Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Aetna Final Expense Insurance Fit Review for People in Their 50s

Aetna is a good fit for a nonsmoking buyer in their 50s with average-to-good health who wants roughly $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage, provided they qualify for the level-benefit tier and live in an eligible state.

Research: 2026-09-217 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Aetna is a good fit for a nonsmoking buyer in their 50s with average-to-good health who wants roughly $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage, provided they qualify for the level-benefit tier and live in an eligible state. Three of the seven included platforms named Aetna during the ranking stage, and all six platforms that returned a usable fit assessment rated it "good." The strongest reason to consider it is simplified-issue whole life with no medical exam, level premiums, and an A (Excellent) AM Best rating for the Aetna group. The main limitation is that no verified public premium exists for this buyer profile, and Aetna is not clearly the lowest-cost option.

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage3 of 7 included platforms (deepseek, grok, kimi)
Share of included platform responses42.9%
Average listed rank4.0
Best listed rank3
Relevant product/model/planAccendo Final Expense Individual Whole Life Insurance, including the Final Expense Level benefit / Simplified Issue Whole Life plan
Overall use-case fitGood (6 of 7 platforms returned a usable fit assessment; all six rated it "good")
Research date2026-09-21

Why Aetna Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Aetna a good choice for Final Expense Insurance for People in Their 50s?
  • Why did Aetna qualify for this final expense study when only three platforms named it?

Aetna qualified because it met the study's minimum-mention threshold and because the platforms that assessed it agreed on fit. Three of the seven included platforms named Aetna during ranking discovery, which cleared the two-mention minimum [1]. Six of the seven platforms returned a usable fit assessment, and every one of those six rated Aetna "good" for this use case.

The product matches the buyer's stated criteria on paper. Published materials describe Accendo Final Expense as individual whole life insurance with issue ages 40–89 and face amounts from $2,000 to $50,000, which places a $20,000 policy for a buyer in their 50s inside the published range [3]. The product uses simplified yes/no underwriting with no traditional medical exam [3].

Aetna also carries an established-carrier signal. AM Best affirmed an A (Excellent) financial-strength rating with a stable outlook for Aetna Life Insurance Company and other Aetna Health & Life Group entities in June 2026 [5]. That rating applies to the Aetna group; the buyer must confirm which legal entity issues the policy.

This review sits inside a broader comparison of Final Expense Insurance for People in Their 50s, where Aetna is one of several carriers evaluated against the same buyer profile.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Final Expense Insurance for People in Their 50s

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Aetna plan should a buyer in their 50s choose for $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage?
  • Is Aetna's Accendo Final Expense plan whole life or term, and does it build cash value?

The relevant product is Accendo Final Expense Individual Whole Life Insurance, specifically the Final Expense Level benefit, also described as a Simplified Issue Whole Life plan [7]. It is permanent whole life coverage, not term, and it accumulates cash value [9].

Published materials list issue ages of 40–89 and face amounts from $2,000 to $50,000, subject to age-based limits [11]. A $20,000 policy for a buyer aged 50–59 falls within that published range. The product brochure states that premiums will not increase while required premiums are paid [7].

Aetna distributes final expense coverage through two affiliated issuing companies: Accendo Insurance Company and Continental Life Insurance Company, sometimes described as the Protection Series [13]. The two lines differ in underwriting questions and pricing, so the buyer should confirm which product is available in their state before comparing quotes.

The plan structure typically includes level, graded, and modified benefit tiers [15]. The level tier pays the full death benefit from policy issue for qualifying applicants; the modified tier applies a two-year graded period during which non-accidental death returns premiums plus interest rather than paying the full face amount [15].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Aetna final expense coverage for buyers in their 50s?
  • Does Aetna final expense require a medical exam for applicants aged 50 to 59?

The platforms agreed on four points: product type, underwriting style, premium structure, and carrier strength.

On product type, the platforms consistently described Aetna's final expense offering as simplified-issue whole life insurance designed for funeral and end-of-life costs [18]. Coverage is permanent if required premiums are paid.

On underwriting, the platforms agreed that no medical exam is required. Applicants answer simplified health questions, and approval may involve prescription-history or database checks [18]. The level tier provides a full death benefit from day one for applicants who qualify [24].

On premium structure, the platforms agreed that premiums are level and guaranteed not to increase while premiums are paid, and that the death benefit does not decrease [18].

On carrier strength, the platforms cited an A (Excellent) AM Best rating for the Aetna group, affirmed in June 2026 [26]. This is evidence of financial strength for the rated entities, not proof of product quality or of the exact issuing insurer's rating.

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • Is Aetna's final expense coverage available in New York or Pacific Time Zone states?
  • How much does Aetna final expense cost per month for a nonsmoker aged 50 to 59?

The platforms disagreed or were uncertain on pricing, state availability, coverage maximums, and the exact issuing insurer.

Pricing is the largest gap. No platform located a verified public premium for a nonsmoking applicant aged 50–59 seeking $20,000 [29]. One platform reported third-party examples of about $27 per month for a female and $34 per month for a male at age 50 for $10,000 of level coverage, with higher premiums at larger face amounts [32]. Another platform extrapolated roughly $54 per month for a female and $68 per month for a male at age 50 for $20,000 [34]. These are platform-reported estimates, not carrier quotes.

State availability is contested. One platform stated the product is available in 49 states plus Washington, D.C., but not New York, and not in any Pacific Time Zone state [35]. Another platform stated availability in all states except New York [37]. The buyer must verify their own state.

Coverage maximums conflict. Some sources cite a maximum of $35,000 for ages 45–65, while others cite up to $50,000 [38]. The variation likely depends on product line, state, and underwriting tier, but the supplied evidence does not resolve it.

The issuing insurer is also uncertain. Published materials identify Accendo Insurance Company as the underwriter and Aetna Life Insurance Company or affiliates as administrator, and the exact legal insurer may vary [29]. The AM Best rating cited here primarily concerns Aetna Life Insurance Company and the Aetna Health & Life Group, so the buyer should confirm the rating of the exact issuing entity [41].

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features does Aetna's Accendo Final Expense level plan offer a 50-something buyer?
  • Does Aetna final expense pay the full death benefit from day one for average-to-good health applicants?

The level-benefit tier is the feature most relevant to this buyer. It pays the full death benefit from policy issue for qualifying applicants, including some with common pre-existing conditions such as COPD, diabetes, and multiple sclerosis [42]. That aligns with the buyer's stated preference for coverage intended to remain in force for life.

The modified tier is the main feature risk. Applicants assigned to it face a two-year graded period in which non-accidental death returns premiums plus interest rather than paying the full face amount; full benefits begin in year three [43]. Accidental death generally pays the full benefit even during the waiting period [44].

Optional riders reported by the platforms include an Accelerated Death Benefit of up to 50% of the benefit for a qualifying condition with life expectancy of 12 or more months, an Accidental Death Benefit that doubles the benefit for ages 40–70, and a Children's Term Rider [44]. Non-forfeiture options such as reduced paid-up, extended term, and automatic premium loans may reduce lapse risk [45].

The death benefit is paid as a tax-free lump sum to named beneficiaries with no restrictions on use [46]. Cash value accumulates over time and can be borrowed against or accessed through surrender, though unpaid loans reduce the death benefit [48].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Aetna final expense cost per month for $20,000 of coverage at age 50 to 59?
  • Are there policy fees or cancellation charges on Aetna's Accendo Final Expense plan?

No verified public premium exists for this buyer profile, so affordability cannot be established without a state-specific quote [49]. Premiums depend on age, sex, tobacco status, health answers, benefit tier, state, and underwriting classification.

Platform-reported estimates vary. Third-party rate tables cited by one platform show about $27 per month for a female and $34 per month for a male at age 50 for $10,000 of level coverage, with higher premiums at $15,000 and $25,000 [50]. Another platform extrapolated roughly $54 per month for a female and $68 per month for a male at age 50 for $20,000 [53]. A third platform cited industry benchmarks of roughly $13.92 to $34.55 per month for nonsmokers at age 50 for $10,000–$15,000 of coverage [54]. These figures are platform-reported and not carrier-verified.

On fees, one platform cited an annual policy fee of $40 in one Accendo brochure version, and another cited a $25 policy fee in an older agent product chart with exceptions [55]. Neither is confirmed as current for every state or policy. The buyer should treat both as unverified until the illustration confirms them.

On contract terms, coverage remains subject to timely premium payment and the policy's lapse, grace-period, nonforfeiture, and reinstatement provisions [49]. Modified-benefit policies may pay less than the face amount during an initial period, and the exact contract language must be verified before purchase [49].

A Super Preferred rate may be available to qualifying applicants with a recently underwritten Accendo or Aetna Medicare Supplement policy, described as roughly a 10% reduction from the preferred rate [56]. The exact savings and conditions are not consistently specified across sources.

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Aetna's Accendo Final Expense plan best suited for among buyers in their 50s?
  • Is Aetna a good fit for a 50-something nonsmoker with average-to-good health who wants no medical exam?

Aetna is best suited for a nonsmoking buyer aged 50–59 with average-to-good health who wants permanent coverage, simplified underwriting, and an established carrier, and who can qualify for the level-benefit tier [60].

It also suits buyers who value predictable approval over the absolute lowest premium. One platform described Aetna's approval process as the easiest and most predictable among compared carriers, with day-one level coverage for qualifying applicants [64]. Another described the underwriting as predictable and instant for most applicants [62].

It may also suit buyers who already hold an Aetna Medicare Supplement policy, because the Super Preferred rate is tied to that relationship [65]. Buyers who want agent assistance rather than a fully digital purchase also fit, since the product is generally agent-distributed [67].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Aetna for Final Expense Insurance for People in Their 50s?
  • Is Aetna a bad choice for a very healthy 50-something who wants the lowest possible premium?

Aetna is probably not best suited for very healthy applicants who are willing to complete medical underwriting in exchange for a potentially lower premium [69]. One platform reported that Aetna's rates run a little higher than some competitors, including Mutual of Omaha, though underwriting is more predictable [71].

It is also not suited for buyers who need guaranteed acceptance. Aetna uses simplified issue with health questions, not guaranteed issue, and serious conditions such as congestive heart failure, recent stroke or cancer, or dialysis may lead to a decline [73].

Buyers who want a fully digital purchase process, online claims filing, or a broad individual-life product selection are also a poor fit. The product is generally agent-distributed, claims are filed through offline channels, and Aetna's individual-life lineup is limited to final expense whole life [74].

Applicants assigned to the modified tier may also be poorly served, because the two-year graded period limits the initial payout relative to cost [77].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is a better alternative to Aetna for a 50-something buyer who needs guaranteed acceptance?
  • When should a buyer in their 50s choose a different carrier instead of Aetna final expense?

Another option may be better in five situations.

First, when the applicant cannot qualify for the level benefit and needs guaranteed acceptance. Guaranteed-issue products accept applicants regardless of health but typically carry a two-year graded benefit and cost 40–50% more than simplified issue [79].

Second, when the applicant is very healthy and prioritizes the lowest possible premium. A medically underwritten whole life carrier may beat simplified-issue pricing for that profile [81].

Third, when the buyer lives in New York or a Pacific Time Zone state where the product may not be available [83].

Fourth, when the buyer needs a faster digital decision. One platform noted that Transamerica offers decisions in as little as 10 minutes, while Aetna's timeline is described as predictable rather than fastest [86].

Fifth, when the buyer needs coverage beyond final expenses, such as income replacement, debt protection, or legacy planning. A term or larger permanent policy may fit better than a final expense product [81].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Aetna before signing a final expense contract?
  • Which legal insurer will issue the Aetna final expense policy in the buyer's state?

The platforms converged on a similar verification list. Before signing, confirm the following with a licensed agent.

Which legal insurance company will issue the policy in the buyer's state: Accendo Insurance Company, Aetna Life Insurance Company, or another affiliate [87]. Whether the $20,000 level-benefit plan is available at age 50–59 in the buyer's state, and whether the full death benefit is payable from issue subject to any exclusions [87]. The exact monthly or annual premium, including policy fees, billing charges, and selected riders [87]. Whether premiums are guaranteed not to increase for life and what happens after a missed payment or lapse [87].

Also confirm the health questions, prescription-history checks, MIB checks, tobacco rules, and declined-condition rules that apply [87]. Whether the buyer qualifies for the Super Preferred rate and whether the claimed discount appears in the illustration [92]. The cash value, surrender, loan, nonforfeiture, grace-period, and reinstatement provisions [87]. The exclusions and contestability provisions during the first two policy years [87]. The current AM Best rating and complaint records for the exact issuing insurer [87]. And whether the agent can provide competing quotes for medically underwritten whole life and other simplified-issue carriers [87].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Aetna is a good fit for this buyer profile, with a pricing and issuer-verification caveat. Six of the seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment, and all six rated Aetna "good" for a nonsmoking buyer aged 50–59 seeking about $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage. Three of the seven platforms named Aetna during ranking discovery.

The consensus strengths are simplified-issue whole life with no medical exam, level premiums that do not increase while paid, a level-benefit tier that pays the full death benefit from day one for qualifying applicants, and an A (Excellent) AM Best rating for the Aetna group. The consensus limitations are the absence of a verified public premium for this profile, conflicting state-availability claims, conflicting coverage maximums, and uncertainty about the exact issuing insurer.

Platform agreement does not prove product quality. It reflects that the platforms converged on the same published product characteristics. A buyer should purchase only after comparing a current state-specific illustration against at least two alternatives and confirming the exact issuing insurer, current policy terms, and total premium.

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from platform-reported research collected on 2026-09-21. Seven platforms were configured for the study. Six returned a usable fit assessment for Aetna: openai, anthropic, deepseek, grok, kimi, and perplexity. Three platforms named Aetna during the ranking discovery stage: deepseek, grok, and kimi.

Each platform returned a fit rating, a direct answer, strengths, limitations, pricing notes, and questions to verify before buying. The writer stage compiled those responses, preserved conflicts and uncertainties, and cited factual claims to the supplied citation IDs. No independent testing, customer experience, or verification was performed at the writer stage.

Methodology Limitations

Several limitations apply. Only six of the seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment, so the fit findings are not unanimous across the full platform set. Platform mentions in the ranking stage count only platforms that named Aetna during ranking discovery, which is a narrower measure than fit assessment.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts. Claims from platforms without search capability require explicit verification before being treated as current facts.

No platform located a verified public premium for the specified buyer profile, so pricing confidence is low across the board. The available product chart is dated 2023, and some product descriptions are from a 2022 brochure, so current 2026 state availability, policy fees, underwriting rules, and riders are not fully established by the cited materials. Public third-party descriptions report a modified-benefit formula and broad state availability, but those details were not confirmed in a current official policy form for any specific state.

The AM Best rating cited here primarily concerns Aetna Life Insurance Company and the Aetna Health & Life Group. The buyer must verify the rating and legal identity of the exact issuing carrier if it is Accendo Insurance Company or another affiliate.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Final Expense Individual Whole Life Insurance - Accendo Insurance Company: https://mobile.aetna.com/appConfig/SSIeAPP/Broker/Documents/ACC_FE/CA/ACCFE06589CA.pdf
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.aetna.com/
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.aetna.com/#Find
  • Additional AI research evidence96 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_13
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    8. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_1
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_6
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_12
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_15
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_14
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_16
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_1
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:0
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_10
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_6
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_13
    28. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    34. AI research evidence record grok:1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_20
    37. AI research evidence record grok:0
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_11
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_12
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_10
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_14
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_16
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_6
    48. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    50. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    51. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    53. AI research evidence record grok:1
    54. AI research evidence record kimi:insurancegeek
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    63. AI research evidence record grok:0
    64. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_17
    71. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_8
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_14
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_16
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aig-2026
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_21
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_17
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_20
    85. AI research evidence record grok:0
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:consumeradviser
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_12
    89. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    90. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    94. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_13
    96. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence96 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    3. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    5. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    6. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_13
    7. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    8. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_1
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_6
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    12. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_12
    14. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_15
    15. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_14
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    17. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_16
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_1
    20. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    21. AI research evidence record grok:0
    22. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_10
    25. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_6
    26. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_13
    28. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    29. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    30. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    31. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    32. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    33. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    34. AI research evidence record grok:1
    35. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    36. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_20
    37. AI research evidence record grok:0
    38. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_11
    39. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    40. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_12
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_10
    43. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_14
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_16
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_1
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_6
    48. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    49. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    50. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    51. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    52. AI research evidence record perplexity:c5
    53. AI research evidence record grok:1
    54. AI research evidence record kimi:insurancegeek
    55. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    56. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    60. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    61. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    62. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    63. AI research evidence record grok:0
    64. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    65. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    66. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    67. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_17
    71. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    72. AI research evidence record kimi:theburialinsurance
    73. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_8
    74. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    76. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    77. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_14
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_16
    79. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aig-2026
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_21
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_17
    83. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_19
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_20
    85. AI research evidence record grok:0
    86. AI research evidence record kimi:consumeradviser
    87. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    88. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_12
    89. AI research evidence record perplexity:c6
    90. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_2
    92. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    93. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_18
    94. AI research evidence record perplexity:c7
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:citation_13
    96. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 21, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
34
Ranking mentions
3 of 7
Platform share
43%
Final consensus rank
#5

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

26 independent · 7 company-owned · 1 unclear

Evidence support

25 direct · 7 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

fe907c050b143290f3f6e5f20078e28c425e69c1f1234f4928fbc2b05666b4fb