Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Corebridge Financial Term Life Insurance Fit Review for Mortgage Protection

Corebridge Financial is a good fit for a homeowner who wants ordinary individual term life insurance to protect a family from a remaining mortgage, subject to quote and contract verification.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Corebridge Financial for Term Life Insurance for Mortgage Protection: AI Consensus Fit Review

Answer Capsule

Corebridge Financial is a good fit for a homeowner who wants ordinary individual term life insurance to protect a family from a remaining mortgage, subject to quote and contract verification. Three of seven platforms named Corebridge during the ranking stage, and those three placed it at an average rank of 6.3, with one platform ranking it first. The strongest reason to consider it is Select-a-Term's unusually granular term-length menu, which lets a buyer match coverage to a mortgage payoff date rather than a standard 10-, 20-, or 30-year window. The main limitation is that no platform retrieved a dependable public premium schedule, and customer-service and complaint records are consistently described as below average.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank6.33
Best listed rank1 (google)
Relevant product/model/planCorebridge term life insurance, including Select-a-Term; ranking-stage references to AIG Value Term remain unverified
Overall use-case fitGood, subject to quote and contract verification
Research date2026-09-20

Why Corebridge Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Corebridge Financial qualify for this term life insurance for mortgage protection study?
  • How many AI platforms named Corebridge Financial for mortgage protection term life?

Corebridge Financial qualified because it met the study's minimum-mention threshold and because its product structure matches the buyer's stated preference for individually owned term coverage rather than a lender-controlled mortgage life policy. Three of the seven included platforms named Corebridge during the ranking stage: anthropic, deepseek, and google. That is a 42.9% share of included platform responses, and it cleared the two-mention minimum.

The ranking-stage placements were uneven. Google ranked Corebridge first, anthropic ranked it eighth, and deepseek ranked it tenth, producing an average listed rank of 6.33 and a final rank of 7. The ranking stage referenced three product names: AIG Value Term (10–30 years), Corebridge Term Life Insurance, and Select-a-Term. The reviewed current public materials do not conclusively establish that all three are separately available under those names in every state in 2026, so the exact product lineup is a verification item rather than a settled fact.

Qualification here reflects platform discovery, not product quality. A carrier can be named by several platforms and still carry material tradeoffs, and Corebridge does. The same platforms that credited its term flexibility also flagged customer-service and complaint concerns.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Term Life Insurance for Mortgage Protection

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Corebridge Financial product should a homeowner choose for term life insurance for mortgage protection?
  • Does Corebridge Select-a-Term let a buyer match coverage length to a remaining mortgage payoff date?

The relevant product is Corebridge term life insurance, particularly Select-a-Term. Corebridge states that Select-a-Term offers a wide range of term-duration choices and highlights flexibility in matching the term to financial needs [1]. One Corebridge page refers to 18 term periods [2], and independent sources describe those 18 durations as 10 years, single-year increments from 15 through 30 years, and 35 years [3]. That granularity is the core reason the product maps onto mortgage protection: a homeowner with 23 years left on a loan can look for a 23-year term instead of buying 30 years of coverage.

Corebridge also markets the product directly around home protection, stating that the term can be set to match the length of a mortgage [5]. The policy is ordinary individual term life issued by American General Life Insurance Company or, in New York, The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York [6]. The death benefit is paid to named beneficiaries, who can use it to repay or continue paying the mortgage. That differs from mortgage insurance or PMI, which protects the lender and is not a substitute for family-directed life insurance [7].

Two product-identification caveats matter. First, the ranking stage's "AIG Value Term (10–30 years)" label was not confirmed against a current company page, and one platform reported term lengths as 10–30 years while others reported 10–35 years [8]. Second, one platform's assessment retrieved no Corebridge term pricing or official term product page at all, leaving plan details unconfirmed from company sources [9]. Buyers should confirm the exact currently issued product name, available durations, and issuing insurer for their state before applying.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Corebridge Financial for mortgage protection term life?
  • Is Corebridge Financial considered a strong fit for term life insurance for mortgage protection?

Platforms agreed on four points, though the agreement was strong rather than unanimous on each.

Product structure fits the use case. Every platform that evaluated Corebridge described it as ordinary individual term life insurance rather than a lender-controlled mortgage policy. NAIC identifies term life insurance as appropriate for a limited period or specific financial obligation such as a mortgage [10]. Corebridge's own materials state that term life helps a family handle mortgage payments and day-to-day living expenses [11].

Term-length flexibility is the standout feature. Platforms converged on the 18-duration menu as Corebridge's differentiator for this use case. One independent review noted that a buyer needing a 23-year term to match a mortgage would find Corebridge among the only carriers that can do it [12]. Grok called the custom term lengths a precise match for mortgage durations, and google rated the carrier a "strong fit" largely on this basis.

The issuing insurers are financially established. Corebridge's ratings page lists A+ from S&P, A2 from Moody's, A from AM Best, and A+ from Fitch for American General Life Insurance Company and related insurers [14]. S&P independently reported that A+ financial-strength ratings for Corebridge's core operating subsidiaries were affirmed in July 2025 [15]. AM Best affirmed an A (Excellent) financial strength rating with a stable outlook for Corebridge members [16]. Fitch assigned a stable outlook with an A+ insurer financial strength rating [18].

Conversion rights are a genuine feature. Corebridge materials state that full conversion may be available through the level-premium period or until age 70, whichever comes first, without evidence of insurability or additional underwriting [19]. One independent directory reports that 10-year terms may convert up to month 96 and longer terms up to month 120 [22].

Agreement among platforms does not establish product quality. It establishes that the same public materials led independent evaluations to similar descriptions.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • What are the main uncertainties about Corebridge Financial term life for mortgage protection?
  • Is Corebridge Financial's financial strength rating stable in 2026?

Platforms disagreed or hedged on five material points.

Overall fit rating. Ratings ranged from "strong" (google, grok) to "good" (openai, anthropic, deepseek, perplexity) to "mixed" (kimi). Kimi's assessment noted that Corebridge does not appear in the independent 2026 mortgage protection rankings it searched, where top-ranked carriers included State Farm, Ladder, Protective, and Transamerica [23]. That is a positioning observation, not evidence of inferior coverage.

Pricing. No platform retrieved a dependable public Corebridge premium schedule. One independent review reported average annual premiums 29% cheaper than an industry average of $382 [24], and another reported Select-a-Term premiums among the lowest available, especially for longer durations and $250,000+ death benefits [25]. Grok cited a sample of roughly $278 per year for a 20-year, $500,000 policy for a healthy 35-year-old [26]. Perplexity published sample monthly rates such as $16/$18 at age 30 and $140/$200 at age 60 for the same policy shape [27]. These are sample figures from different profiles and methodologies, not a rate quote, and they should not be treated as Corebridge's price.

Rating status in 2026. This is the sharpest conflict. Corebridge's investor relations ratings page, as of April 8, 2026, shows S&P CreditWatch Negative, Moody's Stable, A.M. Best Under Review with Developing Implications, and Fitch Positive [28]. Separately, AM Best reported that Corebridge subsidiary ratings were placed under review with developing implications after the announced proposed combination with Equitable Holdings in March 2026 [29]. AM Best had also affirmed an A (Excellent) rating with a stable outlook earlier in 2026 [30]. These are not necessarily contradictory — an affirmation followed by a review after a transaction announcement is a normal sequence — but the more recent status is the one a buyer should verify.

Product naming and term lengths. The ranking stage named AIG Value Term, Corebridge Term Life Insurance, and Select-a-Term. Platforms reported term menus of 10–30 years and 10–35 years. One platform could not confirm the mapping of AIG Value Term to Select-a-Term from a company source [32]. The exact current product name and duration menu should be confirmed by state and application date.

Underwriting and speed. Corebridge describes streamlined underwriting and conditional immediate, 24-hour, or no-medical-exam policy delivery [33]. One platform reported an "Agile Underwriting+" program for no-exam coverage up to $1 million for ages 20–59 [34], while another reported that Select-a-Term requires a medical exam and that no public accelerated underwriting program was retrieved [32]. The company's own language is conditional and does not guarantee no-exam eligibility or a decision time.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does Corebridge Select-a-Term offer a homeowner protecting a mortgage?
  • Can a Corebridge term policy be converted to permanent coverage without a new medical exam?

The features most relevant to mortgage protection are term-length matching, beneficiary control, conversion rights, and living benefits.

Term-length matching. Select-a-Term's 18 durations allow coverage to end near the mortgage payoff date, avoiding payment for years the buyer may not need. Corebridge states it offers 18 term periods [35] and describes fixed level-term periods such as 10, 15, and 20 years, with pricing varying by selected period [36].

Beneficiary control. The death benefit is paid under the life policy to designated beneficiaries, who can use it to repay or continue paying the mortgage [37]. The public materials reviewed do not show that the mortgage lender must be the beneficiary, and one platform noted that a buyer should confirm named family beneficiaries and that no lender assignment is required unless voluntarily chosen [37].

Conversion rights. Corebridge materials state that full conversion may be available through the level-premium period or until age 70, whichever comes first, without evidence of insurability or additional underwriting [39]. Corebridge Direct explains that convertible term policies may permit conversion without a new medical exam, subject to the policy's conversion provisions [42]. One independent directory reports conversion windows of up to 96 months on 10-year terms and 120 months on longer terms [43].

Living benefits. Select-a-Term includes an accelerated death benefit for terminal illness automatically, according to one independent review [45]. Additional living benefit riders may be available, and one review notes they vary by state and product series [47]. Corebridge states that riders may carry a charge and are not available in all states [49].

Eligibility. Independent reviews report term applicants can apply up to age 75 [51], with another reporting issue ages 18–80 [52], and coverage amounts from $100,000 to over $1 million [53]. One review reports a minimum face amount of $100,000 [54]. These figures come from independent reviews rather than a verified company rate page.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Corebridge Financial term life insurance cost per month for mortgage protection?
  • Are there fees or cancellation penalties with a Corebridge Select-a-Term policy?

No reliable public Corebridge premium schedule was found by any platform. Premiums are individualized and depend on coverage amount, term length, age, sex, state, health, tobacco use, occupation, underwriting class, riders, and policy design [56]. Pricing confidence across platforms was low to moderate.

The available cost evidence is sample-based and inconsistent in methodology. One independent review reported average annual premiums 29% cheaper than an industry average of $382 [57]. Another reported Select-a-Term premiums among the lowest available, particularly for longer durations and $250,000+ death benefits [58]. Grok cited roughly $278 per year for a 20-year, $500,000 policy for a healthy 35-year-old [59]. Perplexity published sample monthly rates including $16/$18 at age 30 and $140/$200 at age 60 for a 20-year, $500,000 policy in excellent health [60]. Kimi found no Corebridge-specific 2026 rates and reported only general industry ranges [61].

On fees and contract terms, the evidence is thin. No specific mandatory policy fee was verified from the sources reviewed, and possible rider or policy charges must be shown in the illustration or policy documents [56]. One platform noted a policy fee is typically integrated into the annual premium structure, with amounts varying by state and policy specification [62]. Riders may carry a charge and are not available in all states [63]. One platform reported no separate application, policy, or termination fees identified in retrieved sources [65].

Contract mechanics: coverage remains in force only while required premiums are paid and policy conditions are met; at the end of the term, coverage may expire, renew at different pricing, or be convertible only according to policy provisions [56]. One platform reported the policy is cancelable at any time by stopping premium payments, without penalty [62], and another reported renewal to age 95 [59]. Free-look, lapse, reinstatement, renewal, and cancellation provisions must be verified in the issued policy.

Two contract features deserve specific attention. A standard two-year contestability period applies, and one company source states that approximately 20% of claims filed during the contestability period were rejected, dropping to 3% or less after [67]. If death by suicide occurs within two years of issue or reinstatement, only premiums paid are refunded and no death benefit is paid [68]. These are standard provisions, but they are material to a family relying on the policy to clear a mortgage.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Corebridge Financial best suited for when buying term life insurance for mortgage protection?
  • Is Corebridge a good choice for a homeowner with a non-standard mortgage payoff timeline?

Corebridge is best suited to a homeowner who wants individually owned term coverage, values precise term-length matching, and is willing to verify pricing and service expectations before committing.

The clearest fit is a homeowner whose remaining mortgage does not align to a standard 10-, 15-, 20-, or 30-year term. Select-a-Term's single-year increments from 15 through 30 years let that buyer avoid paying for coverage years beyond the payoff date [70]. A second fit is a buyer who wants the death benefit payable to named beneficiaries rather than a lender, preserving control over how proceeds are used [73]. A third is an applicant who values potential conversion to permanent coverage without new underwriting, which can matter if health changes during the term [75].

Cost-conscious buyers also appear in the fit profile. Multiple independent reviews describe Corebridge term rates as competitive or among the lowest, particularly for longer durations and larger face amounts [77]. One review notes the carrier tends to be more accessible for shoppers with pre-existing conditions [80], and another cites historically strong underwriting for diabetes and certain heart conditions [81]. Those are independent review claims, not company guarantees.

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Corebridge Financial for term life insurance for mortgage protection?
  • Is Corebridge Financial a bad choice if customer service quality matters most?

Corebridge is probably not the best fit for buyers who prioritize service responsiveness, guaranteed acceptance, or a fully self-service purchase path.

Customer service is the most consistent limitation across platforms. One independent review described Corebridge as having "below-average customer service" and a complaint record well above competitors [82]. NerdWallet reported the company draws a higher number of complaints than expected to state agencies and ranks near the bottom of J.D. Power studies [84]. One platform reported a Trustpilot score of 1.9 out of 5, with customers citing long hold times and delays [86]. Another review summarized the tradeoff as strong products and competitive pricing with below-average customer service [82].

Other exclusions: buyers who need guaranteed-issue coverage or highly predictable acceptance regardless of health, since Select-a-Term requires underwriting [88]; buyers who want a decreasing benefit synchronized to mortgage amortization, since the reviewed materials do not establish that a decreasing-term mortgage product is available; buyers who want a clearly published online price or a fully self-service purchase path, since pricing and availability are individualized and may require an agent or financial professional; and buyers who cannot accept a two-year suicide exclusion period [89].

One platform also flagged that public litigation records show Corebridge claim denials later overturned, and that contested claim investigations are documented in public cases [91]. These are individual cases, not evidence of a systemic claims problem, but they are part of the public record a careful buyer may want to weigh.

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Corebridge Financial for a buyer who needs lower premiums or better service?
  • When should a homeowner choose a different carrier over Corebridge for mortgage protection?

Another carrier may be better in five situations.

When service quality is the priority. One independent review recommends comparing with Guardian or New York Life if service quality is the top concern [94]. One platform's alternative list named Guardian, New York Life, or Lincoln Financial Group for buyers whose primary concern is customer service and responsive claims support.

When the lowest absolute premium matters more than term flexibility. One platform noted that if the buyer wants the absolute lowest premium, a quote comparison across multiple term carriers may be better, and that a conventional 20- or 30-year term from another carrier may be more competitive when the mortgage has a simple standard duration. Another platform's alternative list named Protective, Term4Sale, or Ladder based on 2026 independent rate comparisons.

When the buyer needs a term longer than 30 years. One platform identified Protective as offering 40-year terms, which Corebridge does not [95].

When the buyer wants a fully digital, instant-decision purchase. One platform noted that buyers seeking a fully digital, instant-decision online buying experience without speaking to an agent may prefer another carrier, and another named Ladder as specializing in adjustable digital coverage.

When the buyer wants decreasing coverage tied to the loan balance. A carrier offering decreasing-term coverage may be more precise for a buyer who wants the benefit to track a declining mortgage balance and does not need broader income-replacement protection.

A different carrier may also be preferable when a competing quote is materially lower for the same face amount, term, underwriting class, and conversion rights, or when the buyer has complex health, hazardous occupation, or unusual financial circumstances that an independent broker can place across a broader multi-carrier market.

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Corebridge Financial before signing a term life contract?
  • How can a homeowner verify Corebridge's current ratings and product lineup before buying?

The following items should be confirmed in writing before committing.

Insurer and product identity. Which legal insurer will issue the policy in the buyer's state: American General Life Insurance Company or The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York [96]? Is the quoted product actually Select-a-Term, AIG Value Term, another Corebridge term form, or a successor product?

Term and premium. Is the requested 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, or 30-year term available, and is the premium level for the entire selected term? What are the exact premiums, billing charges, policy fees, rider charges, and renewal premiums after the level term?

Conversion. What is the exact conversion deadline, which permanent products are available, and are there product, state, age, or amount restrictions [97]?

Beneficiaries. Can the buyer name family members as beneficiaries without assigning the policy to the mortgage lender [100]?

Exclusions and underwriting. Are there exclusions, contestability provisions, suicide provisions, aviation or hazardous-activity provisions, or other limitations relevant to the applicant [102]? Will underwriting require an exam, labs, medical records, or an attending-physician statement?

Rating status. How would a proposed Corebridge–Equitable transaction affect policy servicing, insurer ratings, claims administration, or conversion rights [104]? The January 2026 A (Excellent) affirmation and the April 2026 investor relations page showing S&P CreditWatch Negative and A.M. Best "Under Review" should be reconciled [106].

Coverage amount. Does the coverage amount account for mortgage principal, lost income, taxes, education, final expenses, and other survivor needs rather than only the current loan balance?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Corebridge Financial is a good fit for Term Life Insurance for Mortgage Protection, subject to quote and contract verification. Three of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, and the fit ratings across all seven ranged from strong to mixed, with most landing on good. The strongest case for Corebridge is Select-a-Term's 18-duration menu, which lets a homeowner match coverage to a mortgage payoff date more precisely than standard term windows allow. The issuing insurers carry strong financial-strength ratings, and conversion rights without new underwriting add flexibility.

The limitations are real and should not be minimized. No platform retrieved a dependable public premium schedule, so affordability cannot be assessed without an individualized quote. Customer-service and complaint records are consistently described as below average across independent reviews. The exact current product lineup is not fully clear, with AIG Value Term, Corebridge Term Life Insurance, and Select-a-Term referenced interchangeably. And the 2026 proposed Corebridge–Equitable transaction creates uncertainty about future branding, administration, and rating outlooks.

A buyer should obtain a written Corebridge quote and compare it against at least two other financially strong carriers for the same face amount, term, and underwriting class before deciding. Corebridge becomes more compelling when its Select-a-Term precisely matches an unusual mortgage duration or when a competing quote does not beat it on price for equivalent coverage.

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes responses from seven AI platforms that were asked which life insurance carriers they would recommend for a homeowner who wants term life insurance primarily to protect a family from a large remaining mortgage, prefers ordinary individual term coverage over a lender-controlled mortgage life policy, and wants affordable coverage with an appropriate term length from a financially established carrier. Three of the seven platforms named Corebridge Financial during the ranking stage: anthropic, deepseek, and google. All seven platforms produced fit-research responses that were used in the analysis.

The report evaluates Corebridge Financial only for the term life insurance for mortgage protection use case. It is not a broad company review. Platform-reported claims are cited with their supplied citation IDs. Company-owned sources are distinguished from independent sources throughout. No personal testing, customer experience, or independent verification was performed.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-20: anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-21, while deepseek reported 2026-04-25. These dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. One platform (deepseek) ran without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

The deterministic identity audit noted that official-site retrieval failed for one or more mentions, that one or more fetched domains were not corroborated by brand name or site identity metadata and were not used as official identity signals, and that company-name variants were collapsed onto one canonical brand before minimum-mention qualification. Official-page excerpts retrieved during the audit were marked retrieved-not-verified and contained no usable excerpt content.

Platform mentions count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery; all included platforms evaluated fit. Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing. Where evidence was mixed or incomplete, this review says so.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence106 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    3. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-2
    5. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-21
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    9. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    11. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-3
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-5
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-6
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-3
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-4
    18. AI research evidence record google:1.1.7
    19. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    21. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-3
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    23. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-11
    26. AI research evidence record grok:5
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-2
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-3
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-4
    32. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    33. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    34. AI research evidence record grok:0
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-3
    42. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-3
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-3
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-17
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:33-11
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:33-12
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-2
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-6
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-24
    52. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-16
    54. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    58. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-11
    59. AI research evidence record grok:5
    60. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    61. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    62. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-2
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:31-6
    65. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    66. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-3
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-1
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
    70. AI research evidence record google:1.2.5
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-2
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-5
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-8
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:18-11
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-9
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-2
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-7
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-10
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-7
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-5
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-6
    86. AI research evidence record google:1.1.8
    87. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    88. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-1
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:40-1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:42-2
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:42-13
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:43-1
    94. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-12
    95. AI research evidence record kimi:c2
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-21
    97. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    98. AI research evidence record anthropic:9-2
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-1
    100. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:38-12
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:39-1
    104. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    105. AI research evidence record anthropic:21-2
    106. AI research evidence record anthropic:19-3

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
55
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#7

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

37 independent · 16 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

49 direct · 6 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

5daef645aa33d44944d0a1a0d13297890ad720ff0e3cbd10bf5f36b97fa527e1