GUL carriers. Conflicting sources on the guaranteed minimum interest rate (2% vs. 3%) and on AM Best rating tenure (25 vs. 27 consecutive years) remain unresolved. State availability, product form, guarantee duration, premium requirements, and charges may vary and were not fully established from public materials. Missing research is not treated as disagreement.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

  • Signature Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance Brochure: https://choicemutual.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ANICO-GUL-Brochure.pdf
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Foresters Financial: https://news.ambest.com/
  • Foresters Life Insurance Review 2026 | Rates & Ratings: https://ogletreefinancial.com/blog/foresters-life-insurance-company-review/
  • A.M. Best Rating Disclosure Report: Foresters Life Insurance Company: https://ratings.ambest.com/DisclosurePDF.aspx?AMBNum=66847&PCA=0
  • Foresters Life Insurance Review (2026): Pros, Cons & Reviews: https://www.ethos.com/life-insurance/foresters-life-insurance-review/
  • Foresters Life Insurance Review (2026): Pros, Cons & Reviews - Ethos: https://www.ethoslife.com/life-insurance-reviews/foresters/
  • Foresters Financial Life Insurance Review 2026 Update: https://www.insuranceandestates.com/foresters-financial-life-insurance-review/
  • Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance – I&E | Whole Life & Infinite Banking Strategies: https://www.insuranceandestates.com/guaranteed-universal-life-insurance/
  • Guaranteed Universal Life Insurance (Definitive Guide: https://www.insurancebyheroes.com/guaranteed-universal-life-insurance/
  • Sell Foresters Life Insurance | Agent Tools & Resources | New Horizons: https://www.newhorizonsmktg.com/carriers/foresters
  • Sell Foresters Life Insurance | Agent Tools & Resources | New Horizons: https://www.newhorizonsmktg.com/life-insurance/foresters
  • SMART Universal Life - NIDA Marketing Group: https://www.nidagroup.com/documents/smart-ul-product-guide.pdf
  • Foresters Life Insurance Review (2026): Is It the Best Final Expense Option for Seniors? - PinnacleQuote: https://www.pinnaclequote.com/blog/foresters-life-insurance-company/
  • Foresters Life Insurance Review - Fraternal Values, Flexible Coverage - RiskQuoter.com: https://www.riskquoter.com/company-reviews/foresters/
  • Foresters Financial Reviews 2026 | Pros & Cons | InsuredBetter: https://www.trustedchoice.com/insurance-articles/c/foresters-financial-insurance-company-review/
  • Foresters Financial Life Insurance Review: https://www.usnews.com/insurance/life-insurance/foresters-life
  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-9
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-17
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record kimi:f2
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-2
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    16. AI research evidence record google:2.3.7
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:f1
    18. AI research evidence record kimi:f3
    19. AI research evidence record kimi:f4
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:f5
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-12-3
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    24. AI research evidence record grok:8
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:0
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-17-6
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-26-1
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.3.6
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    34. AI research evidence record kimi:f2
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13-1
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-11-5
    37. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-1
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-17-6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-29-9
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-2
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-4
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-2
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-6-2
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-36-1
    48. AI research evidence record grok:0
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-11-5
    50. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13-8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-31-4
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-36-2
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-44-2
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-19-4
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-42-5
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-46-5
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-3-4
    59. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-29-9
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    63. AI research evidence record grok:0
    64. AI research evidence record google:2.3.9
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-4
    67. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-6-2
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-19-4
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-42-5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-25-8
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-21-2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-28-2
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-29-9
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-28-2
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-28-3
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-36-1
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-9
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-3-4
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:f1
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:f3
    89. AI research evidence record kimi:f4
    90. AI research evidence record kimi:f5
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-9
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-3-4
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    96. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-2
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-4
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13-1
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-11-5
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-46-5
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-2
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-19-4
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:f2

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence109 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-9
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-17
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    11. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    13. AI research evidence record kimi:f2
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-2
    15. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    16. AI research evidence record google:2.3.7
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:f1
    18. AI research evidence record kimi:f3
    19. AI research evidence record kimi:f4
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:f5
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-12-3
    23. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    24. AI research evidence record grok:8
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    26. AI research evidence record grok:0
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-17-6
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-1
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-26-1
    31. AI research evidence record google:1.3.6
    32. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    34. AI research evidence record kimi:f2
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13-1
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-11-5
    37. AI research evidence record google:2.2.1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-1
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-17-6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-29-9
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-2
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-4
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-2
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-6-2
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-36-1
    48. AI research evidence record grok:0
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-11-5
    50. AI research evidence record google:1.1.9
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13-8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-31-4
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-36-2
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-44-2
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-19-4
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-42-5
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-46-5
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-3-4
    59. AI research evidence record perplexity:c13
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-29-9
    62. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    63. AI research evidence record grok:0
    64. AI research evidence record google:2.3.9
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-4
    67. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    70. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-6-2
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-19-4
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-42-5
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-25-8
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-21-2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-28-2
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-29-9
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-28-2
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-28-3
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-36-1
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-9
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-3-4
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:f1
    88. AI research evidence record kimi:f3
    89. AI research evidence record kimi:f4
    90. AI research evidence record kimi:f5
    91. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-23-9
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-3-4
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    96. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    97. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-2
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-15-4
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-13-1
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-11-5
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-16
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-46-5
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    105. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-4-2
    107. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-19-4
    108. AI research evidence record anthropic:source-1-10-2
    109. AI research evidence record kimi:f2

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
45
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#9

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

21 independent · 22 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

40 direct · 4 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

ec65f47327568632c73efa734050141c0c863fa031818c1d9c0d85a745751641