Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Royal Neighbors of America Graded-Benefit Final Expense Insurance Fit Review

Royal Neighbors of America is a good fit to consider for Graded-Benefit Final Expense Insurance, with a documentation caveat.

Research: 2026-09-227 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Royal Neighbors of America is a good fit to consider for Graded-Benefit Final Expense Insurance, with a documentation caveat. Three of seven platforms named it during the ranking stage (deepseek, kimi, perplexity), and all seven platforms that evaluated fit rated it "good" except kimi, which rated it "uncertain." The strongest reason to consider it is a specifically identified graded-death-benefit whole-life form (Ensured Legacy, Form Series 211312) from a carrier reporting an A (Excellent) AM Best rating. The main limitation is that Royal Neighbors does not publicly disclose the graded tier's exact early-year benefit schedule, underwriting rules, state-specific availability, or sample premiums, and independent sources conflict on state availability and coverage caps.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 platforms (deepseek, kimi, perplexity)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank6.33
Best listed rank4 (kimi)
Relevant product/model/planEnsured Legacy Final Expense — Graded Death Benefit, Form Series 211312
Overall use-case fitGood, with a meaningful documentation caveat
Research date2026-09-22

Why Royal Neighbors of America Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Royal Neighbors of America a good choice for Graded-Benefit Final Expense Insurance?
  • Why did only three of seven AI platforms name Royal Neighbors of America in the ranking stage?

Royal Neighbors of America qualified because it offers a specifically identified graded-death-benefit final expense product rather than relying only on guaranteed issue. The relevant product is Ensured Legacy Final Expense — Graded Death Benefit, Form Series 211312, which Royal Neighbors presents as part of a suite that also includes simplified-issue and guaranteed-issue versions [1].

The entity cleared the study's minimum-mentions threshold with three of seven platforms naming it during ranking discovery: deepseek (rank 9), kimi (rank 4), and perplexity (rank 6). That produces an average listed rank of 6.33 and a best listed rank of 4. The remaining four platforms evaluated fit but did not name the entity during ranking discovery, so their fit ratings are included without a corresponding rank.

Carrier reputation supported qualification. Royal Neighbors reports that AM Best affirmed an A (Excellent) financial-strength rating on December 12, 2025, which the company describes as the third-highest of 13 rating categories [5]. An independent press release also reports the A (Excellent) rating as of December 2025 [6]. Royal Neighbors operates as a nonprofit, member-owned fraternal benefit society [7].

One qualification caveat must be disclosed: official-site retrieval for the entity failed at the ranking stage, and the reported domain remains unverified in that step. One platform (deepseek) could not verify the "Ensured Legacy" product name against official materials at all [8].

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Graded-Benefit Final Expense Insurance

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Royal Neighbors of America plan should a buyer choose if they have health conditions that may prevent level-benefit approval?
  • Does Royal Neighbors of America's Ensured Legacy graded tier pay a partial death benefit or only return premiums in the first two years?

The relevant product is Ensured Legacy Final Expense — Graded Death Benefit, Form Series 211312. Royal Neighbors markets it as one of three qualification paths inside the Ensured Legacy suite: Simplified Issue, Graded Death Benefit, and Guaranteed Issue [9].

The graded structure is the core of the fit. Multiple platforms describe a two-year graded period in which natural-cause death pays a partial benefit rather than a full return of premiums. Grok and perplexity both report a 30% payout in year one, 70% in year two, and 100% thereafter for natural causes, with accidental death paying 100% during the first two years [11]. One independent source describes the same partial-benefit-in-years-1–2, full-benefit-in-year-3 structure [15]. A company brochure cited by anthropic states partial benefit in years 1–2 on natural death and full benefit in year 3, with policy loans at 7.4% interest [16].

This partial-percentage structure is a meaningful differentiator. Kimi's research notes that competitors typically return premiums plus interest (commonly 4.5%–10%) during the graded period, while Royal Neighbors' reported structure pays a percentage of face amount [17]. Google's research calls the 30%/70% structure "industry-leading" relative to return-of-premium waiting periods [13].

However, the exact schedule is not uniformly confirmed. OpenAI's research states that the public consumer page and brochure do not disclose the exact percentage, duration, or treatment of premiums paid during the graded period [21]. Deepseek could not confirm the graded-period length at all [22]. Buyers should treat the 30%/70%/100% structure as platform-reported and confirm it in the state-specific certificate.

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Royal Neighbors of America for graded-benefit final expense coverage?
  • Is Royal Neighbors of America's graded-benefit final expense policy permanent coverage with level premiums?

Agreement was strong on product category, permanence, and carrier reputation, and mixed on nearly everything else.

Platforms agreed that Royal Neighbors offers a graded-benefit final expense whole-life product. OpenAI, anthropic, grok, perplexity, and google all identify Ensured Legacy with a graded tier [23]. Deepseek and kimi identified a graded tier but could not verify the "Ensured Legacy" name [28].

Platforms agreed the coverage is permanent whole life. Royal Neighbors describes Ensured Legacy Final Expense as permanent life insurance [23]. Independent sources state premiums remain constant throughout the policyholder's life and coverage never decreases [30], and that the policy matures at age 121 [25].

Platforms agreed on carrier financial strength. Royal Neighbors reports an A (Excellent) AM Best rating affirmed December 12, 2025 [31], corroborated by an independent press release [32] and company agent materials [33].

Platforms agreed that no medical exam is required. Eligibility is determined by health questions, build chart, pharmacy and MIB review, with an optional attending physician statement if flagged [34].

Platforms agreed that accidental death is treated differently from natural death during the graded period. Multiple sources state accidental death pays the full benefit during the first 24 months [37].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Royal Neighbors of America's graded-benefit final expense plan available in my state?
  • What is the maximum face amount on Royal Neighbors of America's graded death benefit tier?

Disagreement and uncertainty centered on state availability, coverage caps, pricing, and customer service.

State availability is the sharpest conflict. Anthropic's research states the graded plan is available only in Connecticut, Florida, and North Dakota [39]. OpenAI's research states Royal Neighbors is licensed in all states and the District of Columbia except Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New York, and that not all products are available in all states [41]. Google's research lists the same seven excluded states [42]. Perplexity notes that independent review material reports state restrictions that conflict with or are not fully confirmed by Royal Neighbors' own public pages [43]. These two positions cannot both be fully correct, and the buyer must verify state eligibility directly.

Coverage caps conflict. Anthropic cites a $10,000 maximum on the graded tier with a $7,000 minimum [39]. Grok reports a $20,000 maximum on the graded tier [44]. Google states the graded tier caps at $10,000 to $20,000 depending on state and age [45]. OpenAI notes the suite advertises $5,000 to $40,000 but the graded-tier maximum is not separately stated [41]. Perplexity found conflicting ranges of $5,000–$10,000 versus higher amounts depending on qualification path [47].

Pricing is undisclosed across every platform. No platform located a public consumer rate table or sample premium for the graded tier [41]. Anthropic reports simplified-issue premiums typically range $35–$175 per month for coverage up to $35,000, with graded-tier pricing estimated higher but not separately disclosed [52].

Customer service evidence is contradictory. One independent review characterizes the graded plan as having higher costs, long hold times, administrative delays, and customer service concerns [54]. Another cites mixed reviews with some praise and some warnings about hidden fees and cancellation difficulty [40]. No objective service metrics were supplied.

Fit ratings diverged. Six platforms rated the fit "good" (openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google, perplexity). Kimi rated it "uncertain," citing that critical purchase-decision details are not independently verifiable through 2026 public sources [51].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does Royal Neighbors of America's graded-benefit final expense policy include for applicants with health conditions?
  • Does Royal Neighbors of America use height and weight charts when underwriting graded-benefit final expense coverage?

The graded tier's most relevant feature is its partial-benefit structure during the waiting period. Rather than returning only premiums plus interest on natural-cause death in years 1–2, the reported structure pays 30% of face amount in year one and 70% in year two, reaching 100% in year three [55].

Accidental death is covered at full benefit from day one during the graded period, except in Arkansas per one source [60].

Underwriting flexibility is a reported advantage. One independent source states Royal Neighbors does not use height and weight charts to enforce BMI guidelines in underwriting [64]. Another reports flexibility with diabetes, with diabetics starting insulin at age 30 or later potentially qualifying for first-day coverage [65]. These are platform-reported findings from independent review sites, not company-confirmed underwriting rules.

The accelerated death benefit rider is described as included at no additional premium, subject to eligibility, with a $7,000 minimum face amount [66]. One source states it allows access to up to 75% of the death benefit (minimum $5,000) for terminal illness or nursing home confinement of 90+ days, subject to an administrative fee and interest [67]. Google's research states the rider applies for face amounts of $7,000 or more [68].

Additional riders include a charitable-giving rider (1% of face up to $1,000 to charity) and an accidental-death rider; the brochure states the charitable-giving and accelerated-death-benefit riders have no additional premium, while grandchild and accidental-death riders require additional premium [69].

Fraternal membership benefits are a secondary feature. Sources describe a $200 relief fund for financial hardship, prescription discounts, health screenings, and grant or scholarship opportunities [70].

The policy is not a funeral contract. The death benefit is paid to designated beneficiaries, who may use proceeds for any purpose, and the company does not guarantee that proceeds will cover particular funeral goods or services [66].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Royal Neighbors of America cost per month for graded-benefit final expense insurance, and are there setup or cancellation fees?
  • What fees and interest charges apply to Royal Neighbors of America's accelerated death benefit and policy loans?

Pricing confidence is low across every platform. No public consumer rate table or sample premium for the Graded Death Benefit tier was located in the reviewed official materials [72]. Premium depends on factors such as age, sex, face amount, state, tobacco status, payment mode, and underwriting classification [72].

Reported cost elements vary by source and should be verified:

Cost elementReported detailSource
Graded-tier premiumNot publicly disclosed; requires agent quote,,,
Simplified-issue benchmark$35–$175/month for coverage up to $35,000
Sample simplified-issue quoteAbout $37.89/month for males in their 50s
Annual certificate fee$50 (commissionable), per agent materials
Policy loan interest7.4% compounded annually
Policy loan interest (alternate)8% in arrears, 6% in Montana
Accelerated death benefitAdministrative fee and interest when accessed,
Application or policy feeNone identified in reviewed public materials

The policy loan interest conflict is material: anthropic cites 7.4% compounded annually [74], while google cites 8% in arrears with 6% in Montana [75]. Buyers should confirm the applicable rate in the certificate.

Contract terms reported across platforms include permanent whole-life coverage with no expiration age, policies maturing at age 121 [76]; fixed-level premiums guaranteed for life that never increase [78]; a 20-day free-look period per one source [79] and a 30-day free-look period per another [80]; and a two-year graded period with full coverage from year three [81].

One structural limitation: as a fraternal benefit society, Royal Neighbors policies are not protected by state guarantee funds, unlike traditional insurers [83]. The reported A (Excellent) AM Best rating mitigates but does not eliminate this consideration.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Royal Neighbors of America's graded-benefit final expense plan best suited for?
  • Is Royal Neighbors of America a good fit for an applicant with diabetes or a BMI concern who needs final expense coverage?

Royal Neighbors is best suited for applicants with moderate health impairments who may be declined for simplified-issue level-benefit coverage but may qualify for graded coverage [84]. The platform-reported fit profile centers on applicants roughly ages 50–85, though the graded tier's age window is reported more narrowly as 50–75 by one source [85].

Buyers prioritizing permanent whole-life coverage and predictable premiums are a reported fit, subject to confirmation in the certificate [84]. Applicants with diabetes, blood pressure issues, or similar chronic conditions are cited as a fit given documented flexibility [90]. Applicants whose height or weight might disqualify them from other medically underwritten plans are also cited, because Royal Neighbors reportedly does not use BMI or height/weight charts [91].

Consumers who value fraternal benefits, community involvement, and a nonprofit member-owned structure are a reported fit [85]. Applicants in states where the Graded Death Benefit form is available and whose quoted premium is competitive after comparing other impaired-risk carriers are the strongest fit [84].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Royal Neighbors of America for graded-benefit final expense insurance?
  • Is Royal Neighbors of America a poor fit for a buyer who needs more than $20,000 in graded coverage?

Royal Neighbors is probably not best suited for applicants in Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, or New York, where Royal Neighbors states it is not licensed [93]. Buyers needing an immediate full death benefit from day one are also a poor fit [93].

Buyers who need graded coverage above the applicable cap are a poor fit. The cap is reported as $10,000 by one source [96] and $20,000 by another [97], with google reporting $10,000–$20,000 depending on state and age [98]. Applicants under age 50 or over age 75 are outside the reported graded-plan eligibility window [96].

Buyers who require publicly available rate tables, a clearly posted graded-benefit schedule, or fully online self-service purchasing are a poor fit [93]. Royal Neighbors does not sell directly; coverage is available only through licensed agents and agencies [95]. Buyers who prefer to pay premiums via credit or debit card are also a poor fit, as bank account draft is reported as the only accepted payment method [98].

Buyers concerned about the fraternal structure and lack of state guarantee fund protection should weigh that limitation [100].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Royal Neighbors of America for a buyer who needs a shorter graded period or a return-of-premiums structure?
  • When should a buyer choose a different carrier over Royal Neighbors of America for graded-benefit final expense coverage?

Another option may be better in several defined situations.

If the applicant qualifies for level-benefit simplified-issue coverage, that plan is preferable because it provides immediate full coverage with no waiting period [101]. If the applicant lives outside the states where the graded form is available, an alternative carrier with broader availability should be evaluated [101].

If the buyer needs a larger death benefit than the graded-tier maximum, another carrier may fit better [103]. If the buyer needs guaranteed issue with no health questions, a guaranteed-issue product may fit better, accepting that guaranteed-issue pricing and waiting-period terms may differ [103].

If the buyer prioritizes a shorter waiting period, competitors are reported to offer one-year or 90-day graded options, while the Royal Neighbors standard is reported as two years [101]. If the buyer prefers a return-of-premiums-plus-interest structure rather than partial percentage payouts, competitors such as Transamerica, Mutual of Omaha, GTL Heritage, and BetterLife are cited as alternatives with published structures [105]. If the buyer wants the most transparent price comparison, GTL Heritage is cited as publishing full rate cards [107].

If the buyer needs maximum state guarantee fund protection, a traditional insurer rather than a fraternal society may be preferable [109]. If the buyer prefers direct-to-consumer purchase, some competitors offer digital-first sales while Royal Neighbors requires a licensed agent [101].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Royal Neighbors of America before signing a graded-benefit final expense contract?
  • How can a buyer confirm the exact graded-period payout schedule before purchasing?

The following questions should be answered in writing before accepting coverage. They are drawn from the verification lists supplied by the platforms that evaluated this entity.

  1. What exact death-benefit percentage or dollar amount is payable in each policy year during the graded period, and when does the full benefit begin? [110]
  2. Does the graded benefit apply to natural death only, and are accidental death, suicide, or other causes treated differently? [110]
  3. What is the full monthly or annual premium for the desired face amount, and is it guaranteed for life if paid on time? [110]
  4. What health conditions, medications, hospitalizations, substance-use history, tobacco status, and look-back periods determine the graded classification? [110]
  5. What is the maximum face amount and issue-age range for the graded tier in the buyer's state? [110]
  6. Is the accelerated-death-benefit rider included automatically or only if elected, and what terminal-condition or nursing-home requirements apply? [110]
  7. What are the contestability, suicide, grace-period, reinstatement, lapse, surrender, and nonforfeiture provisions? [110]
  8. Are there policy fees, modal-payment charges, rider premiums, or state-specific charges? [110]
  9. Is the agent comparing Royal Neighbors with level-benefit and graded-benefit alternatives using the same face amount, payment mode, and underwriting facts? [110]
  10. Can the buyer review the state-specific certificate, illustration, and graded-benefit endorsement before accepting coverage? [110]

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Royal Neighbors of America is a good fit to consider for graded-benefit final expense insurance, with a meaningful documentation caveat. Six of seven platforms rated the fit "good"; kimi rated it "uncertain" because critical purchase-decision details are not independently verifiable through 2026 public sources.

The strongest reason to consider it is a specifically identified graded-death-benefit whole-life form (Ensured Legacy, Form Series 211312) from a carrier reporting an A (Excellent) AM Best rating, with a reported partial-benefit structure during the graded period that is more generous than a simple return of premiums.

The main limitation is documentation. Royal Neighbors does not publicly disclose the graded tier's exact early-year benefit schedule, underwriting rules, state-specific availability, or sample premiums. Independent sources conflict on state availability (three states versus a seven-state exclusion list) and on the graded-tier coverage cap ($10,000 versus $20,000). The buyer should not purchase until the exact graded death-benefit schedule, guaranteed premium, underwriting classification, state availability, and total cost are documented in the illustration and certificate.

AI-platform agreement does not prove product quality. It reflects what the platforms reported from the sources they retrieved, and several of those sources are independent review sites rather than company filings.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a structured research run dated 2026-09-22. Seven AI platforms evaluated Royal Neighbors of America for fit against the graded-benefit final expense use case: openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, google, kimi, and perplexity. Three of the seven named the entity during the ranking stage (deepseek, kimi, perplexity); all seven supplied fit-research responses.

Each platform returned a fit rating, a direct answer, strengths and limitations, pricing and terms, use-case findings, and a verification checklist. Those outputs were consolidated into this review. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Where a platform supplied no citation for a factual claim, the claim is labeled platform-reported or unverified.

The consensus index for this category is available at Graded-Benefit Final Expense Insurance, which lists all carriers evaluated for this use case. Broader context on the category is available in the life insurance directory.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply to this review.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date of 2026-09-22. Six platforms reported 2026-09-23; deepseek reported 2026-06-10. These dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Official-site retrieval failed for the entity at the ranking stage (HTTP 403), so the reported domain remains unverified in that step. One platform (deepseek) could not verify the "Ensured Legacy" product name against official materials at all.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts.

No platform located public graded-tier pricing, so all cost figures in this review are either simplified-issue benchmarks or agent-material references, not confirmed graded-tier rates.

Independent evidence reviewed did not establish product-specific approval rates, claims experience, or comparative value. Customer service evidence is contradictory and lacks objective metrics.

Platform-reported research dates and model versions vary, and one platform (deepseek) ran without search enabled, which limits the currency of its findings.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Royal Neighbors of America Final Expense Insurance | Product Details & Agent Resources: https://agent.royalneighbors.org/
  • Royal Neighbors of America — Final Expense Whole Life Insurance: https://royalneighbors.org/
  • Graded Benefit Whole Life: Guaranteed Final Expense Coverage: https://www.betterlifeins.com/life-insurance/final-expense/graded-benefit-whole-life/
  • Insurance with a Difference - Royal Neighbors of America: https://www.royalneighbors.org/
  • Annual Report - Royal Neighbors of America: https://www.royalneighbors.org/about-us/annual-report/
  • Royal Neighbors of America - Agents: https://www.royalneighbors.org/agents/
  • Royal Neighbors of America - Insurance: https://www.royalneighbors.org/insurance/
  • Ensured Legacy Final Expense - Royal Neighbors of America: https://www.royalneighbors.org/insurance/ensured-legacy-final-expense/
  • Royal Neighbors Launches New Final Expense Product Catering to: https://www.royalneighbors.org/must-reads/newsroom/2024/01/22/RNA-New-Final-Expense-Product
  • Additional AI research evidence117 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    4. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    11. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    12. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    14. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:betterlife-graded
    18. AI research evidence record kimi:transamerica-review
    19. AI research evidence record kimi:mutual-omaha-graded
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:gtl-review
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    25. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    28. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    29. AI research evidence record kimi:rn-unverified
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    36. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    44. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    45. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    47. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    49. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    50. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    51. AI research evidence record kimi:rn-unverified
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    55. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    57. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    63. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    64. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    69. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    71. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    75. AI research evidence record google:1.2.7
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    77. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    80. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    82. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    87. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    91. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    94. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    97. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    98. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    99. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    104. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:transamerica-review
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:mutual-omaha-graded
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:gtl-review
    108. AI research evidence record kimi:betterlife-graded
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    112. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    113. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    115. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    116. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    117. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence117 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    3. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    4. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    7. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    8. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:c12
    10. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    11. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    12. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    13. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    14. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    17. AI research evidence record kimi:betterlife-graded
    18. AI research evidence record kimi:transamerica-review
    19. AI research evidence record kimi:mutual-omaha-graded
    20. AI research evidence record kimi:gtl-review
    21. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    23. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:c1
    25. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    26. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    27. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    28. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    29. AI research evidence record kimi:rn-unverified
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    31. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    32. AI research evidence record anthropic:c2
    33. AI research evidence record anthropic:c13
    34. AI research evidence record anthropic:c7
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    36. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    37. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    43. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    44. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    45. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    46. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    47. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    48. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    49. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    50. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    51. AI research evidence record kimi:rn-unverified
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:c16
    53. AI research evidence record anthropic:c17
    54. AI research evidence record anthropic:c4
    55. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    56. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    57. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    58. AI research evidence record google:2.1.6
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:c8
    60. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    62. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    63. AI research evidence record google:2.1.3
    64. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    68. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    69. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    71. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:c11
    75. AI research evidence record google:1.2.7
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    77. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    80. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    81. AI research evidence record anthropic:c14
    82. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    84. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    85. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    87. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    90. AI research evidence record anthropic:c9
    91. AI research evidence record google:2.1.2
    92. AI research evidence record google:2.2.7
    93. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    94. AI research evidence record google:2.1.1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    97. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    98. AI research evidence record google:1.1.2
    99. AI research evidence record google:1.2.9
    100. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    101. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    102. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    103. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    104. AI research evidence record perplexity:c3
    105. AI research evidence record kimi:transamerica-review
    106. AI research evidence record kimi:mutual-omaha-graded
    107. AI research evidence record kimi:gtl-review
    108. AI research evidence record kimi:betterlife-graded
    109. AI research evidence record anthropic:c19
    110. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    111. AI research evidence record anthropic:c10
    112. AI research evidence record anthropic:c5
    113. AI research evidence record anthropic:c15
    114. AI research evidence record anthropic:c6
    115. AI research evidence record grok:web:9
    116. AI research evidence record anthropic:c3
    117. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 22, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
37
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#8

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

24 independent · 10 company-owned · 3 unclear

Evidence support

33 direct · 4 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

059863cf0eede39478934f686d49bc9383f950d1fd1a40e3b96c1867e55a66ec