Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Lincoln Financial Life Insurance Fit Review for Private Pilots

Lincoln Financial is a good, but not clearly best-in-market, fit for an experienced U.S.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Lincoln Financial is a good, but not clearly best-in-market, fit for an experienced U.S. private pilot seeking term life insurance, provided the buyer verifies aviation terms in the formal offer. Five of seven platforms named Lincoln Financial during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 5.6 and a best rank of 5. The strongest reason to consider it: Lincoln's underwriting materials document aviation factors such as aircraft type, flight hours, IFR qualification, and future flying plans, and some reproduced guidelines allow preferred consideration for pilots meeting IFR or 1,000-hour criteria [1]. The main limitation: public materials do not guarantee private-pilot aviation deaths are covered without an exclusion, rating, or flat extra, and platform fit ratings ranged from "weak" to "strong" [4].

Research Snapshot

FieldValue
Platform mentions in ranking stage5 of 7 platforms
Share of included platform responses71.4%
Average listed rank5.6
Best listed rank5
Relevant product/model/planLincoln TermAccel Level Term or Lincoln LifeElements Level Term with aviation underwriting
Overall use-case fitGood, with meaningful aviation-underwriting uncertainty
Research date2026-09-22

Why Lincoln Financial Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Lincoln Financial a good choice for life insurance for private pilots who hold an IFR rating?
  • Why did AI platforms include Lincoln Financial in a private-pilot life insurance ranking?

Lincoln Financial qualified because five of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and its term products carry documented aviation underwriting rather than treating pilots as ordinary nonaviators. Lincoln's client interview materials request aviation information including aircraft type, licenses, student-pilot status, solo flight hours, expected future hours, and IFR qualification [6]. Lincoln application materials also require an aviation questionnaire when the applicant has flown or plans to fly as a pilot, student pilot, or crewmember [7].

The carrier's TermAccel and LifeElements Level Term products are the specific plans platforms tied to this use case [8]. Lincoln states these products are not available in New York, and products, riders, and features are subject to state availability [9].

Platform fit ratings were not uniform: Google rated Lincoln "strong," Grok, Kimi, and OpenAI rated it "good," DeepSeek and Perplexity rated it "mixed," and Anthropic rated it "weak." That spread is itself a finding — the case for Lincoln depends heavily on the individual pilot's profile.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Life Insurance for Private Pilots

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Lincoln Financial product should a private pilot choose: TermAccel or LifeElements Level Term?
  • How much coverage can a private pilot get through Lincoln TermAccel?

The most relevant Lincoln products are Lincoln TermAccel Level Term and Lincoln LifeElements Level Term, both term life insurance with aviation underwriting [10].

TermAccel is the streamlined option. It offers 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30-year level-premium periods, with a stated minimum face amount of $100,000 and maximum of $2.5 million [10]. After the level period, premiums increase and the policy may experience a face decrease under the stated product mechanics [10]. TermAccel uses an electronic ticket and interview process with automated underwriting and may waive laboratory work for qualifying applicants [10].

LifeElements Level Term is positioned for coverage of $250,000 and above, with dedicated large-case teams [10]. One independent review states LifeElements does not require medical exams for applicants up to age 60 applying for up to $2.5 million in coverage [15].

A critical conflict: Anthropic's response states TermAccel explicitly prohibits private aviation, citing Lincoln underwriting guidelines that say "No private aviation" for the product's preferred classification [16]. Perplexity found a third-party summary stating TermAccel does not allow private aviation in the lab-free path and that any private aviation prompts full underwriting [18]. Other platforms describe TermAccel as usable for aviation cases with possible routing to full underwriting [19]. Buyers should treat the TermAccel aviation rule as unresolved and confirm it directly.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • Do AI platforms agree that Lincoln Financial covers private pilots without an aviation exclusion?
  • What aviation factors does Lincoln Financial consider when underwriting a private pilot?

Platforms broadly agreed on four points.

Lincoln collects aviation-specific information. Lincoln's interview and application materials request aircraft type, licenses, student-pilot status, solo flight hours, expected future hours, and IFR qualification, and require an aviation questionnaire for pilot applicants [21].

Lincoln's public pages do not publish a pilot-specific rate table. Multiple platforms independently reported that no public Lincoln rate table states the aviation surcharge, flat extra, exclusion terms, or final premium for a private pilot [23].

Aviation can affect the underwriting path. Platforms agreed that private aviation can push an applicant out of streamlined or lab-free underwriting into full underwriting [27].

Pricing is quote-specific. No platform identified a reliable public private-pilot premium schedule for Lincoln [23].

Agreement here reflects what platforms found in the same public record. It does not establish that Lincoln's underwriting outcome will be favorable for any individual pilot.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Does Lincoln TermAccel accept private pilots, or does it exclude private aviation entirely?
  • Is Lincoln Financial a weak or strong fit for private pilots compared with other carriers?

The platforms disagreed on the central question: whether TermAccel accepts private pilots at all.

  • Anthropic reported that TermAccel explicitly prohibits private aviation, citing Lincoln guidelines stating "No private aviation" and "No ratable avocation or occupation" for Preferred Plus classification [31].
  • Perplexity reported that one published agent FAQ says any private aviation prompts full underwriting, while another guide says private aviation is not eligible for some no-aviation paths [33].
  • Grok reported that TermAccel supports aviation cases, with stricter guidelines in some versions requiring at least 100 solo hours or IFR and under 200 hours per year for eligibility [35].
  • Google reported that private pilots without an IFR qualification are excluded from lab-free consideration under Lincoln guidelines, implying IFR-rated pilots may remain eligible [37].

Platforms also disagreed on the aviation exclusion question. Google reported that Preferred Plus and Preferred rate classes for private pilots may require an aviation exclusion rider [38]. OpenAI found that Lincoln's foreign-national guidance expressly requires an aviation exclusion rider for all private pilots in that specific underwriting context — a rule that should not be generalized to ordinary U.S. applicants [39].

Thresholds varied across reproduced guidelines. Some sources specify IFR qualification or 1,000 total flight hours, 25–250 annual hours, U.S./Canada flying, under age 70, and a clean motor-vehicle record [40]. Google noted that different internal Lincoln marketing sheets list slightly different minimum flying-hour thresholds, with some specifying 1,000 total hours and others listing 300+ solo hours or an IFR qualification with at least 100 solo hours [44].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What aviation underwriting features does Lincoln Financial offer private pilots that other carriers may not?
  • Can a private pilot keep a preferred rate class at Lincoln Financial if a flat extra is applied?

Lincoln's most distinctive reported feature is its willingness, in some reproduced guidelines, to allow a qualified preferred rate class even when an aviation flat extra applies. Google reported that Lincoln allows Preferred rates even if the aviation risk requires a flat extra premium based on Swiss Re manual guidelines, rather than automatically downgrading the pilot to Standard rates [46]. This claim comes from a broker-hosted carrier guideline, not a Lincoln consumer page, and should be verified.

Other use-case capabilities:

  • Aviation questionnaire process. Lincoln application materials require an aviation questionnaire for pilot, student-pilot, or crewmember applicants [47].
  • Accelerated underwriting. TermAccel uses an automated, paperless Tele-App process with underwriting checks such as MVR, MIB, and Rx review [48].
  • Conversion. TermAccel is described as convertible to qualifying Lincoln permanent policies before the end of the level-premium period or before attained age 70, whichever comes first, subject to product availability [50].
  • Term duration range. 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30-year level-premium periods are available [50].
  • LifeElements capacity. Coverage of $250,000 and above with dedicated large-case teams [50].

Independent reviews describe Lincoln as one of the go-to carriers for private pilots with competitive aviation underwriting, and note that experienced pilots can sometimes avoid flat extras [54]. That characterization is platform-reported and based on broker experience rather than public data [54].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Lincoln Financial charge a private pilot per month, and what aviation flat extra applies?
  • What policy fees does Lincoln TermAccel charge, and what happens to premiums after the level term ends?

Lincoln does not publish a pilot-specific premium, flat extra, or fee schedule. Pricing for private pilots is unclear until an underwritten quote is obtained [55].

Published product-level costs (TermAccel):

  • Policy fee: $80 for face amounts of $100,000 to $249,999.99; $90 for $250,000 to $999,999.99; and $70 for $1 million to $2.5 million [56].
  • Level premiums apply only during the selected 10-, 15-, 20-, or 30-year period; premiums increase after that period under the stated policy mechanics [56].
  • The accelerated benefits rider has a one-time charge if exercised, according to Lincoln's product page [56].
  • Optional riders, including waiver of premium and children's level term, are available at additional cost where offered [56].

Aviation-related costs are not publicly specified. Any aviation rating, flat extra, or exclusion-related pricing must be confirmed in the offer [56]. Kimi reported industry ranges for major carriers — flat extras of roughly $1.50 to $5.00 per $1,000 of coverage per year, equating to $1,500 to $5,000 annually on a $1 million policy — but explicitly labeled these as industry ranges from comparable carriers or broker-consensus reporting, not Lincoln-specific rates [58]. Google reported standard flat extra fees for less experienced pilots generally range from $2.00 to $5.00 per $1,000 of face value annually [59].

Contract terms. Coverage can expire if required premiums are not paid or are insufficient to keep the policy in force; conversion is limited to qualifying Lincoln permanent policies and must occur before the stated conversion deadline; products, riders, exclusions, and terms vary by state and policy form [56]. DeepSeek noted term policies typically have a free-look period commonly of 10–30 days, though this was described generically rather than as a confirmed Lincoln term [57].

Pricing confidence was rated low by Anthropic, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Kimi, and moderate by OpenAI and Grok [60].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Lincoln Financial best suited for among private pilots?
  • Is Lincoln Financial worth it for an experienced pilot with 1,000+ hours and an IFR rating?

Lincoln is best suited for established private pilots with substantial experience, clean driving and aviation records, and either IFR qualification or high total flight hours [62]. Reproduced guidelines describe preferred consideration for pilots flying approximately 25 to 250 hours annually in the U.S. and Canada, under age 70, with a clean motor-vehicle record [65].

Other fit profiles:

  • Applicants seeking 10-, 15-, 20-, or 30-year term coverage [62].
  • Applicants who value electronic application and potentially accelerated underwriting [62].
  • Applicants needing $100,000 to $2.5 million through TermAccel, or larger coverage through LifeElements [62].
  • Pilots with complex medical histories who can access LifeElements after a TermAccel decline [70].
  • Pilots who want convertible term policies with potential transition to permanent coverage [62].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Lincoln Financial for life insurance as a private pilot?
  • Is Lincoln Financial a bad choice for student pilots or low-hour pilots?

Lincoln is probably not best suited for student pilots, inexperienced pilots, pilots with unusual aircraft or aviation activities, or applicants unable to document favorable aviation experience [73]. Pilots with fewer than 100 logged hours, aerobatic pilots, agricultural pilots, rotorcraft pilots, and experimental or amateur-built aircraft operators face the steepest pricing or broadest exclusions at major carriers including Lincoln Financial [74].

Additional poor-fit profiles:

  • Buyers requiring guaranteed inclusion of private-pilot aviation deaths without an exclusion or aviation-related premium adjustment [73].
  • Applicants in New York seeking TermAccel or LifeElements, because Lincoln states these products are not available there [75].
  • Pilots who fly more than 250 hours per year or fly internationally outside the U.S. and Canada [76].
  • Pilots who want a carrier that publicly publishes detailed aviation underwriting guidelines [78].
  • Pilots who have been declined or rated by other carriers and need simplified issue or guaranteed issue [80].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Lincoln Financial for a private pilot who wants no aviation exclusion rider?
  • When should a private pilot choose a specialty aviation carrier instead of Lincoln Financial?

Another option may be better in several specific situations.

When the buyer wants guaranteed no-aviation-exclusion coverage. AOPA Group Term Life Insurance offers no general aviation exclusions at economical group rates for members [81]. Avemco/PIC network offers pilot-friendly underwriting with no aviation exclusions or surcharges and a rapid application process [82].

When the buyer prioritizes competitive pilot pricing. Policygenius identified Banner Life (William Penn, Banner Life family) as offering the most affordable life insurance rates for private pilots, with or without exclusion riders, and did not list Lincoln Financial as top-tier for pilot pricing [83]. Prudential was identified as offering most affordable rates for private pilots with no aviation exclusion rider necessary, requiring age 30+, 1,000+ hours, and 100 hours in the current aircraft [84].

When the pilot has a high-risk profile. Specialty aviation life insurers such as Avemco or Pilot Insurance Center may offer better terms for experimental, aerobatic, agricultural, rotorcraft, or low-time pilots [85].

When the buyer wants multi-carrier comparison. Diversified Insurance Brokers compares aviation underwriting across 100+ carriers and identifies carriers best suited to specific pilot profiles [86]. Independent brokers with access to multiple carriers, including specialty aviation markets, produce better outcomes because carrier-to-carrier variation is significant — a flat extra of $5 per thousand at one carrier may be $2.50 per thousand at another for the same applicant [87].

When the buyer needs permanent coverage or coverage beyond available term periods. Term insurance does not provide cash-value accumulation and is temporary coverage [88].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a private pilot confirm with Lincoln Financial before signing a life insurance contract?
  • How can a buyer verify whether Lincoln Financial will cover pilot-at-the-controls deaths?

Before accepting any Lincoln offer, a private pilot should obtain written answers to the following, drawn from the platform verification lists [89]:

  1. Will the policy cover death while the insured is acting as pilot of a privately owned or rented aircraft?
  2. Is an aviation exclusion rider being added? If so, what exact activities and aircraft are excluded?
  3. Will the policy cover VFR and IFR flying, night flying, solo flights, tailwheel aircraft, experimental aircraft, helicopters, and aircraft used outside the United States?
  4. What aviation rating or flat extra applies, and is it guaranteed for the full level-premium period?
  5. How do pilot certificate, IFR rating, total and annual flight hours, aircraft type, ownership, purpose of flight, accident history, and motor-vehicle record affect the offer?
  6. Does the issued policy require reporting future changes in aircraft, ratings, flight hours, or aviation activities?
  7. Which product is being offered — TermAccel or LifeElements — and what are the exact face-amount, age, state, conversion, rider, and renewal terms?
  8. What is the total premium including policy fees and any aviation charge, and what happens after the level term ends?
  9. If the application is declined or issued with an exclusion, can the buyer obtain written alternatives from other carriers before accepting the offer?
  10. Does Lincoln work with any aviation-focused brokers or networks that might provide faster underwriting feedback for pilots?

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Lincoln Financial is a good, but not clearly best-in-market, fit for an experienced U.S. private pilot, with meaningful aviation-underwriting uncertainty. Five of seven platforms named it in the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 5.6 and a best rank of 5. Platform fit ratings ranged from "weak" (Anthropic) to "strong" (Google), with "good" (Grok, Kimi, OpenAI) and "mixed" (DeepSeek, Perplexity) in between — a spread that reflects genuine disagreement in the public record rather than a settled consensus.

The strongest documented case for Lincoln is its aviation-information process and reproduced guidelines allowing preferred consideration for pilots meeting IFR or 1,000-hour criteria, with some sources reporting Lincoln will keep a preferred class even when a flat extra applies [95]. The strongest documented case against is Anthropic's finding that TermAccel explicitly prohibits private aviation, plus the absence of any public pilot-specific rate table [99].

A private pilot should obtain a quote from Lincoln, confirm in writing whether TermAccel or LifeElements is being offered, and verify the aviation exclusion, rating, and flat extra terms in the formal offer before accepting. Comparing the Lincoln offer against Banner Life, Prudential, AOPA Group Term, and specialty aviation markets is warranted given the documented carrier-to-carrier variation [102].

How This Review Was Produced

This review synthesizes seven platform responses collected for the topic "Best Life Insurance for Private Pilots" with a research date of 2026-09-22. Each platform evaluated Lincoln Financial's fit for a private pilot seeking life insurance and supplied citations for its claims. Five of seven platforms named Lincoln Financial during ranking discovery; all seven evaluated fit. Fit ratings, product names, pricing details, and verification questions were extracted from the platform responses and their cited sources. No independent testing, quote generation, or underwriting was performed. The consensus index for this topic is available at Life Insurance for Private Pilots, and related carrier reviews are organized under the broader life insurance directory.

Methodology Limitations

  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. DeepSeek's response is dated 2026-05-20; all other platforms are dated 2026-09-22. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.
  • All included platforms evaluated fit, but platform_mentions counts only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.
  • Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. No-search model claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts. DeepSeek's response was produced with search disabled.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • Conflicting product names, pricing, and capabilities were not resolved by guessing. Where platforms disagreed — particularly on whether TermAccel accepts private pilots — the conflict is described and buyers are directed to verify.
  • Lincoln's current public consumer pages confirm the term products and general application process but do not publish a complete current private-pilot underwriting table [106].
  • Specific private-aviation thresholds and preferred-treatment criteria were found in third-party-hosted reproductions of Lincoln underwriting material; their current applicability should be verified directly [107].
  • Lincoln's explicit private-pilot aviation exclusion requirement was located in foreign-national guidelines and should not be generalized to all U.S. applicants [110].
  • Public materials do not disclose a standardized aviation flat extra, exclusion schedule, or final premium formula [106].
  • Agreement among AI platforms does not prove product quality or underwriting outcomes.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Avemco Term Life Insurance for Pilots: https://www.avemco.com/products/life
  • Life insurance | Brokerage Resource Center | Lincoln Financial: https://www.lincolnfinancial.com/public/microsite/brc/positionlincolnsolutions/lifeinsurance
  • Additional AI research evidence111 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    3. AI research evidence record grok:4
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    5. AI research evidence record google:2.4.3
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_termaccel
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    19. AI research evidence record grok:10
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_underwriting
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    26. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    29. AI research evidence record google:2.4.4
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    35. AI research evidence record grok:10
    36. AI research evidence record grok:11
    37. AI research evidence record google:2.4.4
    38. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    41. AI research evidence record grok:4
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    44. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    45. AI research evidence record google:2.4.7
    46. AI research evidence record google:2.4.3
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    54. AI research evidence record grok:0
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    57. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    58. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    59. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    61. AI research evidence record grok:10
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    63. AI research evidence record grok:4
    64. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    66. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    67. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    76. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    77. AI research evidence record google:2.4.7
    78. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_underwriting
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    80. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    81. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    85. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    91. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    92. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    97. AI research evidence record grok:4
    98. AI research evidence record google:2.4.3
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    104. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    108. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    109. AI research evidence record grok:4
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    111. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence111 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    3. AI research evidence record grok:4
    4. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    5. AI research evidence record google:2.4.3
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    8. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    9. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_termaccel
    13. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    19. AI research evidence record grok:10
    20. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    22. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    24. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_underwriting
    25. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    26. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    27. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    28. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    29. AI research evidence record google:2.4.4
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    34. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    35. AI research evidence record grok:10
    36. AI research evidence record grok:11
    37. AI research evidence record google:2.4.4
    38. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    39. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    40. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    41. AI research evidence record grok:4
    42. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    44. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    45. AI research evidence record google:2.4.7
    46. AI research evidence record google:2.4.3
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c6
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    54. AI research evidence record grok:0
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    57. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    58. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    59. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    61. AI research evidence record grok:10
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    63. AI research evidence record grok:4
    64. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    65. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    66. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    67. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    68. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    71. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    72. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    73. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    74. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    76. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    77. AI research evidence record google:2.4.7
    78. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_underwriting
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:c6
    80. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    81. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    85. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    88. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    91. AI research evidence record deepseek:lincoln_term
    92. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:c1
    94. AI research evidence record google:1.1.1
    95. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    96. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    97. AI research evidence record grok:4
    98. AI research evidence record google:2.4.3
    99. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    101. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    103. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    104. AI research evidence record kimi:c4
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:c3
    106. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    107. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    108. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    109. AI research evidence record grok:4
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    111. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
39
Ranking mentions
5 of 7
Platform share
71%
Final consensus rank
#5

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

19 independent · 15 company-owned · 5 unclear

Evidence support

21 direct · 16 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

0a5899550d77ca6f1ce0c51bef33c9e138fefdf3ee1ab70db5ac2636ac923174