Life Insurance
Consensus Index

AI Consensus Fit Review

Aetna Final Expense Insurance Fit Review for People Ages 80 to 85

Aetna is a good but conditional fit for a nonsmoker aged 80 to 85 seeking $15,000 to $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage.

Research: 2026-09-217 usable platform responsesRead the methodology ↗

Share

Answer Capsule

Aetna is a good but conditional fit for a nonsmoker aged 80 to 85 seeking $15,000 to $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage. Five of the seven platforms in this study named Aetna during the ranking stage, and six returned a usable fit assessment. The strongest reason to consider it: Aetna-affiliated Accendo and Protection Series products state issue ages through 89, and level-benefit tiers can pay full natural-death benefits from day one [1]. The main limitation: no official public premium exists for this buyer profile, and public sources conflict on maximum face amounts at ages 81 to 85, so the exact benefit tier and price must be verified before purchase [1].

Research Snapshot

FieldFinding
Platform mentions in ranking stage5 of 7 platforms (anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, kimi)
Share of included platform responses71.4%
Average listed rank2.4
Best listed rank2
Relevant product/model/planAccendo Final Expense Whole Life; Aetna Protection Series Final Expense Individual Whole Life
Overall use-case fitGood but conditional
Research date2026-09-21

Why Aetna Qualified for This Study

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why did Aetna qualify as a finalist for final expense insurance for people ages 80 to 85?
  • How many AI platforms named Aetna for coverage at ages 80 to 85, and at what average rank?

Aetna qualified because it was named by five of the seven platforms during ranking discovery, with an average listed rank of 2.4 and a best rank of 2 [4]. Six of the seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment, so the fit findings below rest on six assessments, not seven.

The qualification rests on stated issue ages rather than on price leadership. Aetna Senior Products' 2026 product-availability material lists Accendo Final Expense Whole Life with issue ages 40 to 89 and Protection Series with issue ages 45 to 89, with face amounts up to $50,000 and state-specific availability limits [4]. Independent reviews describe the same product family as simplified-issue whole life marketed to seniors, with no medical exam and simple health questions [7].

Aetna is also a large, recognizable carrier. One independent review states Aetna operates as a wholly owned subsidiary of CVS Health Corporation, and another states Aetna life insurance Company holds an A (Excellent) rating from AM Best [9]. Those are platform-reported ratings, not independently verified by this study.

The relevant policies may be issued by Accendo Insurance Company or Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, Tennessee, both presented in Aetna materials as Aetna-affiliated companies [11]. Buyers should evaluate the issuing legal entity, not only the Aetna brand.

The Product, Model, Plan, or Service Most Relevant to Final Expense Insurance for People Ages 80 to 85

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which Aetna plan should a buyer aged 80 to 85 choose for $15,000 to $20,000 of final expense coverage?
  • Does Aetna's Accendo Final Expense plan accept applicants at ages 80 to 85 with no medical exam?

The most relevant products are Accendo Final Expense Whole Life and Aetna Protection Series Final Expense Individual Whole Life Insurance, both simplified-issue permanent whole life [12]. Aetna's own final expense page describes a simplified-issue whole life policy designed to help pay funeral costs, with no medical exam and simple health questions [14].

Accendo Final Expense Whole Life is listed with issue ages 40 to 89 and face amounts of $2,000 to $50,000, with the maximum varying by issue age [12]. Protection Series Final Expense Whole Life is listed with issue ages 45 to 89 and face amounts of $2,000 to $50,000, also subject to age-based maximums [12]. Both ranges can accommodate a $15,000 to $20,000 request in principle, but the exact maximum for an applicant aged 80 to 85 is not published in the availability chart.

Underwriting is tiered. Accendo is described as using a simplified yes/no application and offering level or modified death benefits [12]. A separate agent product source reports that Protection Series uses level-benefit simplified issue underwriting and may involve health questions, a recorded interview, prescription-history review, and MIB review; that underwriting detail is not confirmed in the current official availability document [15]. One independent review describes plan type as determined by yes/no health questions on the application and a prescription drug check [16].

Platforms used different names for what appears to be the same product family. The ranking stage listed Accendo Final Expense / Aetna Senior Products, Aetna Protection Series, and Aetna Final Expense [12]. At least one independent review describes a final expense plan that can be sold through different distributors, so exact plan naming and branding may vary by channel [17].

What the AI Platforms Agreed About

Questions This Section Answers

  • What do AI platforms agree on about Aetna final expense coverage for ages 80 to 85?
  • Is Aetna's final expense product simplified issue with no medical exam for applicants aged 80 to 85?

Platforms agreed on four points.

First, age eligibility. Aetna-affiliated products state issue ages extending through 89, which covers the 80-to-85 band [18]. One independent review states Aetna Final Expense Insurance is available to individuals aged 50 to 89 [19].

Second, simplified issue with no exam. Aetna describes its final expense policy as simplified issue with no medical exams and only simple health questions [22]. Independent reviews state that Aetna-affiliated final expense whole life generally does not require a medical exam, blood test, or physician visit, and that approval is based on a health questionnaire, prescription check, and basic underwriting rather than a paramed exam [23].

Third, benefit timing depends on tier. Accendo level benefit provides the full face value from the policy issue date for accidental and natural death. Accendo modified benefit provides the full accidental-death benefit immediately, but non-accidental death is limited during policy years 1 and 2 and becomes full in policy year 3 [25]. Independent reviews state that applicants who qualify for the Preferred (Level) tier receive full coverage from day one with no waiting period, while applicants placed in the Modified tier have a two-year graded benefit period [26].

Fourth, permanent coverage with level premiums. Independent reviews describe the plans as whole life policies with premiums locked for life that never increase [28]. One review states Aetna Final Expense Life plans are whole life policies guaranteed to age 121 [29].

Where the AI Platforms Disagreed or Were Uncertain

Questions This Section Answers

  • What is the maximum Aetna final expense face amount available at ages 81 to 85?
  • Is Aetna final expense coverage immediate or subject to a waiting period at ages 80 to 85?

The platforms disagreed on maximum face amounts at the older end of the band. One independent review states the policy is issued at up to $25,000 for ages 66 to 80 and a maximum of $15,000 for ages 81 to 85 [30]. Another states ages 81 to 85 have a $15,000 maximum benefit with the level benefit plan [31]. A third states the maximum is $25,000 for ages 76 to 89 [32]. A fourth describes a $20,000 maximum benefit for the level whole life plan [33]. These figures cannot all be correct for the same product, state, and issue year.

The platforms also disagreed on maximum issue age. One agency page describes issue ages 40 to 80, a second describes 45 to 85 with ages 45 to 75 for Immediate Benefit Whole Life and 76 to 85 for eligible Modified Benefit Whole Life, and an independent review states issue ages 18 to 80 [33]. These conflict with the official availability chart's stated issue ages through 89 [36].

Benefit structure at older ages was described inconsistently. One agency page states that after age 80 all clients qualify for guaranteed issue whole life insurance, while another describes a Modified Benefit Whole Life option for ages 76 to 85 that returns premiums plus simple interest with no cash value if death occurs during the first two or five years, and a review describes a two-year graded benefit [33]. One platform also reported that the Modified tier is limited to age 75, which would exclude the entire 80-to-85 band from modified coverage [32].

Pricing was not verified anywhere. No official public premium table or individualized quote was located for the target buyer and requested $15,000 to $20,000 benefit [36]. Third-party reviews publish example rates, but those are estimates rather than official quotes [39].

One platform reported a male-specific restriction: Standard and Modified tiers are not available to men over 75, so male applicants aged 80 to 85 must qualify for the Preferred tier [40]. No other platform in this study reported that restriction, so it should be treated as platform-reported and verified with the carrier.

Use-Case-Specific Features and Capabilities

Questions This Section Answers

  • What features make Aetna's final expense product suitable for a nonsmoker aged 80 to 85?
  • Does Aetna final expense build cash value and pay a full death benefit from day one?

The features most relevant to this buyer are issue-age reach, tiered underwriting, and benefit timing.

Issue-age reach is the clearest advantage. Stated issue ages through 89 mean an applicant aged 80 to 85 is inside the range for both relevant product lines [41]. One platform noted this is the highest issue age among the major carriers it compared, exceeding the 85 cap it attributed to Mutual of Omaha and Transamerica [43].

Tiered underwriting is the second feature. Accendo is described as offering level or modified death benefits on a simplified yes/no application [41]. Independent reviews describe a four-tier structure of Super Preferred, Preferred, Standard, and Modified, with Preferred and Standard providing immediate coverage and Modified carrying a two-year graded period [43]. One review states most seniors can qualify for coverage with no waiting period despite health issues such as COPD, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease, and another states most seniors qualify for immediate coverage even with very high-risk conditions like COPD and diabetes [46]. Those are platform-reported underwriting claims, not verified outcomes.

Benefit timing is the third feature. Level benefit pays full face value from issue for both accidental and natural death; modified benefit pays full accidental death immediately but limits non-accidental death in years 1 and 2 [48]. Independent reviews describe the same structure, with graded or modified options limiting benefits in the first two years for higher-risk applicants [49].

Cash value and permanence round out the feature set. Independent reviews state the policies are whole life with cash value accumulation and coverage guaranteed to age 121 [50]. One review notes cash value on small final expense policies is modest and should be used for emergencies only, not as a primary savings vehicle [52].

Pricing, Fees, Contracts, and Ongoing Costs

Questions This Section Answers

  • How much does Aetna final expense cost per month for a nonsmoker aged 80 to 85 seeking $15,000 to $20,000?
  • What fees and contract terms apply to Aetna's Accendo final expense policy?

No official public premium exists for this buyer profile. Aetna's publicly available materials reviewed here do not provide an individualized premium for an 80-to-85-year-old seeking $15,000 to $20,000, and premiums will depend on age, sex, tobacco status, state, face amount, underwriting tier, payment mode, and policy fees [53].

Third-party estimates exist but are not official quotes. One platform reported sample non-tobacco rates at age 80 of roughly $101 per month for a female and $140 per month for a male on $10,000 of Preferred-tier coverage, with an age-85 female figure near $137 per month for $10,000 [55]. Another reported $150 per month for $15,000 at age 80 female and $209 per month for $15,000 at age 80 male [56]. A separate review states many seniors can secure $10,000 of immediate-level Aetna coverage for roughly $40 to $60 per month [57]. These ranges do not reconcile, and none is an official rate guarantee.

On fees, one Aetna/Accendo training document identifies a $40 annual policy fee, but that document is dated 2021 and the fee may not represent every 2026 state form [54]. A later Accendo brochure also cites an annual policy fee of $40 and notes age-last-birthday rating [58]. One platform reported no explicit policy or administrative fee identified in its sources [56], which conflicts with the $40 figure.

On contract terms, coverage remains in force only while required premiums are paid, subject to the policy's grace-period and lapse provisions [53]. Accendo modified-benefit terms reduce non-accidental death benefits during the first two policy years, and the exact formula must be confirmed in the state-specific policy [54]. One review describes a two-year contestability period during which the company may investigate and rescind the policy for material misrepresentation if death occurs within 24 months [59]. Free-look, surrender, nonforfeiture, and cancellation provisions were not verified from the reviewed sources [53].

Pricing confidence across platforms was low to moderate. One platform rated its pricing confidence high based on published sample tables, while others rated confidence low because no official quote was located [56].

Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who is Aetna's final expense product best suited for at ages 80 to 85?
  • Is Aetna a good choice for an 80-to-85-year-old who wants day-one full benefits?

Aetna is best suited for a nonsmoker aged 80 to 85 who wants permanent simplified-issue whole life coverage and may qualify for immediate full natural-death benefits [62]. The strongest fit is a reasonably healthy applicant who qualifies for a level-benefit tier and receives a premium that is affordable relative to the intended funeral or final-expense need [62].

It also suits applicants who value issue-age availability through 89 and coverage amounts that can reach the requested $15,000 to $20,000 range [62]. One platform listed applicants aged 80 to 89 needing coverage up to a $25,000 maximum as a best-fit group [64].

Buyers with modest pre-existing conditions may also fit, since platforms reported that Aetna accepts some conditions declined elsewhere, including controlled COPD, diabetes diagnosed after age 40, and certain cardiac issues [65]. Those are platform-reported underwriting claims.

Buyers who prioritize corporate financial stability may also consider it, given the reported CVS Health ownership and A (Excellent) AM Best rating [67].

Probably Not Best Suited For

Questions This Section Answers

  • Who should not choose Aetna for final expense insurance at ages 80 to 85?
  • Is Aetna a poor fit for a buyer who needs guaranteed acceptance with no health questions?

Aetna is probably not best for applicants who need guaranteed acceptance regardless of health, because the product is simplified issue rather than guaranteed issue and requires health questions [69]. One platform specifically listed applicants seeking guaranteed issue with no health questions as a poor fit [71].

It is also a weaker fit for applicants whose health history is likely to result in a modified benefit, decline, or premiums that make the policy uneconomic [69]. If the applicant is placed in a modified tier, non-accidental death benefits are limited in years 1 and 2, which reduces the value of paying premiums during that period [72].

Buyers who require a publicly available, individualized premium quote before speaking with an agent are also poorly served, because no official public premium table was located for this profile [69].

Buyers who want direct online or mail purchase without agent interaction are a poor fit, since enrollment appears to require contact with a representative or licensed agent [73].

Residents of states where the relevant product is unavailable are also excluded. One independent review states the Protection Series product is not available in ten states: AK, CA, DC, MA, ME, MN, ND, NY, SD, and WA [75]. One platform listed New York residents as a poor fit [71].

When Another Option May Be Better

Questions This Section Answers

  • When is another carrier a better choice than Aetna for final expense coverage at ages 80 to 85?
  • What is a better alternative to Aetna for a buyer who needs guaranteed issue or the lowest premium?

Another option may be better in five situations.

If the applicant cannot qualify for Aetna's simplified-issue underwriting, a guaranteed-issue carrier may be better, though guaranteed-issue premiums and waiting periods should be compared carefully [76]. One platform named guaranteed-issue carriers such as AIG and Gerber as alternatives when the applicant cannot pass any health questions and accepts a two-year waiting period [77].

If the buyer is healthy and seeking the absolute lowest premium, Mutual of Omaha was repeatedly named as cheaper at ages 80 and above, though the reported gap is only $1 to $3 per month at these ages [78]. One platform reported the age-85 gap narrows to $1 [79].

If the applicant has multiple interacting health conditions, Transamerica was named as most lenient on paired health conditions, and one platform noted that complex paired conditions such as insulin-dependent diabetes with COPD may get better underwriting at Transamerica [77].

If Aetna's state-specific maximum is below $15,000, or if the applicant is placed in a modified tier with an unacceptable early-death benefit, a different carrier may be better [76].

If the buyer wants side-by-side quotes from carriers that issue through age 85 or later, a broker comparison may be better than a single-carrier quote [76].

Questions to Verify Before Buying

Questions This Section Answers

  • What should a buyer confirm with Aetna before signing a final expense contract at ages 80 to 85?
  • Which legal entity will issue the Aetna final expense policy, and what tier applies?

Verify these items before paying any premium.

Which legal insurer will issue the policy: Accendo Insurance Company, Continental Life Insurance Company of Brentwood, or another entity [81].

For the buyer's state, whether the requested $15,000 or $20,000 face amount is available at age 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, or 85 [83].

Whether the applicant will receive level, modified, or another benefit tier, and what exact natural-death benefit applies in policy years 1 and 2 [85].

Whether the full death benefit is payable from day one for both accidental and natural death under the quoted policy [85].

The exact monthly, quarterly, semiannual, and annual premiums, including the policy fee and any riders [85].

Whether premiums are guaranteed level for life, and under what circumstances the policy can terminate or require additional payment [89].

What health questions, prescription checks, MIB checks, interviews, or other underwriting sources will be used [90].

The state-specific free-look, grace-period, lapse, reinstatement, cash-value, and nonforfeiture terms [83].

Whether any exclusions, contestability provisions, suicide provisions, or other limitations apply [92].

Whether the buyer can review the state-specific illustration, application, outline of coverage, and specimen policy before paying [83].

If the applicant is male and over 75, whether Preferred tier is the only available option and whether the applicant qualifies [93].

Final AI Consensus Verdict

Aetna is a good but conditional fit for a nonsmoker aged 80 to 85 seeking $15,000 to $20,000 of permanent final expense coverage. Five of seven platforms named it during ranking discovery, and six returned a usable fit assessment. Fit ratings split: two platforms rated it strong, two good, and two mixed.

The strongest reason to consider it is stated issue-age reach through 89 combined with level-benefit tiers that can pay full natural-death benefits from day one [94]. The main limitation is that no official public premium exists for this buyer profile, and public sources conflict on maximum face amounts at ages 81 to 85, ranging from $15,000 to $25,000 [94].

The recommendation becomes mixed if the applicant receives modified benefits, faces a lower state-specific maximum, or cannot obtain a verified premium and immediate-benefit guarantee [94]. Buyers should treat Aetna as a candidate to quote directly while comparing carriers with clearly documented age-80-to-85 eligibility, immediate-benefit options, and published rates [98].

How This Review Was Produced

This review was produced from a structured multi-platform research run dated 2026-09-21. Seven platforms were configured for the study, and six returned a usable fit assessment for Aetna. Five platforms named Aetna during ranking discovery: anthropic, deepseek, google, grok, and kimi.

Each platform returned a fit rating, use-case findings, pricing and terms, limitations, and questions to verify before buying. This article synthesizes those responses, preserves conflicts rather than resolving them, and labels platform-reported claims as such. No independent verification, personal testing, or customer experience was performed.

The consensus index for this category is available at Final Expense Insurance for People Ages 80 to 85.

This review sits within the broader life insurance category directory.

Methodology Limitations

Six of seven included platforms returned a usable fit assessment, so the fit findings are not unanimous and should not be described as such. Platform mentions in the ranking stage count only platforms that named the entity during ranking discovery.

Platform-reported research dates differ from the authoritative run date. One platform reported a research date of 2026-06-11, while the remaining platforms reported 2026-09-21. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

The supplied URLs were collected from platform responses and were not independently validated by the writer stage. Citations are platform-reported evidence, not independently verified facts.

One platform ran without search enabled, so its claims require explicit verification before being described as current facts.

Public sources conflict on maximum issue ages, maximum face amounts, benefit structure at older ages, and pricing. This review does not resolve those conflicts by guessing; it describes them and directs buyers to verify with the carrier.

No official public premium table or individualized quote was located for the target buyer and requested $15,000 to $20,000 benefit. Third-party rate figures cited here are estimates, not official quotes.

The Accendo training material located in search results is dated 2021, so its stated benefit formulas and $40 annual fee may not represent every 2026 state form.

The relevant issuing company may be Accendo or Continental Life rather than Aetna Insurance Company itself, and state-specific availability is not uniform.

Sources

Company-Owned Sources

  • Aetna - Health Insurance, Dental, Vision and Other Plans: https://www.aetna.com/
  • Official pricing and terms source: https://www.aetna.com/#Find
  • Additional AI research evidence98 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-1
    3. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    6. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-12
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-8
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:26-1
    14. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-10
    17. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-7
    21. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-12
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-8
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-15
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-8
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-2
    32. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    34. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    38. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    39. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    40. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:26-1
    43. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-15
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-8
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-6
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:35-15
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    55. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    56. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-12
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-5
    60. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-15
    64. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    65. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-8
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-8
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    71. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-16
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-8
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-9
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-4
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-8
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-10
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-5
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-1
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
    97. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    98. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1

Independent Sources

Other Sources

  • Additional AI research evidence98 records
    1. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    2. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-1
    3. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    4. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    5. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    6. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    7. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    8. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-12
    9. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    10. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-8
    11. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    12. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    13. AI research evidence record anthropic:26-1
    14. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    15. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    16. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-10
    17. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    18. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    19. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-1
    20. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-7
    21. AI research evidence record grok:web:0
    22. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    23. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-12
    24. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-8
    25. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    26. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-15
    27. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
    28. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-8
    29. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-2
    30. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
    31. AI research evidence record anthropic:6-2
    32. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    33. AI research evidence record deepseek:c2
    34. AI research evidence record deepseek:c3
    35. AI research evidence record deepseek:c5
    36. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    37. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    38. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    39. AI research evidence record perplexity:c2
    40. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    41. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    42. AI research evidence record anthropic:26-1
    43. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    44. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-15
    45. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
    46. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-8
    47. AI research evidence record anthropic:29-6
    48. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    49. AI research evidence record anthropic:35-15
    50. AI research evidence record anthropic:25-2
    51. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-8
    52. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    53. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    54. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    55. AI research evidence record grok:web:1
    56. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    57. AI research evidence record anthropic:17-12
    58. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    59. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-5
    60. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    61. AI research evidence record perplexity:c1
    62. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    63. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-15
    64. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    65. AI research evidence record grok:web:5
    66. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-8
    67. AI research evidence record anthropic:11-6
    68. AI research evidence record anthropic:20-8
    69. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    70. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    71. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    72. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    73. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1
    74. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    75. AI research evidence record anthropic:23-16
    76. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    77. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    78. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-8
    79. AI research evidence record anthropic:5-9
    80. AI research evidence record anthropic:1-2
    81. AI research evidence record openai:c4
    82. AI research evidence record anthropic:3-5
    83. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    84. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
    85. AI research evidence record openai:c3
    86. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-16
    87. AI research evidence record anthropic:8-4
    88. AI research evidence record perplexity:c4
    89. AI research evidence record anthropic:15-8
    90. AI research evidence record openai:c2
    91. AI research evidence record anthropic:32-10
    92. AI research evidence record anthropic:30-5
    93. AI research evidence record kimi:asurgo-aetna-2026
    94. AI research evidence record openai:c1
    95. AI research evidence record anthropic:4-1
    96. AI research evidence record anthropic:2-4
    97. AI research evidence record grok:web:3
    98. AI research evidence record deepseek:c1

Verify this research

Check when the research was run, which platforms were included, and what supports the findings.

Study date
September 21, 2026
Platforms analyzed
7
Source records
34
Ranking mentions
5 of 7
Platform share
71%
Final consensus rank
#3

Behind the findings

Platforms in this study

  • ChatGPT
  • Claude
  • DeepSeek
  • Grok
  • Perplexity
  • Kimi
  • Gemini

Source records

23 independent · 9 company-owned · 2 unclear

Evidence support

10 direct · 13 partial

Keep in mind

Use the run research_date as the study date. Platform-reported dates are provenance metadata and do not independently prove freshness.

Technical verification details

Use this SHA-256 fingerprint to identify the source snapshot associated with this study.

7d4ea3fdd582bd026df59148cf9b31279e17ffdec2499275670cc5519db2e4ca