Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Haven Life Accelerated Underwriting Term Life Insurance Fit Review

Haven Life is a weak fit for a 2026 buyer seeking Accelerated Underwriting Term Life Insurance.

Research: 2026-09-207 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Haven Life is a weak fit for a 2026 buyer seeking Accelerated Underwriting Term Life Insurance. Four of seven platforms named Haven Life during the ranking stage, and the strongest reason to consider it is historical: Haven Term's InstantTerm pathway once offered algorithmic, no-exam decisions for qualified applicants up to age 59 and $1 million in coverage, backed by MassMutual. The main limitation is decisive — Haven Life stopped accepting new applications on January 12, 2024, and ceased issuing new policies by March 31, 2024. Existing policyholders retain coverage serviced by MassMutual, but new buyers cannot purchase Haven Term or Haven Simple in 2026.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage4 of 7 platforms (deepseek, kimi, openai, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses57.1%
Average listed rank4.75
Best listed rank1 (deepseek)
Relevant product/model/planHaven Term, including the former InstantTerm accelerated-underwriting pathway and Haven Simple simplified-issue coverage
Overall use-case fitWeak — closed to new business
Research date2026-09-20

Why Haven Life Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Haven Life a good choice for accelerated underwriting term life insurance in 2026?
  • Why did AI platforms include Haven Life in a ranking of accelerated underwriting term life carriers?

Haven Life qualified because four platforms named it during ranking discovery, but qualification reflects historical relevance rather than current availability. Deepseek ranked it first, openai and perplexity ranked it fourth, and kimi ranked it tenth [1]. The topic prompt asked which carriers suit a healthy consumer seeking accelerated underwriting without a conventional medical exam, and Haven Life's legacy InstantTerm product matched that description closely enough that platforms surfaced it despite its closure.

The qualification is not a quality endorsement. Platforms that named Haven Life generally did so while noting that it no longer sells new policies. Google, grok, and anthropic also evaluated Haven Life's fit but did not name it in the ranking stage, so the 4-of-7 mention count understates how many platforms actually assessed the carrier. The deterministic identity audit collapsed company-name variants onto one canonical brand before minimum-mentions qualification, and official-site retrieval for havenlife.com failed with an HTTP 403, so no verified official-page excerpt was available for this study.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Accelerated Underwriting Term Life Insurance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Haven Life product was designed for accelerated underwriting term life insurance?
  • How much no-exam coverage did Haven Term's InstantTerm pathway allow for qualified applicants?

The relevant product is Haven Term, specifically its former InstantTerm accelerated-underwriting pathway, with Haven Simple as a separate simplified-issue alternative. InstantTerm was Haven Life's algorithmic underwriting process, providing immediate coverage for qualified applicants up to age 59 seeking up to $1 million without a medical exam [5]. Applicants who did not meet the algorithm's criteria were routed to traditional MassMutual underwriting, which could require a paramedical exam and a four-to-six-week timeline [6].

Haven Term itself offered coverage from $100,000 to $3 million with term lengths of 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years [8]. Haven Simple was a 100% no-medical-exam simplified-issue product, but company materials described it as providing up to $500,000 of coverage, while an independent historical summary reported up to $1 million — a conflict that should be resolved against the applicable policy form and state limit [10]. Haven Simple premiums were substantially higher per dollar of coverage than Haven Term, often three to five times the rate for the same coverage [12].

Haven Life Plus was a rider available to eligible Haven Term policyholders, offering third-party benefits such as will creation and a fitness program at no additional policy charge, with state exclusions [13]. None of these products can be purchased new in 2026.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • Did all AI platforms agree that Haven Life is closed to new accelerated underwriting applications?
  • What did AI platforms agree about Haven Life's historical InstantTerm no-exam process?

Platforms agreed unanimously on the central fact: Haven Life is closed to new business. Independent reporting states that new applications stopped on January 12, 2024, and new policy issuance ended by March 31, 2024, with existing policies serviced by MassMutual [16]. MassMutual announced in late 2023 that it would wind down Haven Life operations [20]. Existing policies remain in force and are administered by MassMutual, which carries AM Best's A++ (Superior) rating [22].

Platforms also agreed on the historical shape of the product. Multiple platforms described InstantTerm as an algorithmic pathway that could deliver a decision in minutes for qualified healthy applicants, with no medical exam required up to age 59 and $1 million in coverage [24]. Platforms agreed that Haven Term policies were fully underwritten and issued or backed by MassMutual entities, and that MassMutual's underwriting includes both traditional and algorithmic methods, with MassExpress designed to evaluate some applicants without physical exams or labs [28].

Agreement here reflects consistent reporting about a closed product, not evidence of current product quality. No platform claimed Haven Life is currently accepting applications.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Did AI platforms disagree about whether Haven Life is still a good fit for accelerated underwriting term life insurance?
  • What is uncertain about Haven Life's historical no-exam coverage limits and eligibility?

Fit ratings diverged sharply. Perplexity rated Haven Life a "good" fit, describing it as suitable for healthy U.S. buyers who want a fast digital application and may qualify for InstantTerm [31]. Deepseek and kimi rated it "mixed," emphasizing that accelerated underwriting eligibility was never guaranteed and that product availability was unclear [32]. Anthropic, google, grok, and openai rated it "weak," citing the closure to new business [34]. The perplexity rating appears to rest on historical product descriptions rather than current availability, and it conflicts with the closure facts the other platforms reported.

Coverage limits were also disputed. Haven's historical materials described Haven Simple as offering up to $500,000 without an exam, while an independent summary reported up to $1 million [38]. One platform reported Haven Simple limits as low as $25,000 in some references [40]. Historical sources also described different Haven Term age and coverage eligibility ranges, which may reflect different product versions, underwriting rules, or publication dates [37]. No current Haven new-business pricing, application workflow, state availability, or contract issuance process could be verified.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What accelerated underwriting features did Haven Term offer before it closed to new applicants?
  • How fast was Haven Life's digital application and decision process for no-exam coverage?

Haven Term's historical feature set matched the accelerated underwriting use case well. The entire application process occurred online unless a medical exam was requested, and applicants could complete it in as little as 20 minutes, with decisions rendered in minutes for eligible applicants [41]. Historical company materials described an online application taking approximately 15 minutes before approval or a request for additional information [44]. InstantTerm could provide binding approval in under 10 minutes for healthy applicants under 60, while applicants flagged for medical complexity faced traditional underwriting with a potential paramedical exam taking four to six weeks [45].

Haven Life also offered temporary life insurance coverage to some applicants while they waited for medical exam results, providing continuity during the full underwriting process [46]. Coverage reached up to $3 million with term lengths of 10 to 30 years, higher than many direct-to-consumer competitors [47]. Rider options were limited compared with traditional carriers — no child term riders, accidental death and dismemberment riders, chronic illness riders, or return of premium options [49].

Geographic and eligibility limits applied. Haven Simple was not available in California, Denver, South Dakota, North Dakota, or New York, and InstantTerm was not available to non-U.S. citizens, though some visa holders could access Haven Term with restrictions to $1 million coverage requiring a medical exam [50]. All of these capabilities are historical and should not be treated as currently available through Haven Life.

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much did Haven Term cost per month, and what policy fees applied?
  • Are there any current Haven Life premiums or setup fees a 2026 buyer can pay?

No current Haven Life quote or new-business price exists because Haven Life no longer accepts new applications [52]. Historical premiums were individualized and are not reliable as 2026 purchase quotes. A historical Haven sample policy disclosed a $6 monthly policy fee, but its applicability to every policy or jurisdiction should be verified from the actual policy form [54]. Historical company materials stated that medically underwritten Haven Term was generally less expensive than Haven Simple simplified-issue coverage for comparable applicants [55].

Historical example rates reported by platforms included approximately $18.50 per month for a 35-year-old woman buying a 20-year, $500,000 term policy, and approximately $58.50 per month for a 47-year-old man buying the same coverage [56]. Another platform reported a published example of $17.50 per month for a 35-year-old woman buying $500,000 for 20 years [57]. Grok reported historical quotes of about $14.99 per month for $250,000 of 20-year Haven Term coverage and $10.68 per month for $250,000 of 15-year coverage for a 35-year-old male [58]. These figures are historical, platform-reported, and not independently verified.

Contract terms for existing policies are governed by the issued policy rather than current Haven marketing pages. Historical materials described level premiums guaranteed throughout the initial term, guaranteed renewability until age 65 with annual renewal after the initial term at increased rates, and a 10-day no-obligation free-look period in certain states [56]. New applicants cannot currently enter a Haven Term or Haven Simple contract.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Haven Life actually still a good fit for in 2026?
  • Should an existing Haven Life policyholder keep coverage or replace it?

Haven Life is best suited for existing policyholders, not new buyers. The clearest fit is an existing Haven Life policyholder who needs policy servicing through MassMutual, since existing policies remain in force with premiums, death benefits, and original terms unchanged and are administered directly by MassMutual [59]. Existing policyholders retain coverage backed by MassMutual's A++ financial strength rating and should not rush to replace coverage [61].

A second narrow fit is historical comparison. A buyer researching accelerated underwriting benchmarks can study what Haven Term's InstantTerm pathway offered — algorithmic decisions in minutes, no medical exams for qualified applicants up to age 59, competitive premiums, $1 million to $3 million coverage, and a fully digital application — to evaluate remaining competitors [62]. A third fit is a consumer willing to consider MassMutual or another currently active carrier with a comparable underwriting process [65].

No new applicant fits this product in 2026. The buyer cannot currently obtain a new Haven quote or complete the former digital application pathway.

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Haven Life for accelerated underwriting term life insurance?
  • Why can't a healthy 2026 buyer apply for Haven Term or Haven Simple?

Haven Life is not suited for any consumer seeking to submit a new Haven Term or Haven Simple application in 2026 [66]. A buyer requiring a currently available online application, quote, and accelerated-underwriting decision should look elsewhere, because Haven Life stopped accepting new applications on January 12, 2024, and ceased issuing new policies by March 31, 2024 [66].

It is also a poor fit for a buyer comparing current premiums and contract terms across active insurers, since no current Haven new-business pricing can be verified [66]. Buyers who need a guaranteed no-exam process regardless of health profile, applicants wanting more than $1 million without a medical exam, and people outside the historical age, state, or product eligibility limits were already outside InstantTerm's scope before closure [70]. Applicants with complex health histories who might be declined by an algorithm, and buyers who want agent guidance or face-to-face meetings, were also weaker matches for Haven Life's fully digital model [72].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Haven Life for a buyer who needs new accelerated underwriting term life coverage in 2026?
  • Which carrier should a buyer choose if they need more than $1 million without a medical exam?

Another option is better in essentially every new-purchase scenario. Platforms recommended comparing active carriers such as Ethos, Ladder, Bestow, or Banner/Legal & General America when current no-exam or accelerated-underwriting availability, coverage limits, and pricing are the primary decision factors, with exact eligibility and rates requiring current quotes [74]. Other platforms named Ladder, Bestow, or PolicyGenius as active online-first alternatives, and Ethos, Fabric by Gerber, or Banner Life as active digital-first options [75].

Buyers who need more than $1 million without an exam should look beyond Haven Life's historical cap, since InstantTerm was limited to $1 million and Haven Simple to $500,000 in company materials [77]. Buyers who want multiple rider options — child riders, accidental death, chronic illness, or return of premium — should consider traditional carriers such as Northwestern Mutual, New York Life, or Principal, because Haven Life did not offer those riders [79]. Buyers in New York should note that Haven Life was never available there and should evaluate MassMutual direct or other major carriers [80]. Buyers who need permanent insurance, cash value, or conversion options should look to whole life, universal life, or variable universal life products available through MassMutual direct or other carriers, since Haven Life was term-only [79].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Haven Life or MassMutual before signing any contract?
  • How can an existing Haven Life policyholder verify coverage and servicing details?

Any buyer should first confirm whether any Haven-branded product is currently accepting new applications in their state, since all research indicates Haven Life stopped accepting applications on January 12, 2024 [81]. If not, the buyer should identify which MassMutual product or active carrier provides the closest current equivalent to Haven Term's accelerated-underwriting pathway [81].

For any alternative carrier, verify the current no-exam eligibility rules, maximum face amount, age limits, term lengths, and states served, and ask whether the application will use prescription, medical-record, claims, or consumer-reporting data and under what circumstances an exam or labs will be required [81]. Confirm the guaranteed premium, policy fee, renewal schedule, conversion provision, and any rider cost under the actual policy form, and identify which insurer legally issues the policy along with its current financial-strength and complaint information [83].

Existing Haven Life policyholders should confirm their policy number, issue date, and remaining renewal windows, and verify that coverage remains in force and that claims administration and premium payment channels under MassMutual servicing have not changed [85]. Policyholders considering replacement should verify their current death benefit, term length, and remaining term expiration date, and check conversion deadlines before the term expires, since conversion rights may be time-limited [84]. They should also confirm whether the policy has non-forfeiture options such as paid-up term or extended term if they need to adjust coverage [84].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

The consensus verdict is that Haven Life is a weak fit for accelerated underwriting term life insurance in 2026. Four of seven platforms named it during ranking, but the platforms that examined current availability — anthropic, google, grok, and openai — all rated it weak because it stopped accepting new applications on January 12, 2024, and ceased issuing new policies by March 31, 2024 [87]. Perplexity's "good" rating and the "mixed" ratings from deepseek and kimi rest on historical product descriptions rather than current availability, and they conflict with the closure facts.

Haven Life historically matched this use case well: InstantTerm offered algorithmic no-exam decisions for qualified applicants up to age 59 and $1 million, Haven Term reached $3 million with terms up to 30 years, and MassMutual provided A++ financial backing [91]. That history makes Haven Life a useful benchmark, not a purchase option. Existing policyholders retain coverage serviced by MassMutual and should not rush to replace it. New buyers should compare currently active insurers for a new application.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from seven AI platform responses collected for the 2026-09-20 research run on accelerated underwriting term life insurance. Each platform evaluated Haven Life's fit for a healthy consumer seeking term coverage through an accelerated underwriting process without a conventional medical exam. Four platforms named Haven Life during ranking discovery, and all seven supplied fit assessments, use-case findings, pricing notes, and verification questions.

Platform responses were treated as platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Citation IDs in this article map to the supplied source catalog, and every factual claim is attributed to a platform citation or labeled as platform-reported. The consensus index for this category is available at Accelerated Underwriting Term Life Insurance, and the broader life insurance directory covers related categories.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-20: deepseek reported 2026-06-09, while anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-21. These dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness. Deepseek's response was generated with search disabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

Official-site retrieval for havenlife.com failed with an HTTP 403, so no verified official-page excerpt was available, and the deterministic identity audit used an exact-name fallback with an unverified domain key. The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Conflicting product names, coverage limits, and pricing were not resolved by guessing; buyers should verify them directly. No current Haven new-business pricing, application workflow, state availability, or contract issuance process could be verified, and historical descriptions should not be interpreted as evidence that Haven accepts new applications in 2026.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Haven Life Official Website – Term Life Insurance: https://havenlife.com/
  • 6 Essential Benefits of Haven Life Plus: https://havenlife.com/blog/haven-life-plus-benefits/
  • Does life insurance cover the coronavirus (COVID-19)?: https://havenlife.com/blog/life-insurance-and-coronavirus-covid-19/
  • No Medical Exam Life Insurance | Haven Life Simple: https://havenlife.com/blog/no-medical-exam-life-insurance/
  • Haven Life – InstantTerm or accelerated underwriting information: https://havenlife.com/instantterm
  • Quick Quote | Haven Life: https://havenlife.com/quick-quote
  • Estimate Your Life Insurance Policy Rate | Haven Life: https://havenlife.com/quote-tool
  • Term Life Insurance | Easy Quotes Online | Haven Life: https://havenlife.com/term-life-insurance
  • Haven Term | Buy Affordable Term Life Insurance Online | Haven Life: https://havenlife.com/term-life-insurance/haven-term
  • Term Life with Accelerated Underwriting Product Highlights: https://info.assurity.com/hubfs/Highlights_ITL_15-199.pdf?hsLang=en-us
  • Underwriting Practices - MassMutual: https://www.massmutual.com/legal/underwriting-practices
  • MassMutual Customer Account Login Portal: https://www.massmutual.com/login-list
  • Additional AI research evidence93 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    3. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    4. AI research evidence record kimi:haven-terminsurancebrokers-2026
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:3
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:4
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:7
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:10
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:20
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    19. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:23
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    22. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:24
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:2
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record grok:10
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:3
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    30. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    31. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    32. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:haven-terminsurancebrokers-2026
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    35. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    36. AI research evidence record grok:6
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:8
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:12
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:13
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:14
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:5
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:19
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:7
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:21
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:26
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:27
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c13
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:9
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    58. AI research evidence record grok:2
    59. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    60. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:24
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:12
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    69. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    70. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:4
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:12
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    76. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:21
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:26
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:9
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    86. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    88. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    89. AI research evidence record grok:6
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:15

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence93 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    3. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    4. AI research evidence record kimi:haven-terminsurancebrokers-2026
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:3
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:4
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:7
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:10
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c10
    14. AI research evidence record openai:c11
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:20
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    17. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    18. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    19. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:23
    21. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    22. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:24
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:2
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record grok:10
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:3
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    30. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    31. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    32. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    33. AI research evidence record kimi:haven-terminsurancebrokers-2026
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    35. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    36. AI research evidence record grok:6
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:8
    41. AI research evidence record anthropic:12
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:13
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:14
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c9
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:5
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:19
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    48. AI research evidence record anthropic:7
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:21
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:26
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:27
    52. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    55. AI research evidence record openai:c13
    56. AI research evidence record anthropic:9
    57. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    58. AI research evidence record grok:2
    59. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    60. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:24
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:12
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    68. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    69. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    70. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:4
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:12
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    76. AI research evidence record google:1.2.2
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    78. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:21
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:26
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c12
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:9
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    86. AI research evidence record google:1.1.4
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:22
    88. AI research evidence record google:1.1.3
    89. AI research evidence record grok:6
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:1
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:6
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:15

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 20, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
43
Ranking mentions
4 of 7
Platform share
57%
Final consensus rank
#5

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

25 independent · 17 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

35 direct · 8 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

12e556ca543b727da27e9167d23fd1eee6e91e5ced7ed62e1a36bceb8b3eae98