Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Transamerica Life Insurance After a DUI Fit Review

Transamerica is a mixed fit for Life Insurance After a DUI.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Transamerica is a mixed fit for Life Insurance After a DUI. Five of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage, with an average listed rank of 4.4 and a best rank of 2. The strongest reason to consider it is that its individually underwritten Trendsetter term portfolio accepts standard and substandard (Table A–D) risk classes, so a single older DUI may produce a rated offer rather than an automatic decline [1]. The main limitation is transparency: Transamerica publishes no DUI-specific lookback period, surcharge schedule, or acceptance rule, and independent brokers do not name it as a preferred DUI carrier [3]. Expect an individualized underwriting decision, not a predictable one.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage5 of 7 platforms (anthropic, grok, kimi, openai, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses71.4%
Average listed rank4.4
Best listed rank2 (openai)
Relevant product/model/planIndividually underwritten term or permanent life insurance, especially Trendsetter Super, Trendsetter LB, and FFIUL
Overall use-case fitMixed
Research date2026-09-22

Why Transamerica Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Transamerica a good choice for life insurance after a DUI?
  • Why did AI platforms include Transamerica in a DUI life insurance ranking?

Transamerica qualified because it sells the product type this buyer needs — individually underwritten term and permanent coverage — and because five of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery. It is not a DUI specialist, and no platform presented it as the single best answer.

The structural case is straightforward. Transamerica's Trendsetter term products are individually underwritten and use Standard and Smoker classes plus Table A–D substandard ratings, with one underwriting guide stating Table A–D add 25% to 100% over the standard rate [5]. That means a DUI can plausibly result in a rated offer rather than a decline. Transamerica also offers multiple term durations and a conversion path to permanent coverage, which matters to a buyer who expects their driving record to improve over time [7].

The counterweight is equally clear. Independent broker analysis states that carrier choice matters more than almost anything else in DUI cases and identifies Prudential and Nationwide — not Transamerica — as standing out for more accommodating driving-history approaches [8]. One platform's research explicitly notes Transamerica is not specifically highlighted as a preferred DUI carrier by brokers [9]. Transamerica earned its place in this study on product relevance and underwriting structure, not on demonstrated DUI accommodation.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Life Insurance After a DUI

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Transamerica plan should a buyer with a DUI history apply for first?
  • Is Transamerica Trendsetter Super available to a buyer with a recent DUI?

Trendsetter Super is the most directly relevant product, with Trendsetter LB as a secondary term option and FFIUL as a permanent alternative. All are individually underwritten, so the DUI is evaluated case by case rather than against a published eligibility rule.

Platforms converged on the same short list. Trendsetter Super and Trendsetter LB are U.S. term products with individually underwritten eligibility and standard-to-substandard risk classes [10]. Trendsetter Super is described as offering simplified underwriting with no medical exam up to $2 million for qualified applicants, with coverage up to $10 million for qualified applicants when an exam is used [12]. Trendsetter LB adds living benefit riders, typically costs more, and caps at $2 million [14].

FFIUL is described as a flexible-premium indexed universal life policy with index-account options, a guaranteed minimum interest rate, and an optional long-term-care-related rider [15]. No reviewed material establishes that FFIUL is preferable to term for a DUI applicant, and permanent-policy costs depend heavily on design and funding [15].

Two product-level conflicts need disclosure. First, Trendsetter Super is reported as unavailable in New York, which would push a New York applicant to Trendsetter LB or another carrier [14]. Second, public product pages and guides describe different Trendsetter versions and policy forms, so the exact current form must be confirmed for the applicant's state [10].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Transamerica for a DUI applicant?
  • Does Transamerica decline applicants with a DUI?

Platforms agreed on three points: Transamerica sells the right product type, it does not publish DUI-specific underwriting rules, and a single older DUI is more workable than a recent or repeated one.

First, product relevance. Every platform that named Transamerica pointed to individually underwritten term or permanent coverage — Trendsetter Term, Trendsetter Super, Trendsetter LB, or FFIUL — as the relevant path [16].

Second, underwriting opacity. Transamerica's public materials state that eligibility and premiums are subject to underwriting but do not publish a DUI lookback period, explicit treatment of multiple offenses, or a DUI-specific surcharge or decline rule [16]. One platform's research states plainly that Transamerica's specific written guidelines for DUI applicants are not available in public sources and that all available evidence is indirect [22].

Third, timing matters more than carrier marketing. Industry underwriting guidance commonly considers the type and date of driving infractions, DUI/DWI history, accidents, license status, alcohol or drug-use history, and treatment or relapse information [23]. Recent DUIs may produce 50–100% premium increases, while a single offense more than 10 years old with a clean record is disregarded by many carriers [25].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • How strict is Transamerica on a DUI compared with other life insurance carriers?
  • Does Transamerica use table ratings or flat extras for a DUI?

Platforms disagreed on how accommodating Transamerica actually is, and the disagreement is material rather than cosmetic. Fit ratings split three ways: good (deepseek, google, kimi), mixed (grok, openai, perplexity), and uncertain (anthropic).

The sharpest conflict is the underwriting timeline. One platform's research cites a structured grid: decline under 1 year since the DUI, flat extra at 1–2 years, standard-to-flat-extra at 2–4 years, and standard beyond 4 years, with multiple offenses within 4 years leading to decline [26]. Another platform's research cites a different age-and-time grid with specific flat-extra amounts — $3.50 per $1,000 of coverage annually for applicants age 36 and older with a DUI under 1 year old, and $5.00 per $1,000 for applicants aged 26–35 — plus decline for applicants under 26 with a DUI under 1 year old [28]. One platform's research explicitly flags that two public underwriting guides show different age and time grids and that the exact current internal rule set is unclear [26].

The second conflict is rating structure. One platform's research states Trendsetter Super accepts some recent DUIs at table ratings [30]. Another platform's research warns that table ratings are permanent percentage surcharges that do not automatically decrease as the DUI ages, unlike temporary flat extras used by some carriers [32]. If Transamerica applies a table rating rather than a flat extra, the long-run cost difference could be significant — but no reviewed source confirms which structure Transamerica uses for a given DUI profile.

The third conflict is competitive positioning. One platform's research states Transamerica allows qualification for best rates with no more than one major moving violation, which is more restrictive than Banner Life and ING [33]. That source is dated December 2023 and may be outdated or specific to one broker's experience [33]. Another platform's research states Transamerica offers coverage sooner than many competitors [34]. These two claims point in opposite directions and neither is confirmed by company-published DUI rules.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What coverage amounts and term lengths does Transamerica offer a buyer with a DUI?
  • Can a Transamerica term policy be converted to permanent coverage after a DUI?

The features most relevant to a DUI buyer are risk-class flexibility, term length choice, conversion rights, and the possibility of no-exam underwriting. Each carries a caveat.

Risk-class flexibility is the core advantage. Trendsetter materials show Standard and Smoker classes and Table A–D substandard ratings, indicating a DUI may produce a rated offer rather than an automatic decline [35]. The public material does not say how Transamerica would rate a specific DUI.

Term length and coverage. Trendsetter Super and Trendsetter LB offer initial level-premium periods of 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years, with premiums increasing after the initial level period [37]. Reported issue ages are 18–80, with Trendsetter Super ranging from $25,000 to $10 million or more for qualified applicants and Trendsetter LB from $25,000 to $2 million [38].

Conversion. Trendsetter Super includes a conversion option where applicable, generally without new underwriting for conversion to a permanent policy at the same or lower face amount [37]. One platform's research adds that conversion may be available without new underwriting if converted within 5 years and the policy is rated no worse than Table D, with a maximum conversion face amount of $2 million per life [40]. Conversion deadlines, policy forms, and available permanent products vary by jurisdiction and issue age [37].

No-exam pathway. Transamerica states its term life insurance includes simplified underwriting with no medical exam for qualified applicants up to $2 million [41]. Whether a DUI applicant falls inside "qualified applicants" is not confirmed. One platform's research notes DUI history may trigger paramedical exams or additional underwriting requirements, including blood and urine samples [42]. Accelerated underwriting can use external data such as prescription history and motor-vehicle records, so a driving-history flag may affect the pathway [44].

Disclosure risk. Transamerica performs post-issue audits and reserves the right to rescind policies if material information was not disclosed at application, and applicants must disclose all DUI history including expunged or sealed convictions [45]. Insurers may access full driving and criminal records during underwriting that include sealed convictions [46].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Transamerica cost per month for a buyer with a DUI history?
  • What policy fees and post-level-period costs apply to a Transamerica Trendsetter policy?

No dependable DUI-specific premium exists in the reviewed evidence. Transamerica's quote tools expressly describe quotes as estimates subject to underwriting, with premiums varying by health history, underwriting status, age, body measurements, sex, and coverage preferences [47]. Pricing confidence across platforms is low, except for one platform that reports a structured flat-extra grid with high confidence [48].

What is documented:

  • Trendsetter Super published policy fee: $60 annually for face amounts under $100,000 and $30 annually for face amounts of $100,000 or more, subject to product and jurisdiction [49].
  • Trendsetter term premiums are level only during the selected initial guarantee period and increase afterward [50].
  • Payment-mode factors can increase the effective annual cost when paying more frequently [49].
  • Riders may carry additional costs or may not be available in every jurisdiction [50].
  • FFIUL costs are policy-specific and may include premium requirements, cost-of-insurance charges, policy expenses, and rider charges; exact amounts were not verified from reviewed public material [51].

Platform-reported DUI cost estimates conflict. One platform reports temporary flat extras of $3.50–$5.00 per $1,000 of coverage annually for recent DUIs, with standard rates possible after 5 years [48]. Another reports that table ratings for recent DUIs are permanent surcharges that do not decrease over time [52]. Industry-wide estimates cited by platforms include 50–100% premium increases for DUIs under 2 years old and rates up to 200% higher for DUI convictions [53]. These are general market figures, not Transamerica-specific rates.

Sample pricing for healthy applicants — approximately $37–$46 per month for $500,000 of term coverage in 2026 review data — does not apply to a DUI applicant and should not be used as a planning figure [55].

Contract terms to verify: the suicide limitation generally applies during the first two policy years in most states, and exact lapse, surrender, nonforfeiture, and cancellation consequences must be reviewed in the policy contract [50]. Term policies can be cancelled by stopping premium payments without surrender penalties, while permanent policies such as FFIUL may carry surrender charges if cancelled early [48].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Transamerica best suited for among buyers with a DUI history?
  • Is Transamerica worth it for a single DUI that happened several years ago?

Transamerica is best suited to a buyer with one older, isolated DUI, an otherwise favorable health and driving record, and a need for conventional term coverage. It is a comparison candidate, not a standalone recommendation.

The profile that fits best:

  • Applicants with one older DUI, otherwise favorable health and driving history, who need conventional term coverage [56].
  • Applicants who want guaranteed initial level premiums for 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years [56].
  • Applicants who may value conversion from term to permanent insurance without new underwriting, where the applicable policy and jurisdiction allow it [56].
  • Applicants with a single DUI that occurred 5 or more years ago with no subsequent violations and a clean current driving record [57].
  • Applicants with multiple concurrent health conditions, where independent agents report Transamerica is more flexible than most carriers — though no evidence confirms this flexibility extends to DUI [59].
  • Applicants who will compare Transamerica against many carriers through an independent agent or quote marketplace rather than applying direct [60].

The recurring qualifier across platforms is that Transamerica works best as one submission among several, not as the only application. One platform's research recommends submitting for informal underwriting alongside several competing carriers, especially when the DUI is old and isolated [56].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Transamerica for life insurance after a DUI?
  • Is Transamerica a bad choice for a recent or multiple DUI?

Transamerica is probably not the best choice for buyers with a recent DUI, multiple offenses, a suspended license, or unresolved alcohol or substance-use concerns. It is also a poor fit for anyone who needs guaranteed acceptance or a published DUI rule before applying.

Platforms consistently flagged these exclusions:

  • Applicants seeking a guaranteed acceptance or explicitly DUI-specialized product [61].
  • Applicants with a recent DUI, multiple DUIs, a suspended license, or documented alcohol or substance-use concerns until a broker confirms likely eligibility [61].
  • Applicants with a DUI within the past 12 months, where postponement or denial risk is high [62].
  • Applicants with multiple DUI convictions or repeat offenses, which are industry-standard grounds for decline [62].
  • Applicants who need the fastest underwriting decision, since fully underwritten cases run 4–7 weeks [64].
  • Applicants seeking the lowest premium for an otherwise clean driving history, since independent brokers report Transamerica is typically not the cheapest for perfectly healthy applicants [62].
  • Applicants under age 26 with a DUI less than 1 year old, reported as an automatic decline in one underwriting grid [65].
  • Applicants who need certainty about acceptance before applying and cannot tolerate a rated or declined decision [66].

One platform's research adds that Transamerica's Final Expense Solutions products ask about DUI, DWI, or reckless driving convictions within the past 2 years, and answering yes disqualifies the applicant from standard immediate benefit rates [67]. That is a separate product line from Trendsetter term, but it matters if a buyer is routed to final expense after a term decline.

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Transamerica for a buyer with a recent DUI?
  • When should a buyer with multiple DUIs skip Transamerica entirely?

Another carrier is likely better when the DUI is recent, when there are multiple offenses, when the buyer needs guaranteed issue, or when the buyer wants a carrier with published DUI rules.

Platform-reported alternatives by scenario:

  • Recent DUI within 12 months: Prudential and Nationwide are identified as more accommodating on driving history, with Prudential described as one of the strongest options for DUI applicants [69].
  • DUI within 2–3 years: Prudential or Banner Life [70].
  • Two DUIs: Prudential or North American after 5 or more years [70].
  • DUI 3 or more years old: Protective, Banner, or Principal may offer better value; Protective reportedly requires a 36-month wait but applies gentler Table A–B ratings afterward [71].
  • Faster underwriting: Banner and Lincoln Financial are cited as consistently faster [71].
  • Guaranteed issue or simplified issue when conventional underwriting is unavailable: consider guaranteed-issue coverage only when the buyer accepts lower limits, higher cost, waiting periods, or other restrictions [72].
  • Transamerica declined or heavily rated: consider carriers with publicly available underwriting guides or stronger demonstrated accommodation for driving-history impairments [72].
  • New York residents needing Trendsetter Super: Trendsetter Super is reported unavailable in New York, so Trendsetter LB or another carrier is required [73].

One platform's research frames the decision rule directly: use an independent life-insurance broker representing multiple carriers when the DUI is recent or there are multiple offenses [72]. Another states that identical cases can receive wildly different outcomes by carrier, so the case must be shopped correctly [74].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Transamerica before signing a DUI life insurance contract?
  • How can a buyer with a DUI get a Transamerica underwriting decision before applying?

These questions come from the platform research and should be answered in writing before a formal application.

  1. How many years back does Transamerica review DUI/DWI convictions and motor-vehicle records for this exact product and state? [75]
  2. How does Transamerica treat one DUI versus multiple DUIs, a pending charge, an accident, a suspended license, or refusal of chemical testing? [75]
  3. Would this record qualify for simplified, accelerated, or non-medical underwriting, or require full underwriting and laboratory testing? [75]
  4. What risk class, table rating, flat extra, or postponement would Transamerica likely consider based on the applicant's exact dates and record? [75]
  5. Does current alcohol use, prior treatment, counseling, relapse history, or a substance-use diagnosis change the underwriting decision? [75]
  6. What are the exact annual premium, policy fee, modal charges, rider charges, and post-level-period premiums? [75]
  7. Is Trendsetter Super, Trendsetter LB, or a permanent product actually available in the applicant's state? [75]
  8. What conversion rights apply, when do they expire, and which permanent products are available for conversion? [75]
  9. Will applying through an independent broker allow a confidential informal inquiry before a formal application or medical-record request? [75]
  10. What exclusions, contestability terms, suicide limitation, surrender charges, and lapse provisions apply to the final policy? [75]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Transamerica is a mixed fit for life insurance after a DUI. Five of seven platforms named it in the ranking stage at an average listed rank of 4.4, and every platform that named it pointed to the same product family: individually underwritten Trendsetter term or FFIUL permanent coverage. The structural case is real — Standard and Table A–D risk classes mean a single older DUI may produce a rated offer rather than a decline, and conversion rights provide a path to permanent coverage without new underwriting.

The limitation is equally real. Transamerica publishes no DUI-specific lookback period, surcharge schedule, or acceptance rule, and independent brokers do not name it as a preferred DUI carrier. Platform fit ratings split across good, mixed, and uncertain, and the two published underwriting grids conflict on timing and rating structure. Platform agreement here reflects shared uncertainty about Transamerica's DUI treatment, not shared confidence in its performance.

The practical verdict: Transamerica is worth submitting for informal underwriting alongside several competing carriers, especially when the DUI is old and isolated. It is not a strong standalone recommendation for recent or multiple DUIs without individualized carrier comparison. Buyers who want a predictable answer before applying should look at carriers with published or demonstrated driving-history accommodation first.

How This Review Was Produced

This review evaluates Transamerica only for the Life Insurance After a DUI use case. It is not a broad company review.

Seven AI platforms were queried with the same buyer prompt: a consumer with a DUI or DWI in their driving history who wants life insurance and understands that underwriting may consider how long ago the incident occurred, whether there were multiple offenses, current driving record, alcohol or substance-use history, treatment where applicable, and other risk factors. Platforms returned fit assessments, product identifications, pricing and terms, limitations, and verification questions. Five of seven platforms named Transamerica during ranking discovery.

The study date is 2026-09-22. Platform-reported research dates differ: deepseek reported 2026-06-01, while anthropic, google, grok, kimi, openai, and perplexity reported 2026-09-23. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

All platform outputs are platform-reported and were not independently verified. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Company-owned sources are identified as such in the Sources section. Where a platform supplied no citation for a factual claim, the claim is labeled platform-reported or unverified in the body.

Methodology Limitations

  • Transamerica's specific written underwriting guidelines for DUI applicants are not available in public sources; all evidence is indirect, based on competitor comparisons and agent reports [82].
  • The timeline for when Transamerica treats a DUI as a non-factor is unclear; industry standard is 5–10 years, but the Transamerica-specific timeline is unknown [82].
  • Two public underwriting guides show different age and time grids for DUI treatment, and the exact current internal rule set is unclear [83].
  • Whether Transamerica's stated flexibility with multiple health conditions extends to behavioral or lifestyle risk factors like DUI is not confirmed [85].
  • Exact premium impact for DUI applicants is not published; only general industry ranges are available [86].
  • One source stating Transamerica allows one major violation for best rates is dated December 2023 and may be outdated or specific to one broker's experience [88].
  • Several Transamerica documents are older, agent-oriented, or product-version specific; current state availability and underwriting rules may differ [89].
  • Public product pages and guides describe different Trendsetter versions and policy forms, so the exact current form must be confirmed for the applicant's state [89].
  • No DUI-specific premium examples or approval outcomes were verified [89].
  • Simplified or accelerated underwriting eligibility for a DUI applicant is unclear [89].
  • Product availability, riders, policy forms, fees, and conversion terms vary by state [89].
  • Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date; this is disclosed above and does not independently prove freshness.
  • The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage.
  • One platform (deepseek) reported search disabled; its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.
  • No platform agreement in this review proves product quality, pricing competitiveness, or approval likelihood for any specific applicant.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • PDF GUIDE TO INITIAL UNDERWRITING REQUIREMENTS: https://pinneyinsurance.com/images/underwriting/Trans%202-11.pdf
  • Additional AI research evidence90 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    2. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    6. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    10. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    16. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    18. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    19. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    22. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c7
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    27. AI research evidence record grok:web:8
    28. AI research evidence record google:1.3.5
    29. AI research evidence record perplexity:c12
    30. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:mozdex-dui-2026
    32. AI research evidence record kimi:diversified-quotes-dui
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    34. AI research evidence record grok:web:10
    35. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    37. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    41. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    44. AI research evidence record openai:c5
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    47. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    48. AI research evidence record google:1.3.5
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    50. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    51. AI research evidence record openai:c8
    52. AI research evidence record kimi:diversified-quotes-dui
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    54. AI research evidence record kimi:marketwatch-dui-2024
    55. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    60. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    61. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    63. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    64. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    65. AI research evidence record google:1.3.5
    66. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    67. AI research evidence record google:1.2.1
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.2.3
    69. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    70. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    71. AI research evidence record kimi:mozdex-protective-2026
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    75. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    76. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    77. AI research evidence record google:1.3.5
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    79. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    83. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    84. AI research evidence record perplexity:c12
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    87. AI research evidence record kimi:marketwatch-dui-2024
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    89. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c2

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
39
Ranking mentions
5 of 7
Platform share
71%
Final consensus rank
#6

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

27 independent · 11 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

20 direct · 10 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

50f053ca1f43f7b643de74367e85f4303c8778a48a119731e07e408291a8ec77